VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

Affected products: vendor, model and version
CWE format is 'CWE-number'. Threat type can be: remote or local
Look up free text in title and description

VAR-201201-0170 CVE-2011-4109 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 9.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: HIGH
Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8s, when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by triggering failure of a policy check. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. HP SSL for OpenVMS v 1.4-453 (based on OpenSSL 0.9.8o stream) and earlier. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Important: rhev-hypervisor5 security and bug fix update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0168-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0168.html Issue date: 2012-02-21 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4109 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4619 CVE-2012-0029 CVE-2012-0207 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: An updated rhev-hypervisor5 package that fixes several security issues and various bugs is now available. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: RHEV Hypervisor for RHEL-5 - noarch 3. Description: The rhev-hypervisor5 package provides a Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor ISO disk image. The Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor is a dedicated Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor. It includes everything necessary to run and manage virtual machines: A subset of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating environment and the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Agent. Note: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor is only available for the Intel 64 and AMD64 architectures with virtualization extensions. A heap overflow flaw was found in the way QEMU-KVM emulated the e1000 network interface card. A privileged guest user in a virtual machine whose network interface is configured to use the e1000 emulated driver could use this flaw to crash the host or, possibly, escalate their privileges on the host. (CVE-2012-0029) A divide-by-zero flaw was found in the Linux kernel's igmp_heard_query() function. An attacker able to send certain IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) packets to a target system could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4109) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. Incorrect initialization of SSL record padding bytes could cause an SSL client or server to send a limited amount of possibly sensitive data to its SSL peer via the encrypted connection. (CVE-2011-4576) It was discovered that OpenSSL did not limit the number of TLS/SSL handshake restarts required to support Server Gated Cryptography. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL consume an excessive amount of CPU by continuously restarting the handshake. (CVE-2011-4619) Red Hat would like to thank Nicolae Mogoreanu for reporting CVE-2012-0029, and Simon McVittie for reporting CVE-2012-0207. This updated package provides updated components that include fixes for various security issues. These issues have no security impact on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor itself, however. The security fixes included in this update address the following CVE numbers: CVE-2006-1168 and CVE-2011-2716 (busybox issues) CVE-2009-5029, CVE-2009-5064, CVE-2010-0830 and CVE-2011-1089 (glibc issues) CVE-2011-1083, CVE-2011-3638, CVE-2011-4086, CVE-2011-4127 and CVE-2012-0028 (kernel issues) CVE-2011-1526 (krb5 issue) CVE-2011-4347 (kvm issue) CVE-2010-4008, CVE-2011-0216, CVE-2011-2834, CVE-2011-3905, CVE-2011-3919 and CVE-2011-1944 (libxml2 issues) CVE-2011-1749 (nfs-utils issue) CVE-2011-4108 (openssl issue) CVE-2011-0010 (sudo issue) CVE-2011-1675 and CVE-2011-1677 (util-linux issues) CVE-2010-0424 (vixie-cron issue) This updated rhev-hypervisor5 package fixes various bugs. Documentation of these changes will be available shortly in the Technical Notes document: https://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_for_Servers/2.2/html/Technical_Notes/index.html Users of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor are advised to upgrade to this updated package, which fixes these issues. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 606191 - after upgrade , reboot can't shut off network successfully and back to firstboot menu again 627538 - System will not boot sometimes when using rhevm to do upgrade twice. 650179 - rhevm bridge came up instead of breth0 after fail to configure network 675325 - Changes to networking always clear the contents of resolv.conf 696875 - RHEVH bootup hanging in ovirt-early when doing LVM scanning 717535 - [RFE] No confirm message for ntp server setting 728895 - RHEV-H rpm should include a versions text file 732948 - CCISS: Auto install fail at creating physical volume. 734110 - rhevh - upgrade ovirt node fails due to nonexistent breth0 734480 - [RFE] Add virt-who package to RHEVH 734710 - Register RHN satellite will fail if RHN satellite password include space. 740127 - Provide our CPE name in a new system file 743938 - Make rhev-hypervisor RPM multi-installable like the kernel 747519 - RHEV-H 5.8 register to RHN will fail. 747647 - Change rhev-hypervisor RPM to be rhev-hypervisor5 to allow coinstallations with rhev-hypervisor6 756178 - remove redundant brcm-iscsi.log rotation from ovirt-node now that it is in iscsi-initiator-utils 758465 - RHEV-H 5.8 register to RHN will fail if password contains quotes or spaces 759462 - Can not retrieve running guests UUID in RHEVH node. 759632 - virt-who debugging output going to stderr always 759635 - Revert workaround of virt-who output 761357 - Multipathd service is stopped by default cause change password failed in single mode. 768256 - network layout is incorrect when configure network with nic up 771771 - CVE-2011-4109 openssl: double-free in policy checks 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 772075 - CVE-2012-0029 qemu-kvm: e1000: process_tx_desc legacy mode packets heap overflow 772867 - CVE-2012-0207 kernel: igmp: Avoid zero delay when receiving odd mixture of IGMP queries 783625 - The setup command should only allow password setting and viewing logs in single mode. 6. Package List: RHEV Hypervisor for RHEL-5: noarch: rhev-hypervisor5-5.8-20120202.0.el5.noarch.rpm rhev-hypervisor5-tools-5.8-20120202.0.el5.noarch.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4109.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0029.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0207.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important https://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_for_Servers/2.2/html/Technical_Notes/index.html 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPQ1yHXlSAg2UNWIIRAl9/AJ9JmPpSO5U2xwDBKDZA8y5To8EVcwCfZFGN bzF952CZ/r5T3LUF9kY6X8c= =IdNq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Content-Disposition: inline ==========================================================================Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1357-1 February 09, 2012 openssl vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 11.10 - Ubuntu 11.04 - Ubuntu 10.10 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in OpenSSL that could expose sensitive information or cause applications to crash. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools Details: It was discovered that the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL, when using the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, did not properly implement curves over binary fields. This could allow an attacker to determine private keys via a timing attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-1945) Adam Langley discovered that the ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) functionality in OpenSSL did not ensure thread safety while processing handshake messages from clients. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-3210) Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) implementation in OpenSSL performed a MAC check only if certain padding is valid. This could allow a remote attacker to recover plaintext. (CVE-2011-4108) Antonio Martin discovered that a flaw existed in the fix to address CVE-2011-4108, the DTLS MAC check failure. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-4109) It was discovered that OpenSSL, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, used an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. (CVE-2011-4354) Adam Langley discovered that the SSL 3.0 implementation in OpenSSL did not properly initialize data structures for block cipher padding. (CVE-2011-4576) Andrew Chi discovered that OpenSSL, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, could trigger an assert when handling an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with IP address blocks or Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. (CVE-2011-4619) Andrey Kulikov discovered that the GOST block cipher engine in OpenSSL did not properly handle invalid parameters. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via crafted data from a TLS client. This issue only affected Ubuntu 11.10. (CVE-2012-0027) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 11.10: libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 openssl 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 Ubuntu 11.04: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 openssl 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 Ubuntu 10.10: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 openssl 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 openssl 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following vulnerabilities: CVE-2011-4108 The DTLS implementation performs a MAC check only if certain padding is valid, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover plaintext via a padding oracle attack. CVE-2011-4354 On 32-bit systems, the operations on NIST elliptic curves P-256 and P-384 are not correctly implemented, potentially leaking the private ECC key of a TLS server. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8g-15+lenny15. For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8o-4squeeze5. For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.0f-1. We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ . _______________________________________________________________________ References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4108 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4109 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4576 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4619 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0027 http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt _______________________________________________________________________ Updated Packages: Mandriva Linux 2011: 2291c13c44539a5e25f58750a5d6bf8f 2011/i586/libopenssl1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm c610330d2c4c7397feb126247b1fa94f 2011/i586/libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 36c86a84320e1c8a17a74e4e68bc7d5a 2011/i586/libopenssl-engines1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 4b8054f2c169d2b3223195053bd15802 2011/i586/libopenssl-static-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 3c48b209b941a83a6acfef439c3f78b7 2011/i586/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 7af9d175d066db069aeb82248df9772b 2011/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2.src.rpm Mandriva Linux 2011/X86_64: 21a50bd2be83839266f033c9a0f0fabc 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 7e80ee8e2d445c5f1985cd52d2316658 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm e1f4faa3162a6bbc14b37e4cb8d1e8e2 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-engines1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 6e3ac6d57cf0f4e13ed8e275a9bd2ff8 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-static-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm e9e0306f8dc9f398915a646547e262e2 2011/x86_64/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 7af9d175d066db069aeb82248df9772b 2011/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2.src.rpm _______________________________________________________________________ To upgrade automatically use MandrivaUpdate or urpmi. The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. Release Date: 2012-01-19 Last Updated: 2012-01-19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Potential Security Impact: Remote Denial of Service (DoS), unauthorized access Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY A potential security vulnerability has been identified with HP-UX OpenSSL. This vulnerability could be exploited remotely to create a Denial of Service (DoS) or to gain unauthorized access. SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, B.11.31 running OpenSSL before vA.00.09.08s. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2011-3210 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4109 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 9.3 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided upgrades to resolve this vulnerability. The upgrades are available from the following location ftp://ossl098s:Secure12@ftp.usa.hp.com HP-UX Release / Depot Name B.11.11 PA (32 and 64) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.001_HP-UX_B.11.11_32+64.depot B.11.23 (PA and IA) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.002_HP-UX_B.11.23_IA-PA.depot B.11.31 (PA and IA) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.003_HP-UX_B.11.31_IA-PA.depot MANUAL ACTIONS: Yes - Update Install OpenSSL A.00.09.08s or subsequent PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION HP-UX Software Assistant: HP-UX Software Assistant is an enhanced application that replaces HP-UX Security Patch Check. It analyzes all Security Bulletins issued by HP and lists recommended actions that may apply to a specific HP-UX system. It can also download patches and create a depot automatically. For more information see: https://www.hp.com/go/swa The following text is for use by the HP-UX Software Assistant. AFFECTED VERSIONS HP-UX B.11.11 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.001 or subsequent HP-UX B.11.23 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.002 or subsequent HP-UX B.11.31 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.003 or subsequent END AFFECTED VERSIONS HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 19 January 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners
VAR-201201-0030 CVE-2011-4576 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The SSL 3.0 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f does not properly initialize data structures for block cipher padding, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by decrypting the padding data sent by an SSL peer. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03360041 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03360041 Version: 1 HPSBMU02786 SSRT100877 rev.1 - HP System Management Homepage (SMH) Running on Linux and Windows, Remote Unauthorized Access, Disclosure of Information, Data Modification, Denial of Service (DoS), Execution of Arbitrary Code NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2012-06-26 Last Updated: 2012-06-26 Potential Security Impact: Remote unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), execution of arbitrary code Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP System Management Homepage (SMH) running on Linux and Windows. The vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely resulting in unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), and execution of arbitrary code. References: CVE-2011-1944, CVE-2011-2821, CVE-2011-2834, CVE-2011-3379, CVE-2011-3607, CVE-2011-4078, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4153, CVE-2011-4317, CVE-2011-4415, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2011-4885, CVE-2012-0021, CVE-2012-0027, CVE-2012-0031, CVE-2012-0036, CVE-2012-0053, CVE-2012-0057, CVE-2012-0830, CVE-2012-1165, CVE-2012-1823, CVE-2012-2012 (AUTOCOMPLETE enabled), CVE-2012-2013 (DoS), CVE-2012-2014 (Improper input validation), CVE-2012-2015 (Privilege Elevation), CVE-2012-2016 (Information disclosure), SSRT100336, SSRT100753, SSRT100669, SSRT100676, SSRT100695, SSRT100714, SSRT100760, SSRT100786, SSRT100787, SSRT100815, SSRT100840, SSRT100843, SSRT100869 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before v7.1.1 running on Linux and Windows. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2012-2012 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:P) 9.7 CVE-2012-2013 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2012-2014 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:N) 6.8 CVE-2012-2015 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 6.5 CVE-2012-2016 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N) 4.4 CVE-2011-1944 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 9.3 CVE-2011-2821 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-2834 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2011-3379 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-3607 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.4 CVE-2011-4078 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4153 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4317 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4415 (AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 1.2 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4885 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0021 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2012-0027 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0031 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.6 CVE-2012-0036 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-0053 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-0057 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2012-0830 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-1165 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-1823 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 or subsequent to resolve the vulnerabilities. HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 is available here: HP System Management Homepage for Windows x64 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4064%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-ab 0d4e9bb4654a8da503eccfd9%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Windows x86 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4022%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-f7 c0d15d28474255bd0ec23136%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (AMD64/EM64T) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4035%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-18 d373dd1361400fbaca892942%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (x86) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4006%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-9e 8a0188f97d48139dcb466509%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 26 June 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. Corrected: 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_7, 7.4-STABLE) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_7_4, 7.4-RELEASE-p7) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_8, 8.3-STABLE) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_8_3, 8.3-RELEASE-p1) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_8_2, 8.2-RELEASE-p7) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_8_1, 8.1-RELEASE-p9) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_9, 9.0-STABLE) 2012-05-03 15:25:11 UTC (RELENG_9_0, 9.0-RELEASE-p1) CVE Name: CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2011-4109, CVE-2012-0884, CVE-2012-2110 For general information regarding FreeBSD Security Advisories, including descriptions of the fields above, security branches, and the following sections, please visit <URL:http://security.FreeBSD.org/>. Background FreeBSD includes software from the OpenSSL Project. II. