VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

The RESOLV::lookup iRule command in F5 BIG-IP LTM, APM, ASM, and Link Controller 10.2.1 through 10.2.4, 11.2.1, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.0.0 before HF3; BIG-IP AAM, AFM, and PEM 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.0.0 before HF3; BIG-IP Analytics 11.2.1, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.0.0 before HF3; BIG-IP DNS 12.0.0 before HF3; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 10.2.1 through 10.2.4 and 11.2.1; BIG-IP GTM 10.2.1 through 10.2.4, 11.2.1, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1; and BIG-IP PSM 10.2.1 through 10.2.4 and 11.4.0 through 11.4.1 allows remote DNS servers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption or Traffic Management Microkernel crash) via a crafted PTR response. Multiple F5 BIG-IP Products are prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this issue to cause a denial-of-service condition. F5 BIG-IP Analytics and others are products of F5 Corporation of the United States. F5 BIG-IP Analytics is a suite of web application performance analysis software. APM is a set of solutions that provide secure and unified access to business-critical applications and networks. LTM is a local traffic manager. The following products and versions are affected: F5 BIG-IP LTM, APM, ASM, Link Controller Versions 10.2.1 to 10.2.4, Versions 11.2.1, Versions 11.4.x, Versions 11.5.x prior to 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6 11.6.x prior to .1, 12.0.0 prior to HF3, BIG-IP AAM, AFM, PEM 11.4.x prior to 11.5.4 11.5.x prior to HF2, 11.6.x prior to 11.6.1 , 12.0.0 prior to HF3, BIG-IP Analytics 11.2.1, 11.4.x, 11.5.4 11.5.x prior to HF2, 11.6.x prior to 11.6.1, 12.0.0 prior to HF3 version, BIG-IP DNS HF3 prior to 12.0.0, BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, WOM 10.2.1 to 10.2.4, 11.2.1, BIG-IP GTM 10.2.1 to 10.2.4, 11.2.1 releases, 11.4.x releases, 11.5.x releases prior to 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x releases prior to 11.6.1, BIG-IP PSM 10.2.1 to 10.2.4 releases, 11.4.0 to 11.4. 1 version

