VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

The administrative web interface in Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) before 3.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via crafted field values, aka Bug ID CSCuy96280. Cisco Prime Infrastructure is prone to an HTML-injection vulnerability because it fails to sanitize user-supplied input. Successful exploits will allow attacker-supplied HTML and script code to run in the context of the affected site, potentially allowing the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials or control how the site is rendered to the user. Other attacks are also possible. The issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuy96280. Cisco Prime Infrastructure versions 3.1.0 and prior are affected. The vulnerability is caused by the program not properly validating user input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system

The virtual network stack on Cisco AMP Threat Grid Appliance devices before 2.1.1 allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism, and consequently obtain sensitive interprocess information or modify interprocess data, via a crafted malware sample. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-254: Security Features ( Security function ) Has been identified. Cisco AMP Threat Grid Appliance is prone to an unauthorized-access vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to gain unauthorized access to the affected application. This may aid in further attacks. Cisco AMP Threat Grid Appliance running software versions prior to 2.1.1 are vulnerable. The solution can help enterprises analyze the behavior and intent of malware, the impact of threats, and defense methods

The Mobile and Remote Access (MRA) component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) X8.1 through X8.7 and Expressway X8.1 through X8.6 mishandles certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an arbitrary trusted certificate, aka Bug ID CSCuz64601. Vendors have confirmed this vulnerability Bug ID CSCuz64601 It is released as.A third party could bypass authentication through any trusted certificate. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to bypass identity and access internal HTTP system resources. An attacker can exploit this issue to perform man-in-the-middle attacks and perform certain unauthorized actions, which will aid in further attacks. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuz64601. The vulnerability is caused by the program not correctly verifying trusted certificates

Juniper Junos OS before 12.1X46-D45, 12.1X46-D50, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D35, 12.3X48 before 12.3X48-D30, 13.3 before 13.3R9-S1, 14.1 before 14.1R7, 14.2 before 14.2R6, 15.1 before 15.1F2-S5, 15.1F4 before 15.1F4-S2, 15.1R before 15.1R2-S3, 15.1 before 15.1R3, and 15.1X49 before 15.1X49-D40 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (kernel crash) via a crafted UDP packet destined to the interface IP address of a 64-bit OS device. Juniper Junos is prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this issue to crash the kernel causing a denial-of-service condition. Juniper Junos OS is a set of network operating system of Juniper Networks (Juniper Networks) dedicated to the company's hardware systems. The operating system provides a secure programming interface and Junos SDK. The following versions are affected: Juniper Junos OS prior to 12.1X46-D45, 12.1X46-D50, 12.1X47 prior to 12.1X47-D35, 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D30, 13.3 prior to 13.3R9-S1 , 14.1 version before 14.1R7, 14.2 version before 14.2R6, 15.1 version before 15.1F2-S5, 15.1F4 version before 15.1F4-S2, 15.1R version before 15.1R2-S3, 15.1 version before 15.1R3 , 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D40

The MediaTek Wi-Fi driver in Android before 2016-07-05 on Android One devices allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted application, aka Android internal bug 28175522 and MediaTek internal bug ALPS02694389. Google Android One is prone to an information-disclosure vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to obtain sensitive information that may aid in launching further attacks. This issue is being tracked by Android Bug ID 28175522

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol-WebVIS 3.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol is a web-based HMI (Human Machine Interface) system from Rexroth Bosch, Germany. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials, compromise the application, access or modify data, or exploit latent vulnerabilities in the underlying database

SQL injection vulnerability in Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol-WebVIS 3.0.2 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol is a web-based HMI system. Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol-WebVIS is prone to SQL-injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials, compromise the application, access or modify data, or exploit latent vulnerabilities in the underlying database. Rexroth Bosch BLADEcontrol-WebVIS version 3.0.2 and earlier are vulnerable