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. [CVE-2011-4619] If an application uses OpenSSL's certificate policy checking when verifying X509 certificates, by enabling the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag, a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. [CVE-2011-4109] A weakness in the OpenSSL PKCS #7 code can be exploited using Bleichenbacher's attack on PKCS #1 v1.5 RSA padding also known as the million message attack (MMA). [CVE-2012-0884] The asn1_d2i_read_bio() function, used by the d2i_*_bio and d2i_*_fp functions, in OpenSSL contains multiple integer errors that can cause memory corruption when parsing encoded ASN.1 data. This error can occur on systems that parse untrusted ASN.1 data, such as X.509 certificates or RSA public keys. [CVE-2012-2110] III. Impact Sensitive contents of the previously freed memory can be exposed when communicating with a SSL 3.0 peer. However, FreeBSD OpenSSL version does not support SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS SSL mode and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer than any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. [CVE-2011-4619] The double-free, when an application performs X509 certificate policy checking, can lead to denial of service in that application. [CVE-2011-4109] A weakness in the OpenSSL PKCS #7 code can lead to a successful Bleichenbacher attack. Only users of PKCS #7 decryption operations are affected. A successful attack needs on average 2^20 messages. In practice only automated systems will be affected as humans will not be willing to process this many messages. SSL/TLS applications are not affected. [CVE-2012-0884] The vulnerability in the asn1_d2i_read_bio() OpenSSL function can lead to a potentially exploitable attack via buffer overflow. The SSL/TLS code in OpenSSL is not affected by this issue, nor are applications using the memory based ASN.1 functions. There are no applications in FreeBSD base system affected by this issue, though some 3rd party consumers of these functions might be vulnerable when processing untrusted ASN.1 data. [CVE-2012-2110] IV. Workaround No workaround is available. V. Solution Perform one of the following: 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 7-STABLE, 8-STABLE or 9-STABLE, or to the RELENG_7_4, RELENG_8_3, RELENG_8_2, RELENG_8_1, RELENG_9_0 security branch dated after the correction date. 2) To update your vulnerable system via a source code patch: The following patches have been verified to apply to FreeBSD 7.4, 8.3, 8.2, 8.1, and 9.0 systems. a) Download the relevant patch from the location below, and verify the detached PGP signature using your PGP utility. # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-12:01/openssl.patch # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-12:01/openssl.patch.asc b) Execute the following commands as root: # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/patch c) Recompile the operating system as described in <URL: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/makeworld.html> and reboot the system. NOTE: Any third-party applications, including those installed from the FreeBSD ports collection, which are statically linked to libcrypto(3) should be recompiled in order to use the corrected code. 3) To update your vulnerable system via a binary patch: Systems running 7.4-RELEASE, 8.3-RELEASE, 8.2-RELEASE, 8.1-RELEASE or 9.0-RELEASE on the i386 or amd64 platforms can be updated via the freebsd-update(8) utility: # freebsd-update fetch # freebsd-update install VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. CVS: Branch Revision Path - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_7 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.1.1.8.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.1.1.1.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.1.1.2.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.1.1.4.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.1.1.11.2.3 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.17.2.7 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.1.1.16.2.3 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.1.1.13.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.1.1.6.2.2 RELENG_7_4 src/UPDATING 1.507.2.36.2.9 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.72.2.18.2.12 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.1.1.8.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.1.1.1.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.1.1.2.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.20.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.1.1.4.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.1.1.11.2.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.1.1.17.2.5.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.1.1.16.2.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.1.1.13.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.1.1.6.2.1.2.1 RELENG_8 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.10.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.2.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.2.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.3.2.5 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.2.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.2.2.2 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.2.2.2 RELENG_8_3 src/UPDATING 1.632.2.26.2.3 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.83.2.15.2.5 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.10.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.2.2.1.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.26.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.14.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.2.2.1.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.3.2.4.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.2.2.1.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.2.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.2.2.1.6.1 RELENG_8_2 src/UPDATING 1.632.2.19.2.9 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.83.2.12.2.12 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.10.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.2.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.18.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.8.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.2.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.3.2.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.2.2.1.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.2.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.2.2.1.4.1 RELENG_8_1 src/UPDATING 1.632.2.14.2.12 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.83.2.10.2.13 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.1.1.13.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.2.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.16.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.2.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.3.2.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.2.2.1.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.2.6.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.2.2.1.2.1 RELENG_9 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.2.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.22.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.10.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.7.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.3.2.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.3.2.1 RELENG_9_0 src/UPDATING 1.702.2.4.2.3 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.95.2.4.2.5 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c 1.2.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/mem.c 1.2.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_map.c 1.2.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c 1.3.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c 1.1.1.3.24.1 src/crypto/openssl/crypto/buffer/buffer.c 1.2.12.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_err.c 1.3.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c 1.7.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl.h 1.3.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_enc.c 1.3.4.1 src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl3.h 1.3.4.1 - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subversion: Branch/path Revision - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- stable/7/ r234954 releng/7.4/ r234954 stable/8/ r234954 releng/8.3/ r234954 releng/8.2/ r234954 releng/8.1/ r234954 stable/9/ r234954 releng/9.0/ r234954 - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: OpenSSL: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: March 06, 2012 Bugs: #397695, #399365 ID: 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-libs/openssl < 1.0.0g *>= 0.9.8t >= 1.0.0g Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL: * Timing differences for decryption are exposed by CBC mode encryption in OpenSSL's implementation of DTLS (CVE-2011-4108). * Assertion errors can occur during the handling of malformed X.509 certificates when OpenSSL is built with RFC 3779 support (CVE-2011-4577). * Invalid parameters in the GOST block cipher are not properly handled by the GOST ENGINE(CVE-2012-0027). * An incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108 creates an unspecified vulnerability for DTLS applications using OpenSSL (CVE-2012-0050). Resolution ========== All OpenSSL users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0g" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2011-4108 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4108 [ 2 ] CVE-2011-4109 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4109 [ 3 ] CVE-2011-4576 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4576 [ 4 ] CVE-2011-4577 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4577 [ 5 ] CVE-2011-4619 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4619 [ 6 ] CVE-2012-0027 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0027 [ 7 ] CVE-2012-0050 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0050 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-12.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2012 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 . Multiple numeric conversion errors, leading to a buffer overflow, were found in the way OpenSSL parsed ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One) data from BIO (OpenSSL's I/O abstraction) inputs. Specially-crafted DER (Distinguished Encoding Rules) encoded data read from a file or other BIO input could cause an application using the OpenSSL library to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2012-2110) A double free flaw was discovered in the policy checking code in OpenSSL. Warning: Before applying the update, back up your existing JBoss Enterprise Web Server installation (including all applications and configuration files). All users of JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0.2 for Solaris and Microsoft Windows as provided from the Red Hat Customer Portal are advised to apply this update. Solution: The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Before applying the update, back up your existing JBoss Enterprise Web Server installation (including all applications and configuration files). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0059-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0059.html Issue date: 2012-01-24 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4108 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4577 CVE-2011-4619 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated openssl packages that fix multiple security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols, as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library. It was discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol implementation in OpenSSL leaked timing information when performing certain operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a DTLS server as a padding oracle. (CVE-2011-4108) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. (CVE-2011-4576) A denial of service flaw was found in the RFC 3779 implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using OpenSSL exit unexpectedly by providing a specially-crafted X.509 certificate that has malformed RFC 3779 extension data. (CVE-2011-4577) It was discovered that OpenSSL did not limit the number of TLS/SSL handshake restarts required to support Server Gated Cryptography. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL consume an excessive amount of CPU by continuously restarting the handshake. (CVE-2011-4619) All OpenSSL users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues. For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 771770 - CVE-2011-4108 openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771778 - CVE-2011-4577 openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4108.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4577.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPHySOXlSAg2UNWIIRAlYpAKCQCY5k4gZ5VKOHZekEaWFHDNjGZwCZAdR3 CJl5iUxU4cxJLOsSBESSRVs= =PMiS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following vulnerabilities: CVE-2011-4108 The DTLS implementation performs a MAC check only if certain padding is valid, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover plaintext via a padding oracle attack. CVE-2011-4109 A double free vulnerability when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause applications crashes and potentially allow execution of arbitrary code by triggering failure of a policy check. CVE-2011-4354 On 32-bit systems, the operations on NIST elliptic curves P-256 and P-384 are not correctly implemented, potentially leaking the private ECC key of a TLS server. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8g-15+lenny15. For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8o-4squeeze5. For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.0f-1. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ . The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security
VAR-201201-0314 CVE-2011-4619 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f does not properly handle handshake restarts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via unspecified vectors. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. DTLS Plaintext Recovery Attack (CVE-2011-4108) ============================================== Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson have discovered an extension of the Vaudenay padding oracle attack on CBC mode encryption which enables an efficient plaintext recovery attack against the OpenSSL implementation of DTLS. Their attack exploits timing differences arising during decryption processing. A research paper describing this attack can be found at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf Thanks go to Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson of the Information Security Group at Royal Holloway, University of London (www.isg.rhul.ac.uk) for discovering this flaw and to Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> and Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> for preparing the fix. Double-free in Policy Checks (CVE-2011-4109) ============================================ If X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is set in OpenSSL 0.9.8, then a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. The bug does not occur unless this flag is set. Users of OpenSSL 1.0.0 are not affected. This flaw was discovered by Ben Laurie and a fix provided by Emilia Kasper <ekasper@google.com> of Google. This affects both clients and servers that accept SSL 3.0 handshakes: those that call SSL_CTX_new with SSLv3_{server|client}_method or SSLv23_{server|client}_method. It does not affect TLS. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. However, in practice, most deployments do not use SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer any any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. Thanks to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for identifying and fixing this issue. Malformed RFC 3779 Data Can Cause Assertion Failures (CVE-2011-4577) ==================================================================== RFC 3779 data can be included in certificates, and if it is malformed, may trigger an assertion failure. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Note, however, that in the standard release of OpenSSL, RFC 3779 support is disabled by default, and in this case OpenSSL is not vulnerable. Builds of OpenSSL are vulnerable if configured with "enable-rfc3779". Thanks to Andrew Chi, BBN Technologies, for discovering the flaw, and Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> for fixing it. Thanks to George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com> for identifying this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. Invalid GOST parameters DoS Attack (CVE-2012-0027) =================================================== A malicious TLS client can send an invalid set of GOST parameters which will cause the server to crash due to lack of error checking. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Only users of the OpenSSL GOST ENGINE are affected by this bug. Thanks to Andrey Kulikov <amdeich@gmail.com> for identifying and fixing this issue. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03383940 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03383940 Version: 1 HPSBOV02793 SSRT100891 rev.1 - HP OpenVMS running SSL, Remote Denial of Service (DoS), Unauthorized Access NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2012-06-21 Last Updated: 2012-06-21 Potential Security Impact: Remote Denial of Service (DoS), unauthorized access Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP OpenVMS runing SSL. The vulnerabilities could be remotely exploited to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or to gain unauthorized access. References: CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4109, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2012-0050, CVE-2012-0884, CVE-2012-1165, CVE-2012-2110, CVE-2012-2131 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP SSL for OpenVMS v 1.4-453 (based on OpenSSL 0.9.8o stream) and earlier. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4109 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 9.3 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0050 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0884 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2012-1165 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-2110 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-2131 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has made the following patch kits available to resolve the vulnerability. Patch kit Name Location HP SSL 1.4-467 (Based on OpenSSL 0.9.8w) http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/products/ssl/ssl.html HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 21 June 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. Multiple numeric conversion errors, leading to a buffer overflow, were found in the way OpenSSL parsed ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One) data from BIO (OpenSSL's I/O abstraction) inputs. Specially-crafted DER (Distinguished Encoding Rules) encoded data read from a file or other BIO input could cause an application using the OpenSSL library to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Warning: Before applying this update, back up your existing JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications, and also back up your existing Apache HTTP Server installation (including all applications and configuration files). All users of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.0.0 for Solaris and Microsoft Windows as provided from the Red Hat Customer Portal are advised to apply this update. Solution: The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Before applying the update, back up your existing JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications, and also back up your existing Apache HTTP Server installation (including all applications and configuration files). HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before v7.1.1 running on Linux, Windows and VMware ESX. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0059-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0059.html Issue date: 2012-01-24 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4108 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4577 CVE-2011-4619 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated openssl packages that fix multiple security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols, as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library. It was discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol implementation in OpenSSL leaked timing information when performing certain operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a DTLS server as a padding oracle. (CVE-2011-4108) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. Incorrect initialization of SSL record padding bytes could cause an SSL client or server to send a limited amount of possibly sensitive data to its SSL peer via the encrypted connection. (CVE-2011-4576) A denial of service flaw was found in the RFC 3779 implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using OpenSSL exit unexpectedly by providing a specially-crafted X.509 certificate that has malformed RFC 3779 extension data. (CVE-2011-4619) All OpenSSL users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues. For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 771770 - CVE-2011-4108 openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771778 - CVE-2011-4577 openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4108.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4577.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPHySOXlSAg2UNWIIRAlYpAKCQCY5k4gZ5VKOHZekEaWFHDNjGZwCZAdR3 CJl5iUxU4cxJLOsSBESSRVs= =PMiS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following vulnerabilities: CVE-2011-4108 The DTLS implementation performs a MAC check only if certain padding is valid, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover plaintext via a padding oracle attack. CVE-2011-4109 A double free vulnerability when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause applications crashes and potentially allow execution of arbitrary code by triggering failure of a policy check. CVE-2011-4354 On 32-bit systems, the operations on NIST elliptic curves P-256 and P-384 are not correctly implemented, potentially leaking the private ECC key of a TLS server. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8g-15+lenny15. For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8o-4squeeze5. For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.0f-1. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
VAR-201201-0312 CVE-2011-4577 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. DTLS Plaintext Recovery Attack (CVE-2011-4108) ============================================== Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson have discovered an extension of the Vaudenay padding oracle attack on CBC mode encryption which enables an efficient plaintext recovery attack against the OpenSSL implementation of DTLS. Their attack exploits timing differences arising during decryption processing. A research paper describing this attack can be found at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf Thanks go to Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson of the Information Security Group at Royal Holloway, University of London (www.isg.rhul.ac.uk) for discovering this flaw and to Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> and Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> for preparing the fix. Double-free in Policy Checks (CVE-2011-4109) ============================================ If X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is set in OpenSSL 0.9.8, then a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. The bug does not occur unless this flag is set. Users of OpenSSL 1.0.0 are not affected. This flaw was discovered by Ben Laurie and a fix provided by Emilia Kasper <ekasper@google.com> of Google. This affects both clients and servers that accept SSL 3.0 handshakes: those that call SSL_CTX_new with SSLv3_{server|client}_method or SSLv23_{server|client}_method. It does not affect TLS. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. However, in practice, most deployments do not use SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer any any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. Thanks to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for identifying and fixing this issue. Malformed RFC 3779 Data Can Cause Assertion Failures (CVE-2011-4577) ==================================================================== RFC 3779 data can be included in certificates, and if it is malformed, may trigger an assertion failure. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Note, however, that in the standard release of OpenSSL, RFC 3779 support is disabled by default, and in this case OpenSSL is not vulnerable. Builds of OpenSSL are vulnerable if configured with "enable-rfc3779". Thanks to Andrew Chi, BBN Technologies, for discovering the flaw, and Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> for fixing it. Thanks to George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com> for identifying this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. Invalid GOST parameters DoS Attack (CVE-2012-0027) =================================================== A malicious TLS client can send an invalid set of GOST parameters which will cause the server to crash due to lack of error checking. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Only users of the OpenSSL GOST ENGINE are affected by this bug. Thanks to Andrey Kulikov <amdeich@gmail.com> for identifying and fixing this issue. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt . HP SSL for OpenVMS v 1.4-453 (based on OpenSSL 0.9.8o stream) and earlier. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0059-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0059.html Issue date: 2012-01-24 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4108 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4577 CVE-2011-4619 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated openssl packages that fix multiple security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols, as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library. It was discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol implementation in OpenSSL leaked timing information when performing certain operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a DTLS server as a padding oracle. (CVE-2011-4108) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. Incorrect initialization of SSL record padding bytes could cause an SSL client or server to send a limited amount of possibly sensitive data to its SSL peer via the encrypted connection. (CVE-2011-4576) A denial of service flaw was found in the RFC 3779 implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using OpenSSL exit unexpectedly by providing a specially-crafted X.509 certificate that has malformed RFC 3779 extension data. (CVE-2011-4577) It was discovered that OpenSSL did not limit the number of TLS/SSL handshake restarts required to support Server Gated Cryptography. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL consume an excessive amount of CPU by continuously restarting the handshake. (CVE-2011-4619) All OpenSSL users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues. For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 771770 - CVE-2011-4108 openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771778 - CVE-2011-4577 openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4108.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4577.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPHySOXlSAg2UNWIIRAlYpAKCQCY5k4gZ5VKOHZekEaWFHDNjGZwCZAdR3 CJl5iUxU4cxJLOsSBESSRVs= =PMiS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Content-Disposition: inline ==========================================================================Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1357-1 February 09, 2012 openssl vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 11.10 - Ubuntu 11.04 - Ubuntu 10.10 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in OpenSSL that could expose sensitive information or cause applications to crash. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools Details: It was discovered that the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL, when using the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, did not properly implement curves over binary fields. This could allow an attacker to determine private keys via a timing attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-1945) Adam Langley discovered that the ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) functionality in OpenSSL did not ensure thread safety while processing handshake messages from clients. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. This could allow a remote attacker to recover plaintext. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-4109) It was discovered that OpenSSL, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, used an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4619) Andrey Kulikov discovered that the GOST block cipher engine in OpenSSL did not properly handle invalid parameters. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via crafted data from a TLS client. This issue only affected Ubuntu 11.10. (CVE-2012-0027) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 11.10: libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 openssl 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 Ubuntu 11.04: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 openssl 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 Ubuntu 10.10: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 openssl 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 openssl 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. Relevant releases/architectures: RHEV Hypervisor for RHEL-6 - noarch 3. The Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor is a dedicated Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor. A heap overflow flaw was found in the way QEMU-KVM emulated the e1000 network interface card. A privileged guest user in a virtual machine whose network interface is configured to use the e1000 emulated driver could use this flaw to crash the host or, possibly, escalate their privileges on the host. The security fixes included in this update address the following CVE numbers: CVE-2009-5029 and CVE-2011-4609 (glibc issues) CVE-2012-0056 (kernel issue) CVE-2011-4108 and CVE-2012-0050 (openssl issues) This update also fixes the following bugs: * Previously, it was possible to begin a Hypervisor installation without any valid disks to install to. Now, if no valid disks are found for Hypervisor installation, a message is displayed informing the user that there are no valid disks for installation. (BZ#781471) * Previously, the user interface for the Hypervisor did not indicate whether the system was registered with Red Hat Network (RHN) Classic or RHN Satellite. As a result, customers could not easily determine the registration status of their Hypervisor installations. The TUI has been updated to display the registration status of the Hypervisor. (BZ#788223) * Previously, autoinstall would fail if the firstboot or reinstall options were passed but local_boot or upgrade were not passed. Now, neither the local_boot or upgrade parameters are required for autoinstall. 788225 - autoinstall fails when local_boot or upgrade not passed on command line 788226 - rhev-hypervisor6 6.2 Update 2 Release bugzilla 6. Release Date: 2012-01-19 Last Updated: 2012-01-19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Potential Security Impact: Remote Denial of Service (DoS), unauthorized access Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY A potential security vulnerability has been identified with HP-UX OpenSSL. This vulnerability could be exploited remotely to create a Denial of Service (DoS) or to gain unauthorized access. SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, B.11.31 running OpenSSL before vA.00.09.08s. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2011-3210 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4109 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 9.3 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided upgrades to resolve this vulnerability. The upgrades are available from the following location ftp://ossl098s:Secure12@ftp.usa.hp.com HP-UX Release / Depot Name B.11.11 PA (32 and 64) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.001_HP-UX_B.11.11_32+64.depot B.11.23 (PA and IA) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.002_HP-UX_B.11.23_IA-PA.depot B.11.31 (PA and IA) / OpenSSL_A.00.09.08s.003_HP-UX_B.11.31_IA-PA.depot MANUAL ACTIONS: Yes - Update Install OpenSSL A.00.09.08s or subsequent PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION HP-UX Software Assistant: HP-UX Software Assistant is an enhanced application that replaces HP-UX Security Patch Check. It analyzes all Security Bulletins issued by HP and lists recommended actions that may apply to a specific HP-UX system. It can also download patches and create a depot automatically. For more information see: https://www.hp.com/go/swa The following text is for use by the HP-UX Software Assistant. AFFECTED VERSIONS HP-UX B.11.11 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.001 or subsequent HP-UX B.11.23 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.002 or subsequent HP-UX B.11.31 ================== openssl.OPENSSL-CER openssl.OPENSSL-CONF openssl.OPENSSL-DOC openssl.OPENSSL-INC openssl.OPENSSL-LIB openssl.OPENSSL-MAN openssl.OPENSSL-MIS openssl.OPENSSL-PRNG openssl.OPENSSL-PVT openssl.OPENSSL-RUN openssl.OPENSSL-SRC action: Install revision A.00.09.08s.003 or subsequent END AFFECTED VERSIONS HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 19 January 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners
VAR-201201-0169 CVE-2011-4108 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f performs a MAC check only if certain padding is valid, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover plaintext via a padding oracle attack. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. Their attack exploits timing differences arising during decryption processing. A research paper describing this attack can be found at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf Thanks go to Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson of the Information Security Group at Royal Holloway, University of London (www.isg.rhul.ac.uk) for discovering this flaw and to Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> and Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> for preparing the fix. Double-free in Policy Checks (CVE-2011-4109) ============================================ If X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is set in OpenSSL 0.9.8, then a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. The bug does not occur unless this flag is set. Users of OpenSSL 1.0.0 are not affected. This flaw was discovered by Ben Laurie and a fix provided by Emilia Kasper <ekasper@google.com> of Google. This affects both clients and servers that accept SSL 3.0 handshakes: those that call SSL_CTX_new with SSLv3_{server|client}_method or SSLv23_{server|client}_method. It does not affect TLS. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. However, in practice, most deployments do not use SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer any any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. Thanks to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for identifying and fixing this issue. Malformed RFC 3779 Data Can Cause Assertion Failures (CVE-2011-4577) ==================================================================== RFC 3779 data can be included in certificates, and if it is malformed, may trigger an assertion failure. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Note, however, that in the standard release of OpenSSL, RFC 3779 support is disabled by default, and in this case OpenSSL is not vulnerable. Builds of OpenSSL are vulnerable if configured with "enable-rfc3779". Thanks to Andrew Chi, BBN Technologies, for discovering the flaw, and Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> for fixing it. Thanks to George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com> for identifying this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. Invalid GOST parameters DoS Attack (CVE-2012-0027) =================================================== A malicious TLS client can send an invalid set of GOST parameters which will cause the server to crash due to lack of error checking. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Only users of the OpenSSL GOST ENGINE are affected by this bug. Thanks to Andrey Kulikov <amdeich@gmail.com> for identifying and fixing this issue. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt . Multiple numeric conversion errors, leading to a buffer overflow, were found in the way OpenSSL parsed ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One) data from BIO (OpenSSL's I/O abstraction) inputs. Specially-crafted DER (Distinguished Encoding Rules) encoded data read from a file or other BIO input could cause an application using the OpenSSL library to crash or, potentially, execute arbitrary code. Warning: Before applying this update, back up your JBoss Enterprise Application Platform's "server/[PROFILE]/deploy/" directory, along with all other customized configuration files. All users of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.2 for Solaris and Microsoft Windows as provided from the Red Hat Customer Portal are advised to apply this update. Solution: The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Before applying the update, back up your existing JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation (including all applications and configuration files). HP SSL for OpenVMS v 1.4-453 (based on OpenSSL 0.9.8o stream) and earlier. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03360041 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03360041 Version: 1 HPSBMU02786 SSRT100877 rev.1 - HP System Management Homepage (SMH) Running on Linux and Windows, Remote Unauthorized Access, Disclosure of Information, Data Modification, Denial of Service (DoS), Execution of Arbitrary Code NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2012-06-26 Last Updated: 2012-06-26 Potential Security Impact: Remote unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), execution of arbitrary code Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP System Management Homepage (SMH) running on Linux and Windows. The vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely resulting in unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), and execution of arbitrary code. References: CVE-2011-1944, CVE-2011-2821, CVE-2011-2834, CVE-2011-3379, CVE-2011-3607, CVE-2011-4078, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4153, CVE-2011-4317, CVE-2011-4415, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2011-4885, CVE-2012-0021, CVE-2012-0027, CVE-2012-0031, CVE-2012-0036, CVE-2012-0053, CVE-2012-0057, CVE-2012-0830, CVE-2012-1165, CVE-2012-1823, CVE-2012-2012 (AUTOCOMPLETE enabled), CVE-2012-2013 (DoS), CVE-2012-2014 (Improper input validation), CVE-2012-2015 (Privilege Elevation), CVE-2012-2016 (Information disclosure), SSRT100336, SSRT100753, SSRT100669, SSRT100676, SSRT100695, SSRT100714, SSRT100760, SSRT100786, SSRT100787, SSRT100815, SSRT100840, SSRT100843, SSRT100869 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before v7.1.1 running on Linux and Windows. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2012-2012 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:P) 9.7 CVE-2012-2013 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2012-2014 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:N) 6.8 CVE-2012-2015 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 6.5 CVE-2012-2016 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N) 4.4 CVE-2011-1944 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 9.3 CVE-2011-2821 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-2834 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2011-3379 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-3607 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.4 CVE-2011-4078 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4153 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4317 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4415 (AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 1.2 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4885 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0021 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2012-0027 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0031 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.6 CVE-2012-0036 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-0053 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-0057 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2012-0830 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-1165 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-1823 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 or subsequent to resolve the vulnerabilities. HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 is available here: HP System Management Homepage for Windows x64 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4064%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-ab 0d4e9bb4654a8da503eccfd9%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Windows x86 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4022%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-f7 c0d15d28474255bd0ec23136%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (AMD64/EM64T) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4035%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-18 d373dd1361400fbaca892942%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (x86) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4006%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-9e 8a0188f97d48139dcb466509%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 26 June 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0059-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0059.html Issue date: 2012-01-24 CVE Names: CVE-2011-4108 CVE-2011-4576 CVE-2011-4577 CVE-2011-4619 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated openssl packages that fix multiple security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) protocols, as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library. It was discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol implementation in OpenSSL leaked timing information when performing certain operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a DTLS server as a padding oracle. (CVE-2011-4108) An information leak flaw was found in the SSL 3.0 protocol implementation in OpenSSL. Incorrect initialization of SSL record padding bytes could cause an SSL client or server to send a limited amount of possibly sensitive data to its SSL peer via the encrypted connection. (CVE-2011-4576) A denial of service flaw was found in the RFC 3779 implementation in OpenSSL. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using OpenSSL exit unexpectedly by providing a specially-crafted X.509 certificate that has malformed RFC 3779 extension data. (CVE-2011-4577) It was discovered that OpenSSL did not limit the number of TLS/SSL handshake restarts required to support Server Gated Cryptography. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server using OpenSSL consume an excessive amount of CPU by continuously restarting the handshake. (CVE-2011-4619) All OpenSSL users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues. For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 771770 - CVE-2011-4108 openssl: DTLS plaintext recovery attack 771775 - CVE-2011-4576 openssl: uninitialized SSL 3.0 padding 771778 - CVE-2011-4577 openssl: malformed RFC 3779 data can cause assertion failures 771780 - CVE-2011-4619 openssl: SGC restart DoS attack 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.src.rpm i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4108.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4576.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4577.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4619.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPHySOXlSAg2UNWIIRAlYpAKCQCY5k4gZ5VKOHZekEaWFHDNjGZwCZAdR3 CJl5iUxU4cxJLOsSBESSRVs= =PMiS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Content-Disposition: inline ==========================================================================Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1357-1 February 09, 2012 openssl vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 11.10 - Ubuntu 11.04 - Ubuntu 10.10 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in OpenSSL that could expose sensitive information or cause applications to crash. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools Details: It was discovered that the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL, when using the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, did not properly implement curves over binary fields. This could allow an attacker to determine private keys via a timing attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-1945) Adam Langley discovered that the ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) functionality in OpenSSL did not ensure thread safety while processing handshake messages from clients. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. This could allow a remote attacker to recover plaintext. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-4109) It was discovered that OpenSSL, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, used an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. (CVE-2011-4576) Andrew Chi discovered that OpenSSL, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, could trigger an assert when handling an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with IP address blocks or Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4619) Andrey Kulikov discovered that the GOST block cipher engine in OpenSSL did not properly handle invalid parameters. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via crafted data from a TLS client. This issue only affected Ubuntu 11.10. (CVE-2012-0027) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 11.10: libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 openssl 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 Ubuntu 11.04: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 openssl 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 Ubuntu 10.10: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 openssl 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 openssl 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. CVE-2011-4109 A double free vulnerability when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause applications crashes and potentially allow execution of arbitrary code by triggering failure of a policy check. CVE-2011-4354 On 32-bit systems, the operations on NIST elliptic curves P-256 and P-384 are not correctly implemented, potentially leaking the private ECC key of a TLS server. For the oldstable distribution (lenny), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8g-15+lenny15. For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in version 0.9.8o-4squeeze5. For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.0f-1. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ . The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security
VAR-201201-0049 CVE-2012-0027 Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client. Fiery Network Controllers for Xerox DocuColor 242/252/260 Printer/Copier use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL (0.9.8o). OpenSSL prone to multiple security vulnerabilities. An attacker may leverage these issues to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial-of-service condition and perform unauthorized actions. DTLS Plaintext Recovery Attack (CVE-2011-4108) ============================================== Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson have discovered an extension of the Vaudenay padding oracle attack on CBC mode encryption which enables an efficient plaintext recovery attack against the OpenSSL implementation of DTLS. Their attack exploits timing differences arising during decryption processing. A research paper describing this attack can be found at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf Thanks go to Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson of the Information Security Group at Royal Holloway, University of London (www.isg.rhul.ac.uk) for discovering this flaw and to Robin Seggelmann <seggelmann@fh-muenster.de> and Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> for preparing the fix. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0f or 0.9.8s. Double-free in Policy Checks (CVE-2011-4109) ============================================ If X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is set in OpenSSL 0.9.8, then a policy check failure can lead to a double-free. The bug does not occur unless this flag is set. Users of OpenSSL 1.0.0 are not affected. This flaw was discovered by Ben Laurie and a fix provided by Emilia Kasper <ekasper@google.com> of Google. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.8s. Uninitialized SSL 3.0 Padding (CVE-2011-4576) ============================================= OpenSSL prior to 1.0.0f and 0.9.8s failed to clear the bytes used as block cipher padding in SSL 3.0 records. This affects both clients and servers that accept SSL 3.0 handshakes: those that call SSL_CTX_new with SSLv3_{server|client}_method or SSLv23_{server|client}_method. It does not affect TLS. As a result, in each record, up to 15 bytes of uninitialized memory may be sent, encrypted, to the SSL peer. This could include sensitive contents of previously freed memory. However, in practice, most deployments do not use SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS and therefore have a single write buffer per connection. That write buffer is partially filled with non-sensitive, handshake data at the beginning of the connection and, thereafter, only records which are longer any any previously sent record leak any non-encrypted data. This, combined with the small number of bytes leaked per record, serves to limit to severity of this issue. Thanks to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for identifying and fixing this issue. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0f or 0.9.8s. Malformed RFC 3779 Data Can Cause Assertion Failures (CVE-2011-4577) ==================================================================== RFC 3779 data can be included in certificates, and if it is malformed, may trigger an assertion failure. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Note, however, that in the standard release of OpenSSL, RFC 3779 support is disabled by default, and in this case OpenSSL is not vulnerable. Builds of OpenSSL are vulnerable if configured with "enable-rfc3779". Thanks to Andrew Chi, BBN Technologies, for discovering the flaw, and Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> for fixing it. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0f or 0.9.8s. SGC Restart DoS Attack (CVE-2011-4619) ====================================== Support for handshake restarts for server gated cryptograpy (SGC) can be used in a denial-of-service attack. Thanks to George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com> for identifying this issue and to Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> for fixing it. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0f or 0.9.8s. This could be used in a denial-of-service attack. Only users of the OpenSSL GOST ENGINE are affected by this bug. Thanks to Andrey Kulikov <amdeich@gmail.com> for identifying and fixing this issue. Affected users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.0f. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c03360041 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c03360041 Version: 1 HPSBMU02786 SSRT100877 rev.1 - HP System Management Homepage (SMH) Running on Linux and Windows, Remote Unauthorized Access, Disclosure of Information, Data Modification, Denial of Service (DoS), Execution of Arbitrary Code NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2012-06-26 Last Updated: 2012-06-26 Potential Security Impact: Remote unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), execution of arbitrary code Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP System Management Homepage (SMH) running on Linux and Windows. The vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely resulting in unauthorized access, disclosure of information, data modification, Denial of Service (DoS), and execution of arbitrary code. References: CVE-2011-1944, CVE-2011-2821, CVE-2011-2834, CVE-2011-3379, CVE-2011-3607, CVE-2011-4078, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4153, CVE-2011-4317, CVE-2011-4415, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2011-4885, CVE-2012-0021, CVE-2012-0027, CVE-2012-0031, CVE-2012-0036, CVE-2012-0053, CVE-2012-0057, CVE-2012-0830, CVE-2012-1165, CVE-2012-1823, CVE-2012-2012 (AUTOCOMPLETE enabled), CVE-2012-2013 (DoS), CVE-2012-2014 (Improper input validation), CVE-2012-2015 (Privilege Elevation), CVE-2012-2016 (Information disclosure), SSRT100336, SSRT100753, SSRT100669, SSRT100676, SSRT100695, SSRT100714, SSRT100760, SSRT100786, SSRT100787, SSRT100815, SSRT100840, SSRT100843, SSRT100869 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before v7.1.1 running on Linux and Windows. BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2012-2012 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:P) 9.7 CVE-2012-2013 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2012-2014 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:N) 6.8 CVE-2012-2015 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 6.5 CVE-2012-2016 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N) 4.4 CVE-2011-1944 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 9.3 CVE-2011-2821 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-2834 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 6.8 CVE-2011-3379 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-3607 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.4 CVE-2011-4078 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4108 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4153 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4317 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-4415 (AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 1.2 CVE-2011-4576 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4577 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 4.3 CVE-2011-4619 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4885 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0021 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2012-0027 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0031 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.6 CVE-2012-0036 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-0053 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-0057 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2012-0830 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2012-1165 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-1823 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 or subsequent to resolve the vulnerabilities. HP System Management Homepage v7.1.1 is available here: HP System Management Homepage for Windows x64 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4064%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-ab 0d4e9bb4654a8da503eccfd9%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Windows x86 [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4022%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-f7 c0d15d28474255bd0ec23136%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (AMD64/EM64T) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4035%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-18 d373dd1361400fbaca892942%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HP System Management Homepage for Linux (x86) [Download here] or enter the following URL into the browser address window. http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/swdDetail s/?sp4ts.oid=4091409&spf_p.tpst=psiSwdMain&spf_p.prp_psiSwdMain=wsrp-navigati onalState%3Dlang%253Den%257Ccc%253DUS%257CprodSeriesId%253D4091408%257CprodNa meId%253D4091409%257CswEnvOID%253D4006%257CswLang%253D8%257CswItem%253DMTX-9e 8a0188f97d48139dcb466509%257Cmode%253D3%257Caction%253DdriverDocument&javax.p ortlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vign ette.cachetoken HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) 26 June 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/p5ksACgkQ4B86/C0qfVkQpwCfbOEZmoo7myCkxQAdqQHevKG5 6IwAoPw4DI3YBCclyWuRekae7EFscAy0 =zd3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: OpenSSL: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: March 06, 2012 Bugs: #397695, #399365 ID: 201203-12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL, allowing remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service or obtain sensitive information. Background ========== OpenSSL is an Open Source toolkit implementing the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL v2/v3) and Transport Layer Security (TLS v1) as well as a general purpose cryptography library. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-libs/openssl < 1.0.0g *>= 0.9.8t >= 1.0.0g Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in OpenSSL: * Timing differences for decryption are exposed by CBC mode encryption in OpenSSL's implementation of DTLS (CVE-2011-4108). * An incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108 creates an unspecified vulnerability for DTLS applications using OpenSSL (CVE-2012-0050). Workaround ========== There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========== All OpenSSL users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0g" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2011-4108 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4108 [ 2 ] CVE-2011-4109 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4109 [ 3 ] CVE-2011-4576 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4576 [ 4 ] CVE-2011-4577 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4577 [ 5 ] CVE-2011-4619 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4619 [ 6 ] CVE-2012-0027 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0027 [ 7 ] CVE-2012-0050 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0050 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-12.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2012 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 . Content-Disposition: inline ==========================================================================Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1357-1 February 09, 2012 openssl vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 11.10 - Ubuntu 11.04 - Ubuntu 10.10 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in OpenSSL that could expose sensitive information or cause applications to crash. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and related cryptographic tools Details: It was discovered that the elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) subsystem in OpenSSL, when using the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for the ECDHE_ECDSA cipher suite, did not properly implement curves over binary fields. This could allow an attacker to determine private keys via a timing attack. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-1945) Adam Langley discovered that the ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) functionality in OpenSSL did not ensure thread safety while processing handshake messages from clients. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via out-of-order messages that violate the TLS protocol. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-3210) Nadhem Alfardan and Kenny Paterson discovered that the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) implementation in OpenSSL performed a MAC check only if certain padding is valid. This could allow a remote attacker to recover plaintext. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. (CVE-2011-4109) It was discovered that OpenSSL, in certain circumstances involving ECDH or ECDHE cipher suites, used an incorrect modular reduction algorithm in its implementation of the P-256 and P-384 NIST elliptic curves. This could allow a remote attacker to obtain the private key of a TLS server via multiple handshake attempts. This issue only affected Ubuntu 8.04 LTS. (CVE-2011-4576) Andrew Chi discovered that OpenSSL, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, could trigger an assert when handling an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with IP address blocks or Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 11.10. (CVE-2012-0027) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 11.10: libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 openssl 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 Ubuntu 11.04: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 openssl 0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 Ubuntu 10.10: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 openssl 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 openssl 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS: libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 openssl 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. References: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1357-1 CVE-2011-1945, CVE-2011-3210, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4109, CVE-2011-4354, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, CVE-2012-0027, CVE-2012-0050 Package Information: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/0.9.8o-5ubuntu1.2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.6 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.8 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/0.9.8g-4ubuntu3.15 . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 _______________________________________________________________________ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2012:007 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ _______________________________________________________________________ Package : openssl Date : January 16, 2012 Affected: 2011. The updated packages have been patched to correct these issues. _______________________________________________________________________ References: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4108 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4109 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4576 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4619 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0027 http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20120104.txt _______________________________________________________________________ Updated Packages: Mandriva Linux 2011: 2291c13c44539a5e25f58750a5d6bf8f 2011/i586/libopenssl1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm c610330d2c4c7397feb126247b1fa94f 2011/i586/libopenssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 36c86a84320e1c8a17a74e4e68bc7d5a 2011/i586/libopenssl-engines1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 4b8054f2c169d2b3223195053bd15802 2011/i586/libopenssl-static-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 3c48b209b941a83a6acfef439c3f78b7 2011/i586/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.i586.rpm 7af9d175d066db069aeb82248df9772b 2011/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2.src.rpm Mandriva Linux 2011/X86_64: 21a50bd2be83839266f033c9a0f0fabc 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 7e80ee8e2d445c5f1985cd52d2316658 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm e1f4faa3162a6bbc14b37e4cb8d1e8e2 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-engines1.0.0-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 6e3ac6d57cf0f4e13ed8e275a9bd2ff8 2011/x86_64/lib64openssl-static-devel-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm e9e0306f8dc9f398915a646547e262e2 2011/x86_64/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2-mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm 7af9d175d066db069aeb82248df9772b 2011/SRPMS/openssl-1.0.0d-2.2.src.rpm _______________________________________________________________________ To upgrade automatically use MandrivaUpdate or urpmi. The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. All packages are signed by Mandriva for security. You can obtain the GPG public key of the Mandriva Security Team by executing: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 0x22458A98 You can view other update advisories for Mandriva Linux at: http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact security_(at)_mandriva.com _______________________________________________________________________ Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Mandriva Security Team <security*mandriva.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPFFiBmqjQ0CJFipgRAkIUAJ9foScZELNgGkHUEaaSx9sgdWNMFwCgnsst eph27yO3eEECVX28+SNUKyw= =wTFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
VAR-201112-0349 No CVE vtiger CRM Database backup verification bypass vulnerability CVSS V2: -
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
Vtiger CRM is a Web-based Sales Capability Automation (SFA)-based Customer Relationship Management System (CRM). Some modules in vtiger CRM do not verify user access levels. An anonymous mode call can be made using the graph.php script, which can be used to view or modify certain configurations (organization name, template, backup). An attacker can download backup data to get sensitive information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Secunia is hiring! Find your next job here: http://secunia.com/company/jobs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE: vtiger CRM Database Backup Authentication Bypass Vulnerability SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA47367 VERIFY ADVISORY: Secunia.com http://secunia.com/advisories/47367/ Customer Area (Credentials Required) https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47367 RELEASE DATE: 2011-12-27 DISCUSS ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/47367/#comments AVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Last Update * Popularity * Comments * Criticality Level * Impact * Where * Solution Status * Operating System / Software * CVE Reference(s) http://secunia.com/advisories/47367/ ONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Authentication Level * Report Reliability * Secunia PoC * Secunia Analysis * Systems Affected * Approve Distribution * Remediation Status * Secunia CVSS Score * CVSS https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47367 ONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI: * AUTOMATED SCANNING http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/ DESCRIPTION: Francois Harvey has discovered a vulnerability in vtiger CRM, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. The vulnerability is caused due to the application allowing database backup requests via graph.php without checking credentials. The vulnerability is confirmed in version 5.2.1. Prior versions may also be affected. SOLUTION: Update to version 5.3.0. PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: Francois Harvey ORIGINAL ADVISORY: http://francoisharvey.ca/2011/12/advisory-meds-2011-01-vtigercrm-anonymous-access-to-setting-module/ OTHER REFERENCES: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ DEEP LINKS: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED DESCRIPTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED SOLUTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXPLOIT: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help private users keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities. Subscribe: http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/ Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/ Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR-201112-0123 CVE-2011-5035 Hash table implementations vulnerable to algorithmic complexity attacks

Related entries in the VARIoT exploits database: VAR-E-201102-0027, VAR-E-201112-0006, VAR-E-201112-0003, VAR-E-201112-0007, VAR-E-201112-0002, VAR-E-201112-0001, VAR-E-201111-0002, VAR-E-201111-0001, VAR-E-201108-0001, VAR-E-201108-0002, VAR-E-201105-0001, VAR-E-201105-0002, VAR-E-201110-0002, VAR-E-201110-0004, VAR-E-201112-0008, VAR-E-201112-0004, VAR-E-201110-0003, VAR-E-200607-0001, VAR-E-200607-0733
CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
Oracle Glassfish 2.1.1, 3.0.1, and 3.1.1, as used in Communications Server 2.0, Sun Java System Application Server 8.1 and 8.2, and possibly other products, computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters, aka Oracle security ticket S0104869. Some programming language implementations do not sufficiently randomize their hash functions or provide means to limit key collision attacks, which can be leveraged by an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. Oracle Glassfish Calculates the hash value of the form parameter without restricting the assumption of hash collision. (CPU Resource consumption ) There is a vulnerability that becomes a condition.A third party can send a large amount of crafted parameters to disrupt service operation. (CPU Resource consumption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. Oracle GlassFish Server is prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue by sending specially crafted forms in HTTP POST requests. Oracle GlassFish Server 3.1.1 and prior versions are vulnerable. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 APPLE-SA-2012-04-03-1 Java for OS X 2012-001 and Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 7 Java for OS X 2012-001 and Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 7 is now available and addresses the following: Java Available for: Mac OS X v10.6.8, Mac OS X Server v10.6.8, OS X Lion v10.7.3, OS X Lion Server v10.7.3 Impact: Multiple vulnerabilities in Java 1.6.0_29 Description: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in Java 1.6.0_29, the most serious of which may allow an untrusted Java applet to execute arbitrary code outside the Java sandbox. Visiting a web page containing a maliciously crafted untrusted Java applet may lead to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the current user. These issues are addressed by updating to Java version 1.6.0_31. Further information is available via the Java website at http://www.o racle.com/technetwork/java/javase/releasenotes-136954.html CVE-ID CVE-2011-3563 CVE-2011-5035 CVE-2012-0497 CVE-2012-0498 CVE-2012-0499 CVE-2012-0500 CVE-2012-0501 CVE-2012-0502 CVE-2012-0503 CVE-2012-0505 CVE-2012-0506 CVE-2012-0507 Java for OS X 2012-001 and Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 7 may be obtained from the Software Update pane in System Preferences, or Apple's Software Downloads web site: http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/ For Mac OS X v10.6 systems The download file is named: JavaForMacOSX10.6.dmg Its SHA-1 digest is: f76807153bc0ca253e4a466a2a8c0abf1e180667 For OS X Lion systems The download file is named: JavaForOSX.dmg Its SHA-1 digest is: 176ac1f8e79b4245301e84b616de5105ccd13e16 Information will also be posted to the Apple Security Updates web site: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1222 This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and details are available at: https://www.apple.com/support/security/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPezVqAAoJEGnF2JsdZQee7gIIALa7b5hVTKL7kOXF7EYT6wjx VnAmxoQbjEwpBkdzPzqqhCQ303/iBdLdHr2O/yxdaX0tFuB+5+4iInPU2t6O+PNh 7iJ3rhQszzIj5q/qGDXyzIQEjurNfvrEKAxQ3T7uj1At+n/9YVBaw8p6i+HopbRc Fo6Jrxy0Qf/MyeGO4lqxht2Aq8omh+pEBNP68EglqrJp/CjZTYGaFAHVGvnm8/gA wjcpIRQBacXcBCJ3K8pZhuQvXhm+GVLWYgc2KGsZ/l7jbQX5Bi67b7CFf7lBHlyd V7ss6N/0T/O3nspdhg+jhnvcaia1Ow3GikC/707NNkM8Dm3lm0DFVMBBgpNvPcU= =Pf96 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . In a typical operating environment, these are of low security risk as the runtime is not used on untrusted applets. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201406-32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: High Title: IcedTea JDK: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: June 29, 2014 Bugs: #312297, #330205, #340819, #346799, #352035, #353418, #354231, #355127, #370787, #387637, #404095, #421031, #429522, #433389, #438750, #442478, #457206, #458410, #461714, #466822, #477210, #489570, #508270 ID: 201406-32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in the IcedTea JDK, the worst of which could lead to arbitrary code execution. Background ========== IcedTea is a distribution of the Java OpenJDK source code built with free build tools. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-java/icedtea-bin < 6.1.13.3 >= 6.1.13.3 Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the IcedTea JDK. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact ====== A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process, cause a Denial of Service condition, obtain sensitive information, bypass intended security policies, or have other unspecified impact. Workaround ========== There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========== All IcedTea JDK users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-java/icedtea-bin-6.1.13.3" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2009-3555 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-3555 [ 2 ] CVE-2010-2548 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-2548 [ 3 ] CVE-2010-2783 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-2783 [ 4 ] CVE-2010-3541 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3541 [ 5 ] CVE-2010-3548 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3548 [ 6 ] CVE-2010-3549 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3549 [ 7 ] CVE-2010-3551 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3551 [ 8 ] CVE-2010-3553 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3553 [ 9 ] CVE-2010-3554 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3554 [ 10 ] CVE-2010-3557 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3557 [ 11 ] CVE-2010-3561 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3561 [ 12 ] CVE-2010-3562 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3562 [ 13 ] CVE-2010-3564 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3564 [ 14 ] CVE-2010-3565 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3565 [ 15 ] CVE-2010-3566 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3566 [ 16 ] CVE-2010-3567 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3567 [ 17 ] CVE-2010-3568 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3568 [ 18 ] CVE-2010-3569 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3569 [ 19 ] CVE-2010-3573 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3573 [ 20 ] CVE-2010-3574 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3574 [ 21 ] CVE-2010-3860 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3860 [ 22 ] CVE-2010-4351 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4351 [ 23 ] CVE-2010-4448 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4448 [ 24 ] CVE-2010-4450 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4450 [ 25 ] CVE-2010-4465 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4465 [ 26 ] CVE-2010-4467 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4467 [ 27 ] CVE-2010-4469 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4469 [ 28 ] CVE-2010-4470 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4470 [ 29 ] CVE-2010-4471 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4471 [ 30 ] CVE-2010-4472 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4472 [ 31 ] CVE-2010-4476 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4476 [ 32 ] CVE-2011-0025 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0025 [ 33 ] CVE-2011-0706 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0706 [ 34 ] CVE-2011-0815 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0815 [ 35 ] CVE-2011-0822 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0822 [ 36 ] CVE-2011-0862 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0862 [ 37 ] CVE-2011-0864 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0864 [ 38 ] CVE-2011-0865 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0865 [ 39 ] CVE-2011-0868 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0868 [ 40 ] CVE-2011-0869 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0869 [ 41 ] CVE-2011-0870 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0870 [ 42 ] CVE-2011-0871 