The TLS implementation in HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (aka iLO3) firmware before 1.88 does not properly use a MAC protection mechanism in conjunction with CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a padding-oracle attack, aka a Vaudenay attack. This vulnerability "Vaudenay attack " It is called.A third party may obtain important information through a padding oracle attack. HP Integrated Lights-Out is prone to an information-disclosure vulnerability. Versions prior to HP Integrated Lights-Out 3 1.88 are vulnerable. HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (iLO3) is an embedded server management technology of Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), which uses an integrated remote management port to monitor and maintain the health of the server and remotely manage the server wait. The source program of the vulnerability does not use the MAC protection mechanism correctly. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Note: the current version of the following document is available here: https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c05249760 SUPPORT COMMUNICATION - SECURITY BULLETIN Document ID: c05249760 Version: 1 HPSBHF03641 rev.1 - HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (iLO 3), Remote Disclosure of Information NOTICE: The information in this Security Bulletin should be acted upon as soon as possible. Release Date: 2016-08-30 Last Updated: 2016-08-30 Potential Security Impact: Remote Disclosure of Information Source: Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Product Security Response Team VULNERABILITY SUMMARY A potential security vulnerability has been identified with certain versions of HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (iLO 3). References: - CVE-2016-4379 - PSRT102936 SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS*: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HPE Integrated Lights-Out 3 (iLO 3) all firmware versions prior to 1.88 BACKGROUND CVSS Base Metrics ================= Reference, CVSS V3 Score/Vector, CVSS V2 Score/Vector CVE-2016-4379 5.3 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N 2.6 (AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N) Information on CVSS is documented in HPE Customer Notice HPSN-2008-002 here: https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c01345499 Hewlett Packard Enterprise thanks Hanno Boeck for reporting this vulnerability to security-alert@hpe.com. RESOLUTION HPE has made the following firmware updates available to resolve the vulnerability in iLO 3. iLO3 firmware version 1.88 is available from the following locations: + Online ROM Flash Component for Windows x86 <https://www.hpe.com/global/swpublishing/MTX-3ef65d13406a41de97e6a75a3c> + Online ROM Flash Component for Windows x64 <https://www.hpe.com/global/swpublishing/MTX-bb45e0682dd04f098ad89e189c> + Online ROM Flash Component for Linux <https://www.hpe.com/global/swpublishing/MTX-4882dccaaa0d4fbcbd353033e6> + Online ROM Flash Component for VMware ESXi <https://www.hpe.com/global/swpublishing/MTX-04b05621285145119cbaa69982> HISTORY Version:1 (rev.1) - 30 August 2016 Initial release Third Party Security Patches: Third party security patches that are to be installed on systems running Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) software products should be applied in accordance with the customer's patch management policy. Support: For issues about implementing the recommendations of this Security Bulletin, contact normal HPE Services support channel. For other issues about the content of this Security Bulletin, send e-mail to security-alert@hpe.com. Report: To report a potential security vulnerability for any HPE supported product: Web form: https://www.hpe.com/info/report-security-vulnerability Email: security-alert@hpe.com Subscribe: To initiate a subscription to receive future HPE Security Bulletin alerts via Email: http://www.hpe.com/support/Subscriber_Choice Security Bulletin Archive: A list of recently released Security Bulletins is available here: http://www.hpe.com/support/Security_Bulletin_Archive Software Product Category: The Software Product Category is represented in the title by the two characters following HPSB. 3C = 3COM 3P = 3rd Party Software GN = HPE General Software HF = HPE Hardware and Firmware MU = Multi-Platform Software NS = NonStop Servers OV = OpenVMS PV = ProCurve ST = Storage Software UX = HP-UX Copyright 2016 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Hewlett Packard Enterprise shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. The information provided is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. To the extent permitted by law, neither HP or its affiliates, subcontractors or suppliers will be liable for incidental,special or consequential damages including downtime cost; lost profits; damages relating to the procurement of substitute products or services; or damages for loss of data, or software restoration. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the names of Hewlett Packard Enterprise products referenced herein are trademarks of Hewlett Packard Enterprise in the United States and other countries. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective owners. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXxdRmAAoJEGIGBBYqRO9/wScH/jNuTs7zS27dp4ElK5vjie7y /kb0J5c58SJhihEzeTvV/JiydKtoyEf1HAW9AzRD/qYgWRN7gUaj2TN4syp8HyEx Ee0wvXvw3y8tZIWNOZIz5LNoTgf0hEPKRABFfMn5iI84OdtSPxgCXTkF1qm/fAHw S1wmyYv55qzQMR2gdxqLTpUjAQI/dU9X1kKAp46Ws6ZfnglLY88DAm6gfHLABTLi 7xt39WFgJ0mTn0VIKwhA3O78Q0MZlszNfcYX5p/6kfpngPcgrkNSsOxuvENtJKp6 RPZnas7rCVRdxfxrZjDYWWYmmYiPvfwkz8mTuapVWumjtvccNzwkFuIvDgjRvdo= =1ETs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

F5 BIG-IP LTM, Analytics, APM, ASM, and Link Controller 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP AAM, AFM, and PEM 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1, and 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP DNS 12.x before 12.0.0 HF3; BIG-IP Edge Gateway, WebAccelerator, and WOM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16 and 11.3.0; BIG-IP GTM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.x, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.1 HF1; BIG-IP PSM 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, and 11.4.0 through 11.4.1; Enterprise Manager 3.1.1; BIG-IQ Cloud and Security 4.0.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Device 4.2.0 through 4.5.0; BIG-IQ ADC 4.5.0; BIG-IQ Centralized Management 5.0.0; BIG-IQ Cloud and Orchestration 1.0.0; and iWorkflow 2.0.0, when Packet Filtering is enabled on virtual servers and possibly self IP addresses, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Traffic Management Microkernel restart) and possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted network traffic. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-284: Improper Access Control ( Inappropriate access control ) Has been identified. http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/284.htmlDenial of service operations through crafted network traffic by a third party (Traffic Management Microkernel Restart ) There is a possibility of being affected unspecified, such as being in a state. Multiple F5 BIG-IP Products are prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this issue to cause a denial-of-service condition. F5 BIG-IP Analytics and others are products of F5 Corporation of the United States. F5 BIG-IP Analytics is a suite of web application performance analysis software. APM is a set of solutions that provide secure and unified access to business-critical applications and networks. LTM is a local traffic manager

