VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

The user's password is generated using a simpler algorithm , The attacker can obtain the highest authentication authority directly after analysis and cracking ( root ) Permissions

Telnet Weak password vulnerability, allowing weak password login

SSH Weak password vulnerability, allowing weak password login

The web GUI on Cisco Small Business 500 devices 1.2.0.92 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCul65330. A security vulnerability exists in the WebGUI of CiscoSmallBusiness500Device, which can be denied by a remote attacker by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. An attacker can exploit this issue to cause denial-of-service conditions. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCul65330

SQL injection vulnerability in the web-based management interface on Cisco RV220W devices allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted header in an HTTP request, aka Bug ID CSCuv29574. The Cisco RV220W is a wireless VPN firewall router product from Cisco Systems, USA. Cisco RV220W devices are prone to an authentication-bypass vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to bypass the authentication mechanism and perform unauthorized actions. This may lead to further attacks. This issue is tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuv29574

cifs-ao in the CIFS optimization functionality on Cisco Wide Area Application Service (WAAS) and Virtual WAAS (vWAAS) devices 5.x before 5.3.5d and 5.4 and 5.5 before 5.5.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption and device reload) via crafted network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCus85330. Cisco Wide Area Application Services is prone to a remote denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to reload the affected device, denying service to legitimate users. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCus85330. WAAS is a set of WAN link acceleration software. This software is mainly used in the link environment with small bandwidth and large delay. vWAAS is a cloud-based WAN optimization solution. The solution supports the use of policy-based on-demand business processes to accelerate private and virtual private cloud infrastructure and application delivery. There is a security vulnerability in cifs-ao in the CIFS optimization feature of Cisco WAAS and vWAAS. The following products and versions are affected: Cisco WAAS and vWAAS 5.3.5d prior to 5.x releases, 5.4 releases, 5.5.3 prior to 5.5 releases

The web-management GUI implementation on Cisco Small Business SG300 devices 1.4.1.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (HTTPS outage) via crafted HTTPS requests, aka Bug ID CSCuw87174. CiscoSmallBusinessSG300 is the SG300 series of intelligent switches from Cisco. Cisco Small Business SG300 Managed Switch is prone to a remote denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to cause denial-of-service conditions. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuw87174

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Unity Connection (UC) 10.5(2.3009) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCux82582. An attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This can allow the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. This issue is being tracked by following Cisco Bug ID's CSCux82576 CSCux82582 CSCux82587 CSCux82590 CSCux82602 CSCux82608. The platform can use voice commands to make calls or listen to messages "hands-free"

Ipswitch MOVEit File Transfer (formerly DMZ) 8.1 and earlier, when configured to support file view on download, allows remote authenticated users to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by uploading HTML files. Ipswitch MOVEit File Transfer is prone to an HTML-injection vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input. Successful exploits will allow attacker-supplied HTML and script code to run in the context of the affected browser, potentially allowing the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials or to control how the site is rendered to the user. Other attacks are also possible. Ipswitch MOVEit File Transfer versions 8.1 and prior are vulnerable. The system supports control, management, and visibility into all business-critical file transfer activities through a single, secure system

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.An arbitrary script may be executed on user's web browser. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions

Open redirect vulnerability on KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.A user may be transferred to the external website specified by an attacker. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions

CRLF injection vulnerability on KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via unspecified vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.An HTTP response splitting attack may result in arbitrary cookie values. A CRLF injection vulnerability exists in previous versions of KDDIHOMESPOTCUBE2. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions. Note- HOME SPOT CUBE2 is not affected by these vulnerabilities

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.An arbitrary administrative operation such as setting alteration may be executed. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized operations. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions. Note- HOME SPOT CUBE2 is not affected by these vulnerabilities

KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.An arbitrary administrative operation such as setting alteration may be executed. A security vulnerability exists in previous versions of KDDIHOMESPOTCUBE2. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary OS commands. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions