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0871 [ 43 ] CVE-2011-0872 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0872 [ 44 ] CVE-2011-3389 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3389 [ 45 ] CVE-2011-3521 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3521 [ 46 ] CVE-2011-3544 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3544 [ 47 ] CVE-2011-3547 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3547 [ 48 ] CVE-2011-3548 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3548 [ 49 ] CVE-2011-3551 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3551 [ 50 ] CVE-2011-3552 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3552 [ 51 ] CVE-2011-3553 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3553 [ 52 ] CVE-2011-3554 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3554 [ 53 ] CVE-2011-3556 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3556 [ 54 ] CVE-2011-3557 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3557 [ 55 ] CVE-2011-3558 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3558 [ 56 ] CVE-2011-3560 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3560 [ 57 ] CVE-2011-3563 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3563 [ 58 ] CVE-2011-3571 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3571 [ 59 ] CVE-2011-5035 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-5035 [ 60 ] CVE-2012-0497 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0497 [ 61 ] CVE-2012-0501 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0501 [ 62 ] CVE-2012-0502 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0502 [ 63 ] CVE-2012-0503 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0503 [ 64 ] CVE-2012-0505 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0505 [ 65 ] CVE-2012-0506 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0506 [ 66 ] CVE-2012-0547 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0547 [ 67 ] CVE-2012-1711 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1711 [ 68 ] CVE-2012-1713 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1713 [ 69 ] CVE-2012-1716 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1716 [ 70 ] CVE-2012-1717 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1717 [ 71 ] CVE-2012-1718 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1718 [ 72 ] CVE-2012-1719 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1719 [ 73 ] CVE-2012-1723 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1723 [ 74 ] CVE-2012-1724 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1724 [ 75 ] CVE-2012-1725 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1725 [ 76 ] CVE-2012-1726 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1726 [ 77 ] CVE-2012-3216 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-3216 [ 78 ] CVE-2012-3422 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-3422 [ 79 ] CVE-2012-3423 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-3423 [ 80 ] CVE-2012-4416 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-4416 [ 81 ] CVE-2012-4540 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-4540 [ 82 ] CVE-2012-5068 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5068 [ 83 ] CVE-2012-5069 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5069 [ 84 ] CVE-2012-5070 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5070 [ 85 ] CVE-2012-5071 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5071 [ 86 ] CVE-2012-5072 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5072 [ 87 ] CVE-2012-5073 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5073 [ 88 ] CVE-2012-5074 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5074 [ 89 ] CVE-2012-5075 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5075 [ 90 ] CVE-2012-5076 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5076 [ 91 ] CVE-2012-5077 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5077 [ 92 ] CVE-2012-5081 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5081 [ 93 ] CVE-2012-5084 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5084 [ 94 ] CVE-2012-5085 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5085 [ 95 ] CVE-2012-5086 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5086 [ 96 ] CVE-2012-5087 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5087 [ 97 ] CVE-2012-5089 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5089 [ 98 ] CVE-2012-5979 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-5979 [ 99 ] CVE-2013-0169 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0169 [ 100 ] CVE-2013-0401 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0401 [ 101 ] CVE-2013-0424 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0424 [ 102 ] CVE-2013-0425 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0425 [ 103 ] CVE-2013-0426 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0426 [ 104 ] CVE-2013-0427 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0427 [ 105 ] CVE-2013-0428 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0428 [ 106 ] CVE-2013-0429 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0429 [ 107 ] CVE-2013-0431 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0431 [ 108 ] CVE-2013-0432 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0432 [ 109 ] CVE-2013-0433 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0433 [ 110 ] CVE-2013-0434 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0434 [ 111 ] CVE-2013-0435 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0435 [ 112 ] CVE-2013-0440 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0440 [ 113 ] CVE-2013-0441 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0441 [ 114 ] CVE-2013-0442 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0442 [ 115 ] CVE-2013-0443 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0443 [ 116 ] CVE-2013-0444 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0444 [ 117 ] CVE-2013-0450 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0450 [ 118 ] CVE-2013-0809 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-0809 [ 119 ] CVE-2013-1475 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1475 [ 120 ] CVE-2013-1476 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1476 [ 121 ] CVE-2013-1478 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1478 [ 122 ] CVE-2013-1480 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1480 [ 123 ] CVE-2013-1484 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1484 [ 124 ] CVE-2013-1485 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1485 [ 125 ] CVE-2013-1486 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1486 [ 126 ] CVE-2013-1488 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1488 [ 127 ] CVE-2013-1493 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1493 [ 128 ] CVE-2013-1500 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1500 [ 129 ] CVE-2013-1518 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1518 [ 130 ] CVE-2013-1537 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1537 [ 131 ] CVE-2013-1557 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1557 [ 132 ] CVE-2013-1569 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1569 [ 133 ] CVE-2013-1571 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-1571 [ 134 ] CVE-2013-2383 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2383 [ 135 ] CVE-2013-2384 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2384 [ 136 ] CVE-2013-2407 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2407 [ 137 ] CVE-2013-2412 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2412 [ 138 ] CVE-2013-2415 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2415 [ 139 ] CVE-2013-2417 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2417 [ 140 ] CVE-2013-2419 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2419 [ 141 ] CVE-2013-2420 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2420 [ 142 ] CVE-2013-2421 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2421 [ 143 ] CVE-2013-2422 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2422 [ 144 ] CVE-2013-2423 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2423 [ 145 ] CVE-2013-2424 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2424 [ 146 ] CVE-2013-2426 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2426 [ 147 ] CVE-2013-2429 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2429 [ 148 ] CVE-2013-2430 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2430 [ 149 ] CVE-2013-2431 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2431 [ 150 ] CVE-2013-2436 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2436 [ 151 ] CVE-2013-2443 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2443 [ 152 ] CVE-2013-2444 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2444 [ 153 ] CVE-2013-2445 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2445 [ 154 ] CVE-2013-2446 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2446 [ 155 ] CVE-2013-2447 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2447 [ 156 ] CVE-2013-2448 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2448 [ 157 ] CVE-2013-2449 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2449 [ 158 ] CVE-2013-2450 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2450 [ 159 ] CVE-2013-2451 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2451 [ 160 ] CVE-2013-2452 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2452 [ 161 ] CVE-2013-2453 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2453 [ 162 ] CVE-2013-2454 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2454 [ 163 ] CVE-2013-2455 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2455 [ 164 ] CVE-2013-2456 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2456 [ 165 ] CVE-2013-2457 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2457 [ 166 ] CVE-2013-2458 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2458 [ 167 ] CVE-2013-2459 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2459 [ 168 ] CVE-2013-2460 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2460 [ 169 ] CVE-2013-2461 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2461 [ 170 ] CVE-2013-2463 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2463 [ 171 ] CVE-2013-2465 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2465 [ 172 ] CVE-2013-2469 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2469 [ 173 ] CVE-2013-2470 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2470 [ 174 ] CVE-2013-2471 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2471 [ 175 ] CVE-2013-2472 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2472 [ 176 ] CVE-2013-2473 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-2473 [ 177 ] CVE-2013-3829 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-3829 [ 178 ] CVE-2013-4002 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4002 [ 179 ] CVE-2013-5772 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5772 [ 180 ] CVE-2013-5774 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5774 [ 181 ] CVE-2013-5778 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5778 [ 182 ] CVE-2013-5780 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5780 [ 183 ] CVE-2013-5782 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5782 [ 184 ] CVE-2013-5783 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5783 [ 185 ] CVE-2013-5784 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5784 [ 186 ] CVE-2013-5790 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5790 [ 187 ] CVE-2013-5797 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5797 [ 188 ] CVE-2013-5800 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5800 [ 189 ] CVE-2013-5802 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5802 [ 190 ] CVE-2013-5803 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5803 [ 191 ] CVE-2013-5804 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5804 [ 192 ] CVE-2013-5805 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5805 [ 193 ] CVE-2013-5806 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5806 [ 194 ] CVE-2013-5809 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5809 [ 195 ] CVE-2013-5814 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5814 [ 196 ] CVE-2013-5817 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5817 [ 197 ] CVE-2013-5820 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5820 [ 198 ] CVE-2013-5823 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5823 [ 199 ] CVE-2013-5825 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5825 [ 200 ] CVE-2013-5829 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5829 [ 201 ] CVE-2013-5830 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5830 [ 202 ] CVE-2013-5840 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5840 [ 203 ] CVE-2013-5842 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5842 [ 204 ] CVE-2013-5849 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5849 [ 205 ] CVE-2013-5850 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5850 [ 206 ] CVE-2013-5851 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-5851 [ 207 ] CVE-2013-6629 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-6629 [ 208 ] CVE-2013-6954 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-6954 [ 209 ] CVE-2014-0429 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0429 [ 210 ] CVE-2014-0446 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0446 [ 211 ] CVE-2014-0451 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0451 [ 212 ] CVE-2014-0452 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0452 [ 213 ] CVE-2014-0453 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0453 [ 214 ] CVE-2014-0456 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0456 [ 215 ] CVE-2014-0457 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0457 [ 216 ] CVE-2014-0458 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0458 [ 217 ] CVE-2014-0459 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0459 [ 218 ] CVE-2014-0460 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0460 [ 219 ] CVE-2014-0461 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0461 [ 220 ] CVE-2014-1876 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-1876 [ 221 ] CVE-2014-2397 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2397 [ 222 ] CVE-2014-2398 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2398 [ 223 ] CVE-2014-2403 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2403 [ 224 ] CVE-2014-2412 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2412 [ 225 ] CVE-2014-2414 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2414 [ 226 ] CVE-2014-2421 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2421 [ 227 ] CVE-2014-2423 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2423 [ 228 ] CVE-2014-2427 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-2427 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201406-32.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2014 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20564.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/ docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04047415 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c04047415 Version: 2 HPSBST02955 rev.2 - HP XP P9000 Performance Advisor Software, 3rd party Software Security - Apache Tomcat and Oracle Updates, Multiple Vulnerabilities Affecting Confidentiality, Availability And Integrity NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2014-02-24 Last Updated: 2014-03-04 Potential Security Impact: Multiple vulnerabilities affecting confidentiality, availability, and integrity Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified in 3rd party software used in HP XP P9000 Performance Advisor running Oracle and Apache Tomcat Software. HP has updated the Apache Tomcat and Oracle database software to address vulnerabilities affecting confidentiality, availability, and integrity. References: CVE-2013-0361 CVE-2013-0354 CVE-2013-0397 CVE-2012-3190 CVE-2013-0352 CVE-2012-3219 CVE-2013-0363 CVE-2013-0381 CVE-2011-5035 CVE-2013-0364 CVE-2013-0372 CVE-2013-0366 CVE-2009-2902 CVE-2009-2901 CVE-2009-2693 CVE-2009-3548 CVE-2010-2227 CVE-2010-1157 CVE-2010-3718 CVE-2011-0013 CVE-2010-4172 CVE-2011-3190 CVE-2011-1184 CVE-2011-5064 CVE-2011-5063 CVE-2011-5062 CVE-2007-5342 CVE-2007-6286 CVE-2007-5333 CVE-2008-0002 CVE-2007-5461 CVE-2011-2729 CVE-2011-2526 CVE-2011-2481 CVE-2011-2204 CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-3546 CVE-2011-0534 CVE-2008-2370 CVE-2008-1947 CVE-2008-1232, CPU-JAN-2013, SSRT101157 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP XP P9000 Performance Advisor Software v5.4.1 and earlier BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2007-5333 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2007-5342 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2007-5461 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N) 3.5 CVE-2007-6286 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2008-0002 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 5.8 CVE-2008-1232 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2008-1947 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2008-2370 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2009-2693 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P) 5.8 CVE-2009-2901 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2009-2902 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2009-3548 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2010-1157 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 2.6 CVE-2010-2227 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P) 6.4 CVE-2010-3718 (AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 1.2 CVE-2010-4172 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-0013 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-0534 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-1184 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-2204 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 1.9 CVE-2011-2481 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.6 CVE-2011-2526 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 4.4 CVE-2011-2729 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-3190 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P) 7.5 CVE-2011-5035 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-5062 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-5063 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2011-5064 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-2733 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-3190 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2012-3219 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-3546 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-4431 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2012-4534 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 2.6 CVE-2013-0352 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2013-0354 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2013-0361 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 10.0 CVE-2013-0363 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N) 7.8 CVE-2013-0364 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N) 7.8 CVE-2013-0366 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C) 10.0 CVE-2013-0372 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 4.3 CVE-2013-0381 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 CVE-2013-0397 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N) 6.4 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided a software update, HP XP P9000 Performance Advisor Software v5.5.1 to resolve this issue. To obtain the update, go to http://www.hp.com : Select "Support" Select "Download Drivers" Search "find by product" for "HP P9000 Performance Advisor Software" Select "HP P9000 Performance Advisor Software" and then choose the operating system Download "HP StorageWorks P9000 Performance Advisor Software" v5.5.1 HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) - 24 February 2014 Initial release Version:2 (rev.2) - 4 March 2014 Updated Potential Security Impact section Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: https://h20564.