BHU Wi-Fi Router is a wireless router from China BHU. A security vulnerability exists in the BHU Wi-Fi Router. An attacker could use this vulnerability to perform unauthorized operations, obtain sensitive information, and execute arbitrary code in the context of an application

The BIOS for Lenovo ThinkCentre E93, M6500t/s, M6600, M6600q, M6600t/s, M73p, M800, M83, M8500t/s, M8600t/s, M900, M93, and M93P devices; ThinkServer RQ940, RS140, TS140, TS240, TS440, and TS540 devices; and ThinkStation E32, P300, and P310 devices might allow local users or physically proximate attackers to bypass the Secure Boot protection mechanism by leveraging an AMI test key. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-254: Security Features ( Security function ) Has been identified. Lenovo Secure Boot is prone to a local security-bypass vulnerability. Local attackers can exploit this issue to bypass certain security restrictions and perform unauthorized actions. Lenovo ThinkCentre E93, etc. are all computer products of China Lenovo (Lenovo). There are security vulnerabilities in the BIOS of several Lenovo products. The following products are affected: Lenovo ThinkCentre E93, M6500t/s, M6600, M6600q, M6600t/s, M73p, M800, M83, M8500t/s, M8600t/s, M900, M93, M93P, ThinkServer RQ940, RS140, TS140, TS240, TS440, TS540, ThinkStation E32, P300, P310

The (1) Device Manager, (2) Tiered Storage Manager, (3) Replication Manager, (4) Replication Monitor, and (5) Hitachi Automation Director (HAD) components in HPE XP P9000 Command View Advanced Edition Software before 8.4.1-00 and XP7 Command View Advanced Edition Suite before 8.4.1-00 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. Multiple HP Products are prone to a remote information-disclosure vulnerability. Remote attackers can exploit this issue to obtain sensitive information that may lead to further attacks

The kernel in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code in a privileged context or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted app. ( Memory corruption ) It may be in a state. Apple iOS is prone to a memory-corruption vulnerability. Failed exploit attempts may result in a denial-of-service condition. Versions prior to Apple iOS 9.3.5 are vulnerable. Kernel is one of the kernel components. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 APPLE-SA-2016-08-25-1 iOS 9.3.5 iOS 9.3.5 is now available and addresses the following: Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to disclose kernel memory Description: A validation issue was addressed through improved input sanitization. CVE-2016-4655: Citizen Lab and Lookout Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4656: Citizen Lab and Lookout WebKit Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: Visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4657: Citizen Lab and Lookout Installation note: This update is available through iTunes and Software Update on your iOS device, and will not appear in your computer's Software Update application, or in the Apple Downloads site. Make sure you have an Internet connection and have installed the latest version of iTunes from www.apple.com/itunes/ iTunes and Software Update on the device will automatically check Apple's update server on its weekly schedule. When an update is detected, it is downloaded and the option to be installed is presented to the user when the iOS device is docked. We recommend applying the update immediately if possible. Selecting Don't Install will present the option the next time you connect your iOS device. The automatic update process may take up to a week depending on the day that iTunes or the device checks for updates. You may manually obtain the update via the Check for Updates button within iTunes, or the Software Update on your device. To check that the iPhone, iPod touch, or iPad has been updated: * Navigate to Settings * Select General * Select About. The version after applying this update will be "9.3.5". Information will also be posted to the Apple Security Updates web site: https://support.apple.com/kb/HT201222 This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and details are available at: https://www.apple.com/support/security/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXvzhMAAoJEIOj74w0bLRGBAMP/RvcCKskvhLhBTixjPNBWWqE VFuQCMGif3Q9/2vLv9tQxeesXdG30Rn7LkCSStR0ZhSPrNFlSDlhHj/KOLFd5en+ lgctmToXnLQl+FzTnN0Tn872R3VENBl78OiP6K1urDJHMs1OwGgORyyKQgcaGcDZ GCBK7PUaK/yKVXfm1SJsMcyNL3lRGd05OnCPaXJruMZlbTWidK7R649oodPIIX+H cokqXBjM94M/Y6BUbPAeEh4lSk6ukygYHeb+JuTTj0AQ+82qIkWctkZLIVHZDLak aaTxLFpH9T9BAOTKSnpwFZa0Nj912OSkFbIbCMNyCcX/l7z2Pd+EVg/7rEEZBW+I yyo67JsXWQtCP9/P5El3V1lepNfuGOpRM5S+B/X2X+774QV/Xx8blVXTeDdDAk++ bHblfQKx2Xlkrznl+SFLnDfY5d8TlRmLEcQu1N7DiN22I1Qi9eXdzicBrCHyY3s0 sFTj577aBQ2gyH6EWTg4VfZHKKXtzPTNuSpAwobK8HKacezUhCXQ0BScmS47UMHu uk/sdirJX1GAfD0P7bcOsnTdMHG+vkXIFTuV+JsGcpg136kdg7rejVIsj/AKRChz f+e/7YsJIpMQriDr4w07huosClXKqSw64ygPyP0KYHTjO1picPocw1SF7eqyeng0 C6oESP46AbWYUbdihpm7 =PDst -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