KDDI HOME SPOT CUBE devices before 2 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors. HOME SPOT CUBE provided by KDDI CORPORATION is a wireless LAN router. HOME SPOT CUBE contains an OS command injection vulnerability. Masaki Yoshikawa of LAC Co., Ltd. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.An arbitrary OS command may be executed with the privileges of the application. A security vulnerability exists in previous versions of KDDIHOMESPOTCUBE2. KDDI Home Spot Cube is prone to the following security vulnerabilities: Cross-site scripting - CVE-2016-1136 Open redirect - CVE-2016-1137 HTTP header injection - CVE-2016-1138 Cross-site request forgery - CVE-2016-1139 Click jacking - CVE-2016-1140 OS command injection - CVE-2016-1141 Attackers can exploit these issues to execute arbitrary script or HTML code, steal cookie-based authentication credentials, or conduct phishing attacks, or inject arbitrary HTTP headers, or execute arbitrary OS commands in context of the affected application,or allow attackers to gain unauthorized access to the affected application or obtain sensitive information, and to to perform certain unauthorized actions. Note- HOME SPOT CUBE2 is not affected by these vulnerabilities

Heap-based buffer overflow in MICROSYS PROMOTIC before 8.3.11 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via a malformed HTML document. MICROSYS PROMOTIC is a Windows-based monitoring and data acquisition human-machine interface software programming suite for industrial applications. MICROSYS PROMOTIC is prone to a local heap-based buffer-overflow vulnerability because the application fails to properly bounds-check user-supplied data before copying it into an insufficiently sized buffer. An attacker can exploit this issue to cause denial-of-service condition. Due to the nature of this issue, code-execution may be possible; however this has not been confirmed

Stack-based buffer overflow on Rockwell Automation Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 devices A through 15.000 and B before 15.002 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web request. Rockwell Automation Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 11001763-L16AWA is a programmable logic controller (PLC) product from Rockwell Corporation of the United States. Multiple MicroLogix 1100 PLC products are prone to a stack-based buffer-overflow vulnerability because it fails to perform adequate boundary-checks on user supplied data. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause denial-of-service conditions. Rockwell Automation Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 1763-L16AWA, etc. The following models and revisions are affected: Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 1763-L16AWA (Series B), 1763-L16BBB (Series B), 1763-L16BWA (Series B), 1763-L16DWD (Series B), 1763-L16AWA (Series A ), 1763-L16BBB (Series A), 1763-L16BWA (Series A), 1763-L16DWD (Series A) 15.000 and earlier