The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c. OpenSSL is prone to denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this issue to cause a denial-of-service condition. Versions prior to OpenSSL 1.1.0 are vulnerable. OpenSSL Security Advisory [22 Sep 2016] ======================================== OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth (CVE-2016-6304) ===================================================================== Severity: High A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation, sending a large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will be unbounded memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a Denial Of Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a default configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP. Builds using the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected. Servers using OpenSSL versions prior to 1.0.1g are not vulnerable in a default configuration, instead only if an application explicitly enables OCSP stapling support. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 29th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SSL_peek() hang on empty record (CVE-2016-6305) =============================================== Severity: Moderate OpenSSL 1.1.0 SSL/TLS will hang during a call to SSL_peek() if the peer sends an empty record. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial Of Service attack. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 10th September 2016 by Alex Gaynor. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SWEET32 Mitigation (CVE-2016-2183) ================================== Severity: Low SWEET32 (https://sweet32.info) is an attack on older block cipher algorithms that use a block size of 64 bits. In mitigation for the SWEET32 attack DES based ciphersuites have been moved from the HIGH cipherstring group to MEDIUM in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and OpenSSL 1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.1.0 since release has had these ciphersuites disabled by default. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 16th August 2016 by Karthikeyan Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent (INRIA). The fix was developed by Rich Salz of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in MDC2_Update() (CVE-2016-6303) ========================================== Severity: Low An overflow can occur in MDC2_Update() either if called directly or through the EVP_DigestUpdate() function using MDC2. If an attacker is able to supply very large amounts of input data after a previous call to EVP_EncryptUpdate() with a partial block then a length check can overflow resulting in a heap corruption. The amount of data needed is comparable to SIZE_MAX which is impractical on most platforms. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 11th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302) =========================================== Severity: Low If a server uses SHA512 for TLS session ticket HMAC it is vulnerable to a DoS attack where a malformed ticket will result in an OOB read which will ultimately crash. The use of SHA512 in TLS session tickets is comparatively rare as it requires a custom server callback and ticket lookup mechanism. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 19th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in BN_bn2dec() (CVE-2016-2182) ======================================== Severity: Low The function BN_bn2dec() does not check the return value of BN_div_word(). This can cause an OOB write if an application uses this function with an overly large BIGNUM. This could be a problem if an overly large certificate or CRL is printed out from an untrusted source. TLS is not affected because record limits will reject an oversized certificate before it is parsed. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 2nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB read in TS_OBJ_print_bio() (CVE-2016-2180) ============================================== Severity: Low The function TS_OBJ_print_bio() misuses OBJ_obj2txt(): the return value is the total length the OID text representation would use and not the amount of data written. This will result in OOB reads when large OIDs are presented. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st July 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Pointer arithmetic undefined behaviour (CVE-2016-2177) ====================================================== Severity: Low Avoid some undefined pointer arithmetic A common idiom in the codebase is to check limits in the following manner: "p + len > limit" Where "p" points to some malloc'd data of SIZE bytes and limit == p + SIZE "len" here could be from some externally supplied data (e.g. from a TLS message). The rules of C pointer arithmetic are such that "p + len" is only well defined where len <= SIZE. Therefore the above idiom is actually undefined behaviour. For example this could cause problems if some malloc implementation provides an address for "p" such that "p + len" actually overflows for values of len that are too big and therefore p + len < limit. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 4th May 2016 by Guido Vranken. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Constant time flag not preserved in DSA signing (CVE-2016-2178) =============================================================== Severity: Low Operations in the DSA signing algorithm should run in constant time in order to avoid side channel attacks. A flaw in the OpenSSL DSA implementation means that a non-constant time codepath is followed for certain operations. This has been demonstrated through a cache-timing attack to be sufficient for an attacker to recover the private DSA key. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 23rd May 2016 by César Pereida (Aalto University), Billy Brumley (Tampere University of Technology), and Yuval Yarom (The University of Adelaide and NICTA). The fix was developed by César Pereida. DTLS buffered message DoS (CVE-2016-2179) ========================================= Severity: Low In a DTLS connection where handshake messages are delivered out-of-order those messages that OpenSSL is not yet ready to process will be buffered for later use. Under certain circumstances, a flaw in the logic means that those messages do not get removed from the buffer even though the handshake has been completed. An attacker could force up to approx. 15 messages to remain in the buffer when they are no longer required. These messages will be cleared when the DTLS connection is closed. The default maximum size for a message is 100k. Therefore the attacker could force an additional 1500k to be consumed per connection. By opening many simulataneous connections an attacker could cause a DoS attack through memory exhaustion. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd June 2016 by Quan Luo. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. DTLS replay protection DoS (CVE-2016-2181) ========================================== Severity: Low A flaw in the DTLS replay attack protection mechanism means that records that arrive for future epochs update the replay protection "window" before the MAC for the record has been validated. This could be exploited by an attacker by sending a record for the next epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very large sequence number. This means that all subsequent legitimate packets are dropped causing a denial of service for a specific DTLS connection. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st November 2015 by the OCAP audit team. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Certificate message OOB reads (CVE-2016-6306) ============================================= Severity: Low In OpenSSL 1.0.2 and earlier some missing message length checks can result in OOB reads of up to 2 bytes beyond an allocated buffer. There is a theoretical DoS risk but this has not been observed in practice on common platforms. The messages affected are client certificate, client certificate request and server certificate. As a result the attack can only be performed against a client or a server which enables client authentication. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header() (CVE-2016-6307) ========================================================================== Severity: Low A TLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect DTLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 TLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in dtls1_preprocess_fragment() (CVE-2016-6308) ============================================================================= Severity: Low This issue is very similar to CVE-2016-6307. The underlying defect is different but the security analysis and impacts are the same except that it impacts DTLS. A DTLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect TLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Note ==== As per our previous announcements and our Release Strategy (https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html), support for OpenSSL version 1.0.1 will cease on 31st December 2016. No security updates for that version will be provided after that date. Users of 1.0.1 are advised to upgrade. Support for versions 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 ended on 31st December 2015. Those versions are no longer receiving security updates. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time. For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see: https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Important: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2016:1940-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.html Issue date: 2016-09-27 CVE Names: CVE-2016-2177 CVE-2016-2178 CVE-2016-2179 CVE-2016-2180 CVE-2016-2181 CVE-2016-2182 CVE-2016-6302 CVE-2016-6304 CVE-2016-6306 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: An update for openssl is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7) - ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7) - ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library. A remote attacker could cause a TLS server using OpenSSL to consume an excessive amount of memory and, possibly, exit unexpectedly after exhausting all available memory, if it enabled OCSP stapling support. (CVE-2016-2178) * It was discovered that the Datagram TLS (DTLS) implementation could fail to release memory in certain cases. A malicious DTLS client could cause a DTLS server using OpenSSL to consume an excessive amount of memory and, possibly, exit unexpectedly after exhausting all available memory. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to make a DTLS server using OpenSSL to reject further packets sent from a DTLS client over an established DTLS connection. (CVE-2016-2181) * An out of bounds write flaw was discovered in the OpenSSL BN_bn2dec() function. (CVE-2016-2182) * A flaw was found in the DES/3DES cipher was used as part of the TLS/SSL protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to recover some plaintext data by capturing large amounts of encrypted traffic between TLS/SSL server and client if the communication used a DES/3DES based ciphersuite. (CVE-2016-2183) This update mitigates the CVE-2016-2183 issue by lowering priority of DES cipher suites so they are not preferred over cipher suites using AES. For compatibility reasons, DES cipher suites remain enabled by default and included in the set of cipher suites identified by the HIGH cipher string. Future updates may move them to MEDIUM or not enable them by default. * An integer underflow flaw leading to a buffer over-read was found in the way OpenSSL parsed TLS session tickets. (CVE-2016-6302) * Multiple integer overflow flaws were found in the way OpenSSL performed pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to cause a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL to crash. (CVE-2016-2177) * An out of bounds read flaw was found in the way OpenSSL formatted Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol data for printing. An attacker could possibly cause an application using OpenSSL to crash if it printed time stamp data from the attacker. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to crash a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL. (CVE-2016-6306) Red Hat would like to thank the OpenSSL project for reporting CVE-2016-6304 and CVE-2016-6306 and OpenVPN for reporting CVE-2016-2183. 4. Solution: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 1341705 - CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase 1343400 - CVE-2016-2178 openssl: Non-constant time codepath followed for certain operations in DSA implementation 1359615 - CVE-2016-2180 OpenSSL: OOB read in TS_OBJ_print_bio() 1367340 - CVE-2016-2182 openssl: Out-of-bounds write caused by unchecked errors in BN_bn2dec() 1369113 - CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection 1369383 - CVE-2016-2183 SSL/TLS: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers (SWEET32) 1369504 - CVE-2016-2179 openssl: DTLS memory exhaustion DoS when messages are not removed from fragment buffer 1369855 - CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks 1377594 - CVE-2016-6306 openssl: certificate message OOB reads 1377600 - CVE-2016-6304 openssl: OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7): ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/ 7. References: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2177 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2178 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2179 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2180 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2181 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2182 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6302 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6304 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6306 https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2016 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFX6nnFXlSAg2UNWIIRAqklAJ9uGMit/wxZ0CfuGjR7Vi2+AjmGMwCfTpEI xpTW7ApBLmKhVjs49DGYouI= =4VgY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Additional information can be found at https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/06/27/undefined-pointer-arithmetic/ CVE-2016-2178 Cesar Pereida, Billy Brumley and Yuval Yarom discovered a timing leak in the DSA code. CVE-2016-2179 / CVE-2016-2181 Quan Luo and the OCAP audit team discovered denial of service vulnerabilities in DTLS. For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.1t-1+deb8u4. For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon. ========================================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-3087-2 September 23, 2016 openssl regression ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update fixes the problem. We apologize for the inconvenience. This issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update. (CVE-2016-2178) Quan Luo discovered that OpenSSL did not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries in the DTLS implementation. (CVE-2016-2181) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated division results. (CVE-2016-2182) Karthik Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent discovered that the DES and Triple DES ciphers were vulnerable to birthday attacks. (CVE-2016-2183) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain ticket lengths. (CVE-2016-6303) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly performed certain message length checks. (CVE-2016-6306) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.38 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes

The Fixon K2 wireless router is a wireless router for home use. The Feixun K2 wireless router has an unauthorized read configuration file vulnerability. Because Fixon K2 can unauthorizedly read the configuration file (including the password for logging in to the device) without logging in, thereby illegally logging into the wireless router and reading the configuration file information.

A Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in versions of F5 WebSafe Dashboard 3.9.x and earlier, aka F5 WebSafe Alert Server, allows an unauthenticated user to inject HTML via a crafted alert. An attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This may allow the attacker to steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. Versions prior to WebSafe Alert Server 3.9.x are vulnerable. F5 WebSafe is a set of network fraud protection solutions from F5 Corporation of the United States. The solution provides malware and fraud detection, client mobile threat protection, and more. F5 WebSafe Dashboard is one of the dashboard components. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject arbitrary web scripts or HTML

Stack-based buffer overflow in ELCSimulator in Eaton ELCSoft 2.4.01 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long packet. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the processing of network TCP requests by ELCSimulator.exe. A crafted request will cause a stack buffer overflow. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the process. Eaton ELCSoft Programming Software is a set of software for configuring a programmable logic controller. Eaton ELCSoft Programming Software is prone to multiple buffer-overflow vulnerabilities because it fails to adequately bounds-check user-supplied data before copying it to an insufficiently sized memory buffer. Failed exploits will result in denial-of-service condition. Eaton ELCSoft 2.4.01 and prior versions are vulnerable

Heap-based buffer overflow in elcsoft.exe in Eaton ELCSoft 2.4.01 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within processing of EPC files. Parsing a specially crafted EPC file can cause ELCSoft.exe to overwrite a TList object in memory. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the process. Eaton ELCSoft Programming Software is a set of software for configuring programmable logic controllers by Eaton, USA. A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Eaton ELCSoft Programming Software 2.4.01 and earlier. Eaton ELCSoft Programming Software is prone to multiple buffer-overflow vulnerabilities because it fails to adequately bounds-check user-supplied data before copying it to an insufficiently sized memory buffer. Failed exploits will result in denial-of-service condition. Eaton ELCSoft 2.4.01 and prior versions are vulnerable