WebKit in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via a crafted web site. Apple iOS used in etc. WebKit is prone to an unspecified memory-corruption vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code within the context of the user running the affected application. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause denial-of-service conditions. WebKit is a set of open source web browser engines jointly developed by companies such as KDE, Apple (Apple), and Google (Google), and is currently used by browsers such as Apple Safari and Google Chrome. A security vulnerability exists in WebKit in versions prior to Apple iOS 9.3.5. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 APPLE-SA-2016-08-25-1 iOS 9.3.5 iOS 9.3.5 is now available and addresses the following: Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to disclose kernel memory Description: A validation issue was addressed through improved input sanitization. CVE-2016-4655: Citizen Lab and Lookout Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4656: Citizen Lab and Lookout WebKit Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: Visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4657: Citizen Lab and Lookout Installation note: This update is available through iTunes and Software Update on your iOS device, and will not appear in your computer's Software Update application, or in the Apple Downloads site. Make sure you have an Internet connection and have installed the latest version of iTunes from www.apple.com/itunes/ iTunes and Software Update on the device will automatically check Apple's update server on its weekly schedule. When an update is detected, it is downloaded and the option to be installed is presented to the user when the iOS device is docked. We recommend applying the update immediately if possible. Selecting Don't Install will present the option the next time you connect your iOS device. The automatic update process may take up to a week depending on the day that iTunes or the device checks for updates. You may manually obtain the update via the Check for Updates button within iTunes, or the Software Update on your device. To check that the iPhone, iPod touch, or iPad has been updated: * Navigate to Settings * Select General * Select About. The version after applying this update will be "9.3.5". Information will also be posted to the Apple Security Updates web site: https://support.apple.com/kb/HT201222 This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and details are available at: https://www.apple.com/support/security/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXvzhMAAoJEIOj74w0bLRGBAMP/RvcCKskvhLhBTixjPNBWWqE VFuQCMGif3Q9/2vLv9tQxeesXdG30Rn7LkCSStR0ZhSPrNFlSDlhHj/KOLFd5en+ lgctmToXnLQl+FzTnN0Tn872R3VENBl78OiP6K1urDJHMs1OwGgORyyKQgcaGcDZ GCBK7PUaK/yKVXfm1SJsMcyNL3lRGd05OnCPaXJruMZlbTWidK7R649oodPIIX+H cokqXBjM94M/Y6BUbPAeEh4lSk6ukygYHeb+JuTTj0AQ+82qIkWctkZLIVHZDLak aaTxLFpH9T9BAOTKSnpwFZa0Nj912OSkFbIbCMNyCcX/l7z2Pd+EVg/7rEEZBW+I yyo67JsXWQtCP9/P5El3V1lepNfuGOpRM5S+B/X2X+774QV/Xx8blVXTeDdDAk++ bHblfQKx2Xlkrznl+SFLnDfY5d8TlRmLEcQu1N7DiN22I1Qi9eXdzicBrCHyY3s0 sFTj577aBQ2gyH6EWTg4VfZHKKXtzPTNuSpAwobK8HKacezUhCXQ0BScmS47UMHu uk/sdirJX1GAfD0P7bcOsnTdMHG+vkXIFTuV+JsGcpg136kdg7rejVIsj/AKRChz f+e/7YsJIpMQriDr4w07huosClXKqSw64ygPyP0KYHTjO1picPocw1SF7eqyeng0 C6oESP46AbWYUbdihpm7 =PDst -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . ========================================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-3166-1 January 10, 2017 webkit2gtk vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Summary: Several security issues were fixed in WebKitGTK+. Software Description: - webkit2gtk: JavaScript engine library from WebKitGTK+ - GObject introspection Details: A large number of security issues were discovered in the WebKitGTK+ Web and JavaScript engines. Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0-18 2.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37 2.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 This update uses a new upstream release, which includes additional bug fixes. After a standard system update you need to restart any applications that use WebKitGTK+, such as Epiphany, to make all the necessary changes. References: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3166-1 CVE-2016-4613, CVE-2016-4657, CVE-2016-4666, CVE-2016-4707, CVE-2016-4728, CVE-2016-4733, CVE-2016-4734, CVE-2016-4735, CVE-2016-4759, CVE-2016-4760, CVE-2016-4761, CVE-2016-4762, CVE-2016-4764, CVE-2016-4765, CVE-2016-4767, CVE-2016-4768, CVE-2016-4769, CVE-2016-7578 Package Information: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/2.14.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1