The file-download dialog in Mozilla Firefox before 44.0 on OS X enables a certain button too quickly, which allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site that triggers a single-click action in a situation where a double-click action was intended. Mozilla Firefox is prone to a security-bypass vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to bypass security restrictions and perform unauthorized actions; this may aid in launching further attacks. This issue is fixed in: Firefox 44. Mozilla Firefox is an open source web browser developed by the Mozilla Foundation in the United States. A security vulnerability exists in the file-download dialog in Mozilla Firefox prior to 44.0 on OS X. The vulnerability is caused by the short interval between the dialog gaining focus and the button being available. Remote attackers can use specially crafted Web sites to exploit this vulnerability to carry out clickjacking attacks. From: Yury German <blueknight@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-announce@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <916540f6-4310-774b-bd6f-8f60d477da02@gentoo.org> Subject: [ GLSA 201605-06 ] Mozilla Products: Multiple vulnerabilities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201605-06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - https://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: Normal Title: Mozilla Products: Multiple vulnerabilities Date: May 31, 2016 Bugs: #549356, #557590, #559186, #561246, #563230, #564834, #573074, #574596, #576862 ID: 201605-06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis ======== Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Firefox, Thunderbird, Network Security Services (NSS), and NetScape Portable Runtime (NSPR) with the worst of which may allow remote execution of arbitrary code. Background ========== Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, Mozilla Thunderbird an open-source email client, and the Network Security Service (NSS) is a library implementing security features like SSL v.2/v.3, TLS, PKCS #5, PKCS #7, PKCS #11, PKCS #12, S/MIME and X.509 certificates. The SeaMonkey project is a community effort to deliver production-quality releases of code derived from the application formerly known as 'Mozilla Application Suite'. Affected packages ================= ------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 dev-libs/nspr < 4.12 >= 4.12 2 dev-libs/nss < 3.22.2 >= 3.22.2 3 mail-client/thunderbird < 38.7.0 >= 38.7.0 4 mail-client/thunderbird-bin < 38.7.0 >= 38.7.0 5 www-client/firefox < 38.7.0 >= 38.7.0 6 www-client/firefox-bin < 38.7.0 >= 38.7.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 affected packages Description =========== Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Firefox, NSS, NSPR, and Thunderbird. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact ====== A remote attacker could entice a user to view a specially crafted web page or email, possibly resulting in execution of arbitrary code or a Denial of Service condition. Workaround ========== There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution ========== All NSS users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-libs/nss-3.22.2" All Thunderbird users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=mail-client/thunderbird-38.7.0"= All users of the Thunderbird binary package should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot -v ">=mail-client/thunderbird-bin-38.7.0" All Firefox 38.7.x users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-client/firefox-38.7.0" All users of the Firefox 38.7.x binary package should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-client/firefox-bin-38.7.0" References ========== [ 1 ] CVE-2015-2708 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2708 [ 2 ] CVE-2015-2708 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2708 [ 3 ] CVE-2015-2709 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2709 [ 4 ] CVE-2015-2709 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2709 [ 5 ] CVE-2015-2710 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2710 [ 6 ] CVE-2015-2710 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2710 [ 7 ] CVE-2015-2711 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2711 [ 8 ] CVE-2015-2711 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2711 [ 9 ] CVE-2015-2712 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2712 [ 10 ] CVE-2015-2712 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2712 [ 11 ] CVE-2015-2713 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2713 [ 12 ] CVE-2015-2713 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2713 [ 13 ] CVE-2015-2714 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2714 [ 14 ] CVE-2015-2714 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2714 [ 15 ] CVE-2015-2715 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2715 [ 16 ] CVE-2015-2715 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2715 [ 17 ] CVE-2015-2716 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2716 [ 18 ] CVE-2015-2716 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2716 [ 19 ] CVE-2015-2717 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2717 [ 20 ] CVE-2015-2717 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2717 [ 21 ] CVE-2015-2718 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2718 [ 22 ] CVE-2015-2718 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-2718 [ 23 ] CVE-2015-4473 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4473 [ 24 ] CVE-2015-4473 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4473 [ 25 ] CVE-2015-4474 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4474 [ 26 ] CVE-2015-4474 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4474 [ 27 ] CVE-2015-4475 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4475 [ 28 ] CVE-2015-4475 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4475 [ 29 ] CVE-2015-4477 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4477 [ 30 ] CVE-2015-4477 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4477 [ 31 ] CVE-2015-4478 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4478 [ 32 ] CVE-2015-4478 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4478 [ 33 ] CVE-2015-4479 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4479 [ 34 ] CVE-2015-4479 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4479 [ 35 ] CVE-2015-4480 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4480 [ 36 ] CVE-2015-4480 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4480 [ 37 ] CVE-2015-4481 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4481 [ 38 ] CVE-2015-4481 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4481 [ 39 ] CVE-2015-4482 