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits; damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. ============================================================================ Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1373-2 March 01, 2012 openjdk-6b18 vulnerabilities ============================================================================ A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 11.04 - Ubuntu 10.10 - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Summary: Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenJDK 6 for the ARM architecture have been fixed. Software Description: - openjdk-6b18: Open Source Java implementation Details: USN 1373-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenJDK 6 in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04 for all architectures except for ARM (armel). This provides the corresponding OpenJDK 6 update for use with the ARM (armel) architecture in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. A remote attacker could cause a denial of service by sending special requests that trigger hash collisions predictably. This may be increased by adjusting the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that an off-by-one error exists in the Java ZIP file processing code. An attacker could us this to cause a denial of service through a maliciously crafted ZIP file. (CVE-2012-0507) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 11.04: icedtea-6-jre-cacao 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 icedtea-6-jre-jamvm 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 openjdk-6-jre-zero 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~11.04.1 Ubuntu 10.10: icedtea-6-jre-cacao 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.10.1 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.10.1 openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.10.1 openjdk-6-jre-zero 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.10.1 Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: icedtea-6-jre-cacao 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.04.1 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.04.1 openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.04.1 openjdk-6-jre-zero 6b18-1.8.13-0ubuntu1~10.04.1 After a standard system update you need to restart any Java applications or applets to make all the necessary changes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Critical: java-1.6.0-openjdk security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0135-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0135.html Issue date: 2012-02-14 CVE Names: CVE-2011-3563 CVE-2011-3571 CVE-2011-5035 CVE-2012-0497 CVE-2012-0501 CVE-2012-0502 CVE-2012-0503 CVE-2012-0505 CVE-2012-0506 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 3. Description: These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially-crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially-crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) Note: If the web browser plug-in provided by the icedtea-web package was installed, the issues exposed via Java applets could have been exploited without user interaction if a user visited a malicious website. This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect. 4. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-11259 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 788606 - CVE-2011-5035 OpenJDK: HttpServer no header count limit (Lightweight HTTP Server, 7126960) 788624 - CVE-2012-0501 OpenJDK: off-by-one bug in ZIP reading code (JRE, 7118283) 788976 - CVE-2012-0503 OpenJDK: unrestricted use of TimeZone.setDefault() (i18n, 7110687) 788994 - CVE-2011-3571 OpenJDK: AtomicReferenceArray insufficient array type check (Concurrency, 7082299) 789295 - CVE-2011-3563 OpenJDK: JavaSound incorrect bounds check (Sound, 7088367) 789297 - CVE-2012-0502 OpenJDK: KeyboardFocusManager focus stealing (AWT, 7110683) 789299 - CVE-2012-0505 OpenJDK: incomplete info in the deserialization exception (Serialization, 7110700) 789300 - CVE-2012-0506 OpenJDK: mutable repository identifiers (CORBA, 7110704) 789301 - CVE-2012-0497 OpenJDK: insufficient checking of the graphics rendering object (2D, 7112642) 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Client/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6ComputeNode/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.src.rpm i386: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.i686.rpm x86_64: java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-3563.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-3571.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-5035.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0497.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0501.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0502.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0503.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0505.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0506.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#critical http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.10/file/icedtea6-1.10.6/NEWS http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpufeb2012-366318.html 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPOwEiXlSAg2UNWIIRAnYKAKCorWMpTAsiiuJ4uSywvmAym2EK0wCfa/8B lhqpUTdPMNmgswBpMj4pV/M= =9liL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Fix in AtomicReferenceArray (CVE-2011-3571). Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors (CVE-2012-0498. CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500). Issues with some KeyboardFocusManager method (CVE-2012-0502). Issues with TimeZone class (CVE-2012-0503). Enhance exception throwing mechanism in ObjectStreamClass (CVE-2012-0505). Issues with some method in corba (CVE-2012-0506). The verification of md5 checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you. You can obtain the GPG public key of the Mandriva Security Team by executing: gpg --recv-keys --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 0x22458A98 You can view other update advisories for Mandriva Linux at: http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact security_(at)_mandriva.com _______________________________________________________________________ Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Mandriva Security Team <security*mandriva.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPPnJ1mqjQ0CJFipgRAsShAJ9uLjzWi9Y8x/myvScmQfUPwRh8RACg22f9 NSDNWCT+JqEyYHUExPAwR58= =cwgS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . Further information about these flaws can be found on the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch page, listed in the References section
VAR-201201-0259 CVE-2011-4858 Hash table implementations vulnerable to algorithmic complexity attacks

Related entries in the VARIoT exploits database: VAR-E-200607-0001, VAR-E-200607-0733
CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
Apache Tomcat before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.35, and 7.x before 7.0.23 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters. Some programming language implementations do not sufficiently randomize their hash functions or provide means to limit key collision attacks, which can be leveraged by an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. Multiple Hitachi COBOL2002 products have security vulnerabilities that allow attackers to take control of target user systems. No detailed vulnerability details are provided at this time. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201206-24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: Apache Tomcat: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: June 24, 2012 Bugs: #272566, #273662, #303719, #320963, #329937, #373987, #374619, #382043, #386213, #396401, #399227 ID: 201206-24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Apache Tomcat, the worst of which allowing to read, modify and overwrite arbitrary files. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 www-servers/tomcat *< 5.5.34 *>= 6.0.35 *< 6.0.35 >= 7.0.23 < 7.0.23 Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Apache Tomcat. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact ====== The vulnerabilities allow an attacker to cause a Denial of Service, to hijack a session, to bypass authentication, to inject webscript, to enumerate valid usernames, to read, modify and overwrite arbitrary files, to bypass intended access restrictions, to delete work-directory files, to discover the server's hostname or IP, to bypass read permissions for files or HTTP headers, to read or write files outside of the intended working directory, and to obtain sensitive information by reading a log file. Workaround ========== There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========== All Apache Tomcat 6.0.x users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-servers/tomcat-6.0.35" All Apache Tomcat 7.0.x users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-servers/tomcat-7.0.23" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2008-5515 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-5515 [ 2 ] CVE-2009-0033 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-0033 [ 3 ] CVE-2009-0580 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-0580 [ 4 ] CVE-2009-0781 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-0781 [ 5 ] CVE-2009-0783 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-0783 [ 6 ] CVE-2009-2693 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2693 [ 7 ] CVE-2009-2901 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2901 [ 8 ] CVE-2009-2902 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2902 [ 9 ] CVE-2010-1157 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1157 [ 10 ] CVE-2010-2227 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-2227 [ 11 ] CVE-2010-3718 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3718 [ 12 ] CVE-2010-4172 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4172 [ 13 ] CVE-2010-4312 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-4312 [ 14 ] CVE-2011-0013 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0013 [ 15 ] CVE-2011-0534 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0534 [ 16 ] CVE-2011-1088 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1088 [ 17 ] CVE-2011-1183 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1183 [ 18 ] CVE-2011-1184 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1184 [ 19 ] CVE-2011-1419 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1419 [ 20 ] CVE-2011-1475 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1475 [ 21 ] CVE-2011-1582 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1582 [ 22 ] CVE-2011-2204 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2204 [ 23 ] CVE-2011-2481 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2481 [ 24 ] CVE-2011-2526 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2526 [ 25 ] CVE-2011-2729 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2729 [ 26 ] CVE-2011-3190 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3190 [ 27 ] CVE-2011-3375 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-3375 [ 28 ] CVE-2011-4858 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-4858 [ 29 ] CVE-2011-5062 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-5062 [ 30 ] CVE-2011-5063 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-5063 [ 31 ] CVE-2011-5064 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-5064 [ 32 ] CVE-2012-0022 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0022 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-24.xml Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2012 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 . Release Date: 2012-02-06 Last Updated: 2012-02-06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Potential Security Impact: Remote Denial of Service (DoS), access restriction bypass Source: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP Software Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY Potential security vulnerabilities have been identified with HP-UX Apache Running Tomcat Servlet Engine. These vulnerabilities could be exploited remotely to create a Denial of Service (DoS) or to perform an access restriction bypass. References: CVE-2006-7243, CVE-2011-4858, CVE-2011-4885, CVE-2012-0022 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HP-UX B.11.23, B.11.31 running HP-UX Apache Web Server Suite v3.21 or earlier BACKGROUND CVSS 2.0 Base Metrics =========================================================== Reference Base Vector Base Score CVE-2006-7243 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N) 5.0 CVE-2011-4858 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2011-4885 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 CVE-2012-0022 (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P) 5.0 =========================================================== Information on CVSS is documented in HP Customer Notice: HPSN-2008-002 RESOLUTION HP has provided the following software updates to resolve the vulnerability. The updates are available for download from ftp://srt10728:Secure12@ftp.usa.hp.com Note: HP-UX Web Server Suite v3.22 contains HP-UX Tomcat-based Servlet Engine v5.5.35.01 Web Server Suite Version Apache Depot Name HP-UX Web Server Suite v.3.22 HP-UX B.11.23 HPUXWS22ATW-B322-64.depot HP-UX B.11.23 HPUXWS22ATW-B322-32.depot HP-UX B.11.31 HPUXWS22ATW-B322-64.depot HP-UX B.11.31 HPUXWS22ATW-B322-32.depot MANUAL ACTIONS: Yes - Update Install HP-UX Web Server Suite v3.22 or subsequent. PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION HP-UX Software Assistant: HP-UX Software Assistant is an enhanced application that replaces HP-UX Security Patch Check. It analyzes all Security Bulletins issued by HP and lists recommended actions that may apply to a specific HP-UX system. It can also download patches and create a depot automatically. For more information see https://www.hp.com/go/swa The following text is for use by the HP-UX Software Assistant. AFFECTED VERSIONS HP-UX Web Server Suite HP-UX B.11.23 HP-UX B.11.31 ================== hpuxws22TOMCAT.TOMCAT action: install revision B.5.5.35.01 or subsequent hpuxws22APCH32.APACHE hpuxws22APCH32.APACHE2 hpuxws22APCH32.AUTH_LDAP hpuxws22APCH32.AUTH_LDAP2 hpuxws22APCH32.MOD_JK hpuxws22APCH32.MOD_JK2 hpuxws22APCH32.MOD_PERL hpuxws22APCH32.MOD_PERL2 hpuxws22APCH32.PHP hpuxws22APCH32.PHP2 hpuxws22APCH32.WEBPROXY action: install revision B.2.2.15.11 or subsequent END AFFECTED VERSION HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) - 06 February 2012 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running HP software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HP Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hp.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability with any HP supported product, send Email to: security-alert@hp.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HP Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://h41183.www4.hp.com/signup_alerts.php?jumpid=hpsc_secbulletins Security Bulletin List: A list of HP Security Bulletins, updated periodically, is contained in HP Security Notice HPSN-2011-001: https://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=emr_na-c02964430 Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/secBullArchive/ Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HP General Software HF = HP Hardware and Firmware MP = MPE/iX MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PI = Printing and Imaging PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software TU = Tru64 UNIX UX = HP-UX Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Hewlett-Packard Company shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits;damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett-Packard Company and the names of Hewlett-Packard products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Moderate: tomcat6 security and bug fix update Advisory ID: RHSA-2012:0682-01 Product: JBoss Enterprise Web Server Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0682.html Issue date: 2012-05-21 CVE Names: CVE-2011-1184 CVE-2011-2204 CVE-2011-2526 CVE-2011-3190 CVE-2011-3375 CVE-2011-4858 CVE-2011-5062 CVE-2011-5063 CVE-2011-5064 CVE-2012-0022 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: Updated tomcat6 packages that fix multiple security issues and three bugs are now available for JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0.2 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0 for RHEL 5 Server - noarch JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0 for RHEL 6 Server - noarch 3. Description: Apache Tomcat is a servlet container. JBoss Enterprise Web Server includes the Tomcat Native library, providing Apache Portable Runtime (APR) support for Tomcat. References in this text to APR refer to the Tomcat Native implementation, not any other apr package. This update fixes the JBPAPP-4873, JBPAPP-6133, and JBPAPP-6852 bugs. It also resolves the following security issues: Multiple flaws weakened the Tomcat HTTP DIGEST authentication implementation, subjecting it to some of the weaknesses of HTTP BASIC authentication, for example, allowing remote attackers to perform session replay attacks. (CVE-2011-1184, CVE-2011-5062, CVE-2011-5063, CVE-2011-5064) A flaw was found in the way the Coyote (org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProcessor) and APR (org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpAprProcessor) Tomcat AJP (Apache JServ Protocol) connectors processed certain POST requests. An attacker could send a specially-crafted request that would cause the connector to treat the message body as a new request. This allows arbitrary AJP messages to be injected, possibly allowing an attacker to bypass a web application's authentication checks and gain access to information they would otherwise be unable to access. The JK (org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler) connector is used by default when the APR libraries are not present. The JK connector is not affected by this flaw. (CVE-2011-3190) A flaw in the way Tomcat recycled objects that contain data from user requests (such as IP addresses and HTTP headers) when certain errors occurred. If a user sent a request that caused an error to be logged, Tomcat would return a reply to the next request (which could be sent by a different user) with data from the first user's request, leading to information disclosure. Under certain conditions, a remote attacker could leverage this flaw to hijack sessions. (CVE-2011-3375) The Java hashCode() method implementation was susceptible to predictable hash collisions. This update introduces a limit on the number of parameters processed per request to mitigate this issue. The default limit is 512 for parameters and 128 for headers. These defaults can be changed by setting the org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Parameters.MAX_COUNT and org.apache.tomcat.util.http.MimeHeaders.MAX_COUNT system properties. (CVE-2011-4858) Tomcat did not handle large numbers of parameters and large parameter values efficiently. A remote attacker could make Tomcat use an excessive amount of CPU time by sending an HTTP request containing a large number of parameters or large parameter values. This update introduces limits on the number of parameters and headers processed per request to address this issue. Refer to the CVE-2011-4858 description for information about the org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Parameters.MAX_COUNT and org.apache.tomcat.util.http.MimeHeaders.MAX_COUNT system properties. (CVE-2012-0022) A flaw in the Tomcat MemoryUserDatabase. If a runtime exception occurred when creating a new user with a JMX client, that user's password was logged to Tomcat log files. Note: By default, only administrators have access to such log files. (CVE-2011-2204) A flaw in the way Tomcat handled sendfile request attributes when using the HTTP APR or NIO (Non-Blocking I/O) connector. A malicious web application running on a Tomcat instance could use this flaw to bypass security manager restrictions and gain access to files it would otherwise be unable to access, or possibly terminate the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). The HTTP NIO connector is used by default in JBoss Enterprise Web Server. (CVE-2011-2526) Red Hat would like to thank oCERT for reporting CVE-2011-4858, and the Apache Tomcat project for reporting CVE-2011-2526. oCERT acknowledges Julian Wälde and Alexander Klink as the original reporters of CVE-2011-4858. 