The kernel in Apple iOS before 9.3.5 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information from memory via a crafted app. Apple iOS is prone to a local information-disclosure vulnerability. Local attackers can leverage this issue to gain access to sensitive information. Information obtained may aid in further attacks. Kernel is one of the kernel components. CVE-2016-4655: Citizen Lab and Lookout iOS 10.0.1 also includes the security content of iOS 10. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 APPLE-SA-2016-08-25-1 iOS 9.3.5 iOS 9.3.5 is now available and addresses the following: Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to disclose kernel memory Description: A validation issue was addressed through improved input sanitization. CVE-2016-4655: Citizen Lab and Lookout Kernel Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4656: Citizen Lab and Lookout WebKit Available for: iPhone 4s and later, iPad 2 and later, iPod touch (5th generation) and later Impact: Visiting a maliciously crafted website may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-4657: Citizen Lab and Lookout Installation note: This update is available through iTunes and Software Update on your iOS device, and will not appear in your computer's Software Update application, or in the Apple Downloads site. Make sure you have an Internet connection and have installed the latest version of iTunes from www.apple.com/itunes/ iTunes and Software Update on the device will automatically check Apple's update server on its weekly schedule. When an update is detected, it is downloaded and the option to be installed is presented to the user when the iOS device is docked. We recommend applying the update immediately if possible. Selecting Don't Install will present the option the next time you connect your iOS device. The automatic update process may take up to a week depending on the day that iTunes or the device checks for updates. You may manually obtain the update via the Check for Updates button within iTunes, or the Software Update on your device. To check that the iPhone, iPod touch, or iPad has been updated: * Navigate to Settings * Select General * Select About. The version after applying this update will be "9.3.5". Information will also be posted to the Apple Security Updates web site: https://support.apple.com/kb/HT201222 This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and details are available at: https://www.apple.com/support/security/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXvzhMAAoJEIOj74w0bLRGBAMP/RvcCKskvhLhBTixjPNBWWqE VFuQCMGif3Q9/2vLv9tQxeesXdG30Rn7LkCSStR0ZhSPrNFlSDlhHj/KOLFd5en+ lgctmToXnLQl+FzTnN0Tn872R3VENBl78OiP6K1urDJHMs1OwGgORyyKQgcaGcDZ GCBK7PUaK/yKVXfm1SJsMcyNL3lRGd05OnCPaXJruMZlbTWidK7R649oodPIIX+H cokqXBjM94M/Y6BUbPAeEh4lSk6ukygYHeb+JuTTj0AQ+82qIkWctkZLIVHZDLak aaTxLFpH9T9BAOTKSnpwFZa0Nj912OSkFbIbCMNyCcX/l7z2Pd+EVg/7rEEZBW+I yyo67JsXWQtCP9/P5El3V1lepNfuGOpRM5S+B/X2X+774QV/Xx8blVXTeDdDAk++ bHblfQKx2Xlkrznl+SFLnDfY5d8TlRmLEcQu1N7DiN22I1Qi9eXdzicBrCHyY3s0 sFTj577aBQ2gyH6EWTg4VfZHKKXtzPTNuSpAwobK8HKacezUhCXQ0BScmS47UMHu uk/sdirJX1GAfD0P7bcOsnTdMHG+vkXIFTuV+JsGcpg136kdg7rejVIsj/AKRChz f+e/7YsJIpMQriDr4w07huosClXKqSw64ygPyP0KYHTjO1picPocw1SF7eqyeng0 C6oESP46AbWYUbdihpm7 =PDst -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the Hyper Management Module (HMM) in Huawei E9000 rack servers with software before V100R001C00SPC296 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service (web service outage) via a crafted XML document. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-284: Improper Access Control ( Inappropriate access control ) Has been identified. HuaweiE9000Chassis is a blade server of China's Huawei company. An XML external entity injection vulnerability exists in the HuaweiE9000ChassisV100R001C00 version. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to obtain sensitive information and may also cause a denial of service. Failed attacks may cause a denial-of-service condition