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4482 [ 40 ] CVE-2015-4482 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4482 [ 41 ] CVE-2015-4483 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4483 [ 42 ] CVE-2015-4483 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4483 [ 43 ] CVE-2015-4484 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4484 [ 44 ] CVE-2015-4484 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4484 [ 45 ] CVE-2015-4485 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4485 [ 46 ] CVE-2015-4485 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4485 [ 47 ] CVE-2015-4486 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4486 [ 48 ] CVE-2015-4486 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4486 [ 49 ] CVE-2015-4487 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4487 [ 50 ] CVE-2015-4487 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4487 [ 51 ] CVE-2015-4488 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4488 [ 52 ] CVE-2015-4488 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4488 [ 53 ] CVE-2015-4489 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4489 [ 54 ] CVE-2015-4489 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4489 [ 55 ] CVE-2015-4490 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4490 [ 56 ] CVE-2015-4490 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4490 [ 57 ] CVE-2015-4491 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4491 [ 58 ] CVE-2015-4491 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4491 [ 59 ] CVE-2015-4492 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4492 [ 60 ] CVE-2015-4492 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4492 [ 61 ] CVE-2015-4493 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4493 [ 62 ] CVE-2015-4493 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-4493 [ 63 ] CVE-2015-7181 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-7181 [ 64 ] CVE-2015-7182 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-7182 [ 65 ] CVE-2015-7183 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-7183 [ 66 ] CVE-2016-1523 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1523 [ 67 ] CVE-2016-1523 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1523 [ 68 ] CVE-2016-1930 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1930 [ 69 ] CVE-2016-1930 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1930 [ 70 ] CVE-2016-1931 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1931 [ 71 ] CVE-2016-1931 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1931 [ 72 ] CVE-2016-1933 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1933 [ 73 ] CVE-2016-1933 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1933 [ 74 ] CVE-2016-1935 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1935 [ 75 ] CVE-2016-1935 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1935 [ 76 ] CVE-2016-1937 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1937 [ 77 ] CVE-2016-1937 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1937 [ 78 ] CVE-2016-1938 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1938 [ 79 ] CVE-2016-1938 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1938 [ 80 ] CVE-2016-1939 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1939 [ 81 ] CVE-2016-1939 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1939 [ 82 ] CVE-2016-1940 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1940 [ 83 ] CVE-2016-1940 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1940 [ 84 ] CVE-2016-1941 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1941 [ 85 ] CVE-2016-1941 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1941 [ 86 ] CVE-2016-1942 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1942 [ 87 ] CVE-2016-1942 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1942 [ 88 ] CVE-2016-1943 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1943 [ 89 ] CVE-2016-1943 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1943 [ 90 ] CVE-2016-1944 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1944 [ 91 ] CVE-2016-1944 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1944 [ 92 ] CVE-2016-1945 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1945 [ 93 ] CVE-2016-1945 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1945 [ 94 ] CVE-2016-1946 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1946 [ 95 ] CVE-2016-1946 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1946 [ 96 ] CVE-2016-1947 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1947 [ 97 ] CVE-2016-1947 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1947 [ 98 ] CVE-2016-1948 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1948 [ 99 ] CVE-2016-1948 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1948 [ 100 ] CVE-2016-1949 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1949 [ 101 ] CVE-2016-1949 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1949 [ 102 ] CVE-2016-1950 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1950 [ 103 ] CVE-2016-1950 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1950 [ 104 ] CVE-2016-1952 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1952 [ 105 ] CVE-2016-1952 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1952 [ 106 ] CVE-2016-1953 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1953 [ 107 ] CVE-2016-1953 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1953 [ 108 ] CVE-2016-1954 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1954 [ 109 ] CVE-2016-1954 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1954 [ 110 ] CVE-2016-1955 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1955 [ 111 ] CVE-2016-1955 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1955 [ 112 ] CVE-2016-1956 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1956 [ 113 ] CVE-2016-1956 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1956 [ 114 ] CVE-2016-1957 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1957 [ 115 ] CVE-2016-1957 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1957 [ 116 ] CVE-2016-1958 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1958 [ 117 ] CVE-2016-1958 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1958 [ 118 ] CVE-2016-1959 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1959 [ 119 ] CVE-2016-1959 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1959 [ 120 ] CVE-2016-1960 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1960 [ 121 ] CVE-2016-1960 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1960 [ 122 ] CVE-2016-1961 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1961 [ 123 ] CVE-2016-1961 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1961 [ 124 ] CVE-2016-1962 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1962 [ 125 ] CVE-2016-1962 