Stack-based buffer overflow in WECON LeviStudio allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file. WECON LeviStudio is the HMI programming software. WECON LeviStudio is prone to multiple buffer-overflow vulnerabilities because the application fails to handle exceptions properly. Failed exploit attempts will likely result in denial-of-service conditions

Siemens SICAM PAS before 8.07 does not properly restrict password data in the database, which makes it easier for local users to calculate passwords by leveraging unspecified database privileges. SICAM PAS is an energy automation solution for substation equipment operation. It has an open communication interface to meet the control requirements of power system control and industrial power supply equipment. An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Siemens SICAM PAS. By authentication, an attacker with the SICAM PAS database privilege can recreate the SICAM PAS user password. Siemens SICAM PAS is prone to multiple local information-disclosure vulnerabilities Local attackers can exploit these issues to obtain sensitive information that may aid in further attacks

Siemens SICAM PAS through 8.07 allows local users to obtain sensitive configuration information by leveraging database stoppage. SICAM PAS is an energy automation solution for substation equipment operation. It has an open communication interface to meet the control requirements of power system control and industrial power supply equipment. An information disclosure vulnerability exists in Siemens SICAM PAS

BIOS (BasicInput/OutputSystem) is the basic output input system, which is the most basic software code loaded on the computer hardware system. There is a security vulnerability in LenovoThinkPadBIOS. In the system management mode, an attacker with local administrative access can use the vulnerability to execute arbitrary code, disable flash write protection, infect platform firmware, disable secure boot, bypass virtual security mode, and so on. Lenovo ThinkPad is prone to a local privilege escalation vulnerability

Huawei Mate8 NXT-AL before NXT-AL10C00B182, NXT-CL before NXT-CL00C92B182, NXT-DL before NXT-DL00C17B182, and NXT-TL before NXT-TL00C01B182 allows attackers to bypass permission checks and control partial module functions via a crafted app. HuaweiMate8 is a smartphone product from Huawei in China. A security bypass vulnerability exists in HuaweiMate8. Huawei Smart Phones are prone to a local security-bypass vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to bypass certain security restrictions to perform unauthorized actions. This may aid in further attacks. There is a security flaw in the Huawei Mate 8. The following versions are affected: Huawei Mate 8 before NXT-AL10C00B182, before NXT-CL00C92B182, before NXT-DL00C17B182, before NXT-TL00C01B182

Huawei Mate8 NXT-AL before NXT-AL10C00B182, NXT-CL before NXT-CL00C92B182, NXT-DL before NXT-DL00C17B182, and NXT-TL before NXT-TL00C01B182 allows attackers to bypass permission checks and delete user data via a crafted app. HuaweiMate8 is a smartphone product from Huawei in China. There is a security bypass data deletion vulnerability in HuaweiMate8. Huawei Mate8 is prone to a local security-bypass vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to bypass certain security restrictions to perform unauthorized actions. This may aid in further attacks. There is a security flaw in the Huawei Mate 8. The following versions are affected: Huawei Mate 8 before NXT-AL10C00B182, before NXT-CL00C92B182, before NXT-DL00C17B182, before NXT-TL00C01B182

Netgear is the world's leading enterprise network solution and advocate for digital home networking applications. There are web interface login password leaks in Netgear's various devices. When password recovery is disabled, an attacker who can access the internal network or remotely manage the router interface can exploit the vulnerability to obtain the management interface login password.

1. An attacker exploits a vulnerability to entice a user to visit a malicious link or download a malicious file. AirLinkRavenXT and XE are SierraWireless's M2M gateways that provide remote monitoring and industrial application control. There is a sniffing credential vulnerability in AirLinkRavenXT and XE. An attacker exploits a vulnerability to sniff a voucher and log into the system. Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE and XT are wireless gateway products from Canada's Sierra Wireless. Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE and XT Gateway exist 1. Arbitrary file upload vulnerability 2. Cross-site request forgery vulnerability 3. Information disclosure vulnerability. A remote attacker can use these vulnerabilities to upload arbitrary files, perform unauthorized operations, and obtain permissions and sensitive information about the affected device. A cross-site request-forgery and 3