Huawei FusionCompute before V100R005C10CP7002 stores cleartext AES keys in a file, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. Huawei FusionCompute is prone to an information-disclosure vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to gain access to sensitive information; this may lead to further attacks. Huawei FusionCompute is an enterprise-level open server virtualization solution based on Xen open source design developed by China's Huawei (Huawei). The solution provides automation, advanced integration and management capabilities for virtualized data centers

The Tiger uRouter Wireless Router is an enterprise-class intelligent routing product produced and sold by China Tiger Technology. There are multiple vulnerabilities in the URouter wireless router. An unauthenticated attacker bypasses the system's authentication mechanism by providing a random SID cookie value to the router; accessing the router's system log can use the data in the log to hijack the router's administrator session; using a hard-coded SID Values to hijack DMS users, get administrator privileges on the router; inject system-level control commands, and execute these commands with root privileges.

Format string vulnerability in Huawei AR100, AR120, AR150, AR200, AR500, AR550, AR1200, AR2200, AR2500, AR3200, and AR3600 routers with software before V200R007C00SPC900 and NetEngine 16EX routers with software before V200R007C00SPC900 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via format string specifiers in vectors involving partial commands. Huawei AR120 is an AR series enterprise router product of China Huawei. A remote attacker could exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service. The following products and versions are affected: AR100, AR120, AR150, AR200, AR500, AR550, AR1200, AR2200, AR2500, AR3200, AR3600 V200R005, V200R006, V200R007C00, NetEngine 16EX V200R005, V200R00000, V20

The Intelligent Baseboard Management Controller (iBMC) in Huawei RH1288 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC613, RH2288 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC617, RH2288H V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC515, RH5885 V3 servers with software before V100R003C10SPC102, and XH620 V3, XH622 V3, and XH628 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC610 might allow remote attackers to decrypt encrypted data and consequently obtain sensitive information by leveraging selection of an insecure SSL encryption algorithm. plural Huawei Product Intelligent Baseboard Management Controller (iBMC) Contains a vulnerability that can decrypt encrypted data and, as a result, retrieve important information.Unsafe by a third party SSL By using the choice of encryption algorithm, the encrypted data can be decrypted and as a result, important information can be obtained. HuaweiRH1288 and other servers are Huawei's servers in China. An insecure encryption algorithm vulnerability exists in several Huawei products. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information. Huawei Servers are prone to a security weakness. The following products and versions are affected: The following products and versions are affected: Huawei RH1288 V3 V100R003C00SPC613 previous version, RH2288 V3 V100R003C00SPC617 previous version, RH2288H V3 V100R003C00SPC515 previous version, RH5885 V3 V100R003C10SPC102 previous version, XH620 V3 , XH622 V3 , XH628 Versions earlier than V3 V100R003C00SPC610