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1962 [ 126 ] CVE-2016-1963 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1963 [ 127 ] CVE-2016-1963 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1963 [ 128 ] CVE-2016-1964 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1964 [ 129 ] CVE-2016-1964 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1964 [ 130 ] CVE-2016-1965 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1965 [ 131 ] CVE-2016-1965 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1965 [ 132 ] CVE-2016-1966 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1966 [ 133 ] CVE-2016-1966 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1966 [ 134 ] CVE-2016-1967 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1967 [ 135 ] CVE-2016-1967 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1967 [ 136 ] CVE-2016-1968 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1968 [ 137 ] CVE-2016-1968 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1968 [ 138 ] CVE-2016-1969 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1969 [ 139 ] CVE-2016-1969 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1969 [ 140 ] CVE-2016-1970 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1970 [ 141 ] CVE-2016-1970 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1970 [ 142 ] CVE-2016-1971 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1971 [ 143 ] CVE-2016-1971 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1971 [ 144 ] CVE-2016-1972 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1972 [ 145 ] CVE-2016-1972 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1972 [ 146 ] CVE-2016-1973 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1973 [ 147 ] CVE-2016-1973 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1973 [ 148 ] CVE-2016-1974 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1974 [ 149 ] CVE-2016-1974 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1974 [ 150 ] CVE-2016-1975 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1975 [ 151 ] CVE-2016-1975 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1975 [ 152 ] CVE-2016-1976 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1976 [ 153 ] CVE-2016-1976 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1976 [ 154 ] CVE-2016-1977 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1977 [ 155 ] CVE-2016-1977 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1977 [ 156 ] CVE-2016-1978 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1978 [ 157 ] CVE-2016-1978 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1978 [ 158 ] CVE-2016-1979 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1979 [ 159 ] CVE-2016-1979 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-1979 [ 160 ] CVE-2016-2790 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2790 [ 161 ] CVE-2016-2790 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2790 [ 162 ] CVE-2016-2791 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2791 [ 163 ] CVE-2016-2791 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2791 [ 164 ] CVE-2016-2792 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2792 [ 165 ] CVE-2016-2792 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2792 [ 166 ] CVE-2016-2793 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2793 [ 167 ] CVE-2016-2793 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2793 [ 168 ] CVE-2016-2794 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2794 [ 169 ] CVE-2016-2794 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2794 [ 170 ] CVE-2016-2795 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2795 [ 171 ] CVE-2016-2795 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2795 [ 172 ] CVE-2016-2796 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2796 [ 173 ] CVE-2016-2796 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2796 [ 174 ] CVE-2016-2797 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2797 [ 175 ] CVE-2016-2797 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2797 [ 176 ] CVE-2016-2798 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2798 [ 177 ] CVE-2016-2798 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2798 [ 178 ] CVE-2016-2799 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2799 [ 179 ] CVE-2016-2799 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2799 [ 180 ] CVE-2016-2800 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2800 [ 181 ] CVE-2016-2800 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2800 [ 182 ] CVE-2016-2801 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2801 [ 183 ] CVE-2016-2801 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2801 [ 184 ] CVE-2016-2802 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2802 [ 185 ] CVE-2016-2802 http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2016-2802 Availability ============ This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201605-06 Concerns? ========= Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org. License ======= Copyright 2016 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 --Bs4bwglUWSbluQjJQQ051Q7fVoU1XxLw6

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to permalinks, aka Bug ID CSCux92033. An attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This can allow the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCux92033. This component integrates agent application and self-service voice service, and provides functions such as call distribution and customer access control. The following releases are affected: Cisco Unified CCX Release 10.0(1), Release 10.5(1), Release 10.6(1), Release 11.0(1)

Race condition in the initialization process on Lexmark printers with firmware ATL before ATL.02.049, CB before CB.02.049, PP before PP.02.049, and YK before YK.02.049 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging incorrect detection of the security-jumper status. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-254: Security Features ( Security function ) Has been identified. http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/254.htmlAuthentication may be circumvented by a third party using unauthorized detection of the security jumper status. Lexmarkprinter is a printer product from Lexmark. A remote attacker bypasses authentication by incorrect detection of the security-jumper state. Lexmark Laser Printers are prone to a local authentication-bypass vulnerability. A local attacker can exploit this issue to bypass the authentication mechanism and perform unauthorized actions. This may lead to further attacks. The following versions are affected: Lexmark printers using ATL versions prior to ATL.02.049, CB versions prior to CB.02.049, PP versions prior to PP.02.049, and YK versions prior to YK.02.049