4. Solution: Users of Tomcat should upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. Tomcat must be restarted for this update to take effect. Before applying this update, make sure all previously-released errata relevant to your system have been applied. This update is available via the Red Hat Network. Details on how to use the Red Hat Network to apply this update are available at https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/articles/11258 5. Bugs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 717013 - CVE-2011-2204 tomcat: password disclosure vulnerability 720948 - CVE-2011-2526 tomcat: security manager restrictions bypass 734868 - CVE-2011-3190 tomcat: authentication bypass and information disclosure 741401 - CVE-2011-1184 CVE-2011-5062 CVE-2011-5063 CVE-2011-5064 tomcat: Multiple weaknesses in HTTP DIGEST authentication 750521 - CVE-2011-4858 tomcat: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS (oCERT-2011-003) 782624 - CVE-2011-3375 tomcat: information disclosure due to improper response and request object recycling 783359 - CVE-2012-0022 tomcat: large number of parameters DoS 6. Package List: JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0 for RHEL 5 Server: Source: tomcat6-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.src.rpm noarch: tomcat6-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-admin-webapps-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-docs-webapp-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-el-1.0-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-javadoc-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-jsp-2.1-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-lib-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-log4j-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-servlet-2.5-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm tomcat6-webapps-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el5.noarch.rpm JBoss Enterprise Web Server 1.0 for RHEL 6 Server: Source: tomcat6-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.src.rpm noarch: tomcat6-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-admin-webapps-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-docs-webapp-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-el-1.0-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-javadoc-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-jsp-2.1-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-lib-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-log4j-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-servlet-2.5-api-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm tomcat6-webapps-6.0.32-24_patch_07.ep5.el6.noarch.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/#package 7. References: https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-1184.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-2204.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-2526.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-3190.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-3375.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-4858.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-5062.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-5063.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2011-5064.html https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2012-0022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-4873 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6133 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6852 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2012 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPunmrXlSAg2UNWIIRAkA4AKCTaGA0dlkzcdXw8BMDz6i6Kk31iQCbBwk5 HGbJnvqJAVX57f9/Kpj3+R4= =pyZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . A flaw was found in the way JBoss Web handled UTF-8 surrogate pair characters. If JBoss Web was hosting an application with UTF-8 character encoding enabled, or that included user-supplied UTF-8 strings in a response, a remote attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) on the JBoss Web server. Warning: Before applying this update, back up your JBoss Enterprise Application Platform's "jboss-as/server/[PROFILE]/deploy/" directory, along with all other customized configuration files. It comprises a set of offerings for enterprise customers who are looking for pre-configured profiles of JBoss Enterprise Middleware components that have been tested and certified together to provide an integrated experience. Refer to the JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 4.3 CP07 Release Notes, available shortly from docs.redhat.com, for information on the most significant bug fixes included in this release. The following security fixes are also included: JBoss Seam 2 did not properly block access to JBoss Expression Language (EL) constructs in page exception handling, allowing arbitrary Java methods to be executed. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code via a specially-crafted URL provided to certain applications based on the JBoss Seam 2 framework. Note: A properly configured and enabled Java Security Manager would prevent exploitation of this flaw. (CVE-2011-1484) Note: If you have created custom applications that are packaged with a copy of the JBoss Seam 2 library, those applications must be rebuilt with the updated jboss-seam.jar file provided by this update. (CVE-2011-1184, CVE-2011-5062, CVE-2011-5063, CVE-2011-5064) The invoker servlets, deployed by default via httpha-invoker, only performed access control on the HTTP GET and POST methods, allowing remote attackers to make unauthenticated requests by using different HTTP methods. Due to the second layer of authentication provided by a security interceptor, this issue is not exploitable on default installations unless an administrator has misconfigured the security interceptor or disabled it. Solution: The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Note that if you have created custom applications that are packaged with a copy of the JBoss Seam 2 library, those applications must be rebuilt with the updated jboss-seam.jar file provided by this update. Relevant releases/architectures: RHEL Desktop Workstation (v. 5 client) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 server) - i386, ia64, ppc, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 client) - i386, x86_64 3. 5 client): Source: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.src.rpm i386: tomcat5-debuginfo-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.i386.rpm tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.i386.rpm tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.i386.rpm x86_64: tomcat5-debuginfo-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.x86_64.rpm tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.x86_64.rpm tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.31.el5_8.x86_64.rpm RHEL Desktop Workstation (v. Description: The JBoss Communications Platform (JBCP) is an open source VoIP platform certified for JAIN SLEE 1.1 and SIP Servlets 1.1 compliance. JBCP serves as a high performance core for Service Delivery Platforms (SDPs) and IP Multimedia Subsystems (IMSs) by leveraging J2EE to enable the convergence of data and video in Next-Generation Intelligent Network (NGIN) applications. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Secunia is hiring! Find your next job here: http://secunia.com/company/jobs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE: Hitachi COBOL2002 Products Unspecified Vulnerability SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA47612 VERIFY ADVISORY: Secunia.com http://secunia.com/advisories/47612/ Customer Area (Credentials Required) https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47612 RELEASE DATE: 2012-01-20 DISCUSS ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/47612/#comments AVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Last Update * Popularity * Comments * Criticality Level * Impact * Where * Solution Status * Operating System / Software * CVE Reference(s) http://secunia.com/advisories/47612/ ONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Authentication Level * Report Reliability * Secunia PoC * Secunia Analysis * Systems Affected * Approve Distribution * Remediation Status * Secunia CVSS Score * CVSS https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47612 ONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI: * AUTOMATED SCANNING http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/ DESCRIPTION: Hitachi has reported a vulnerability in some COBOL2002 products, which can be exploited by malicious users to compromise a vulnerable system. The vulnerability is caused due to an unspecified error. No further information is currently available. PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: Reported by the vendor. ORIGINAL ADVISORY: http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/global/security/info/vuls/HS12-002/index.html OTHER REFERENCES: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ DEEP LINKS: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED DESCRIPTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED SOLUTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXPLOIT: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help private users keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities. Subscribe: http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/ Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/ Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR-201112-0360 No CVE D-Link DSL-500T ADSL Router Remote Vulnerability CVSS V2: -
CVSS V3: -
Severity: -
The DSL-500T is an ADSL2 terminal with routing function. It is connected to a computer via an Ethernet interface and has powerful routing functions. It is ideal for home, office and SOHO users. D-Link DSL-500T ADSL routers have predictable resource locations, brute force guesses, and cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities that can be exploited by malicious users to change router settings, brute force passwords, perform CSRF attacks, and remote logins.
VAR-201112-0187 CVE-2011-4723 D-Link DIR-300 Vulnerability to obtain important information in router CVSS V2: 6.8
CVSS V3: 5.7
Severity: MEDIUM
The D-Link DIR-300 router stores cleartext passwords, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. D-Link is a network company founded by Taiwan D-Link Group, dedicated to the R&D, production and marketing of LAN, broadband network, wireless network, voice network and related network equipment. D-Link DIR-300 routers are vulnerable to encryption issues
VAR-201112-0148 CVE-2011-4050 7-Technologies Interactive Graphical SCADA System Data Server Remote Denial Of Service Vulnerability CVSS V2: 5.0
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
Buffer overflow in 7-Technologies (7T) Interactive Graphical SCADA System (IGSS) 9.0.0.11200 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted packet to TCP port 12401. The 7T Interactive Graphical SCADA System is an automated monitoring and control system. Attackers can exploit this issue to crash the application, denying service to legitimate users. 7-Technologies Interactive Graphical SCADA System 9.0.0.11200 is affected; other versions may also be vulnerable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Secunia is hiring! Find your next job here: http://secunia.com/company/jobs/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TITLE: 7-Technologies Interactive Graphical SCADA System Data Server Denial of Service SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA47327 VERIFY ADVISORY: Secunia.com http://secunia.com/advisories/47327/ Customer Area (Credentials Required) https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47327 RELEASE DATE: 2011-12-21 DISCUSS ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/47327/#comments AVAILABLE ON SITE AND IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Last Update * Popularity * Comments * Criticality Level * Impact * Where * Solution Status * Operating System / Software * CVE Reference(s) http://secunia.com/advisories/47327/ ONLY AVAILABLE IN CUSTOMER AREA: * Authentication Level * Report Reliability * Secunia PoC * Secunia Analysis * Systems Affected * Approve Distribution * Remediation Status * Secunia CVSS Score * CVSS https://ca.secunia.com/?page=viewadvisory&vuln_id=47327 ONLY AVAILABLE WITH SECUNIA CSI AND SECUNIA PSI: * AUTOMATED SCANNING http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/personal/ http://secunia.com/vulnerability_scanning/corporate/wsus_sccm_3rd_third_party_patching/ DESCRIPTION: A vulnerability has been reported in 7-Technologies Interactive Graphical SCADA System, which can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service). The vulnerability is reported in version 9.0.0.11200. SOLUTION: Apply patch. Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: ICS-CERT credits UCQ, Cyber Defense Institute, Inc. ORIGINAL ADVISORY: ICS-CERT: http://www.us-cert.gov/control_systems/pdf/ICSA-11-335-01.pdf OTHER REFERENCES: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ DEEP LINKS: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED DESCRIPTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXTENDED SOLUTION: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ EXPLOIT: Further details available in Customer Area: http://secunia.com/vulnerability_intelligence/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help private users keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities. Subscribe: http://secunia.com/advisories/secunia_security_advisories/ Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/advisories/about_secunia_advisories/ Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR-201112-0250 CVE-2011-4856 Parallels Plesk Panel Design Error Vulnerability CVSS V2: 9.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: HIGH
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 sends incorrect Content-Type headers for certain resources, which might allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by leveraging an interpretation conflict involving admin/health/parameters and certain other files. NOTE: it is possible that only clients, not the Plesk product, could be affected by this issue. A remote attacker can cause an unexplained impact by exploiting an interpretation conflict that includes admin/health/parameters and some other file
VAR-201112-0249 CVE-2011-4855 Parallels Plesk Panel Design Error Vulnerability CVSS V2: 9.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: HIGH
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 omits the Content-Type header's charset parameter for certain resources, which might allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by leveraging an interpretation conflict involving admin/customer-service-plan/list/reset-search/true/ and certain other files. NOTE: it is possible that only clients, not the Plesk product, could be affected by this issue. There is a vulnerability in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18. A remote attacker can cause an unexplained impact by exploiting an interpretation conflict that includes admin/customer-service-plan/list/reset-search/true/ and some other file
VAR-201112-0248 CVE-2011-4854 Parallels Plesk Panel Design Error Vulnerability CVSS V2: 9.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: HIGH
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 does not ensure that Content-Type HTTP headers match the corresponding Content-Type data in HTML META elements, which might allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by leveraging an interpretation conflict involving the get_enabled_product_icon program. NOTE: it is possible that only clients, not the Plesk product, could be affected by this issue. A remote attacker can cause an unexplained impact by exploiting an interpretation conflict that includes the get_enabled_product_icon program
VAR-201112-0247 CVE-2011-4853 Parallels Plesk Panel Information Disclosure Vulnerability CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 includes an RFC 1918 IP address within a web page, which allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information by reading this page, as demonstrated by smb/user/list-data/items-per-page/ and certain other files
VAR-201112-0246 CVE-2011-4852 Parallels Plesk Panel Information Disclosure Vulnerability CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 generates web pages containing external links in response to GET requests with query strings for enterprise/mobile-monitor/ and certain other files, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading (1) web-server access logs or (2) web-server Referer logs, related to a "cross-domain Referer leakage" issue. request
VAR-201112-0245 CVE-2011-4851 Parallels Plesk Panel Trust Management Vulnerability CVSS V2: 9.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: HIGH
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 generates a password form field without disabling the autocomplete feature, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging an unattended workstation, as demonstrated by forms in server/google-tools/ and certain other files. There is a vulnerability in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18, and the Control Panel is not disabled. The AutoComplete function generates a password form field
VAR-201112-0244 CVE-2011-4850 Parallels Plesk Panel Information Disclosure Vulnerability CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for a cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie, as demonstrated by cookies used by help.php and certain other files
VAR-201112-0243 CVE-2011-4849 Parallels Plesk Panel of Control Panel In Cookie Vulnerability that is captured CVSS V2: 4.3
CVSS V3: -
Severity: MEDIUM
The Control Panel in Parallels Plesk Panel 10.4.4_build20111103.18 does not set the secure flag for a cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session, as demonstrated by cookies used by help.php and certain other files