The Intelligent Baseboard Management Controller (iBMC) in Huawei RH1288 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC613; RH2288 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC617; RH2288H V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC515; RH5885 V3 servers with software before V100R003C10SPC102; and XH620 V3, XH622 V3, and XH628 V3 servers with software before V100R003C00SPC610 allows local users to cause a denial of service (iBMC resource consumption) via unspecified vectors. plural Huawei Product Intelligent Baseboard Management Controller (iBMC) The denial of service (iBMC Resource consumption ) There is a vulnerability that can be exploited.Denial of service by local user (iBMC Resource consumption ) May be in a state. Multiple Huawei Servers are prone to a local denial-of-service vulnerability. A local attacker can exploit this issue to cause a denial-of-service condition. Intelligent Baseboard Management Controller (iBMC) is one of the software used to manage the server control unit. There are resource management vulnerabilities in the iBMC of various Huawei servers. The following products and versions are affected: Huawei RH1288 V3 V100R003C00SPC613 previous version, RH2288 V3 V100R003C00SPC617 previous version, RH2288H V3 V100R003C00SPC515 previous version, RH5885 V3 V100R003C10SPC102 previous version, XH620 V3 , XH622 V3 , XH628 V3 V100R003C00SPC610 previous version

Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client before 4.2.05015 and 4.3.x before 4.3.02039 mishandles pathnames, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted INF file, aka Bug ID CSCuz92464. A local attacker may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary commands with elevated SYSTEM privileges. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuz92464. The vulnerability is caused by the program not handling path names correctly

The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short. OpenSSL is prone to denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker may exploit this issue to cause a denial-of-service condition. OpenSSL Security Advisory [22 Sep 2016] ======================================== OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth (CVE-2016-6304) ===================================================================== Severity: High A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation, sending a large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will be unbounded memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a Denial Of Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a default configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP. Builds using the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected. Servers using OpenSSL versions prior to 1.0.1g are not vulnerable in a default configuration, instead only if an application explicitly enables OCSP stapling support. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 29th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SSL_peek() hang on empty record (CVE-2016-6305) =============================================== Severity: Moderate OpenSSL 1.1.0 SSL/TLS will hang during a call to SSL_peek() if the peer sends an empty record. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial Of Service attack. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 10th September 2016 by Alex Gaynor. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SWEET32 Mitigation (CVE-2016-2183) ================================== Severity: Low SWEET32 (https://sweet32.info) is an attack on older block cipher algorithms that use a block size of 64 bits. In mitigation for the SWEET32 attack DES based ciphersuites have been moved from the HIGH cipherstring group to MEDIUM in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and OpenSSL 1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.1.0 since release has had these ciphersuites disabled by default. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 16th August 2016 by Karthikeyan Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent (INRIA). The fix was developed by Rich Salz of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in MDC2_Update() (CVE-2016-6303) ========================================== Severity: Low An overflow can occur in MDC2_Update() either if called directly or through the EVP_DigestUpdate() function using MDC2. If an attacker is able to supply very large amounts of input data after a previous call to EVP_EncryptUpdate() with a partial block then a length check can overflow resulting in a heap corruption. The amount of data needed is comparable to SIZE_MAX which is impractical on most platforms. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 11th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302) =========================================== Severity: Low If a server uses SHA512 for TLS session ticket HMAC it is vulnerable to a DoS attack where a malformed ticket will result in an OOB read which will ultimately crash. The use of SHA512 in TLS session tickets is comparatively rare as it requires a custom server callback and ticket lookup mechanism. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 19th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in BN_bn2dec() (CVE-2016-2182) ======================================== Severity: Low The function BN_bn2dec() does not check the return value of BN_div_word(). This can cause an OOB write if an application uses this function with an overly large BIGNUM. This could be a problem if an overly large certificate or CRL is printed out from an untrusted source. TLS is not affected because record limits will reject an oversized certificate before it is parsed. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 2nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB read in TS_OBJ_print_bio() (CVE-2016-2180) ============================================== Severity: Low The function TS_OBJ_print_bio() misuses OBJ_obj2txt(): the return value is the total length the OID text representation would use and not the amount of data written. This will result in OOB reads when large OIDs are presented. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st July 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Pointer arithmetic undefined behaviour (CVE-2016-2177) ====================================================== Severity: Low Avoid some undefined pointer arithmetic A common idiom in the codebase is to check limits in the following manner: "p + len > limit" Where "p" points to some malloc'd data of SIZE bytes and limit == p + SIZE "len" here could be from some externally supplied data (e.g. from a TLS message). The rules of C pointer arithmetic are such that "p + len" is only well defined where len <= SIZE. Therefore the above idiom is actually undefined behaviour. For example this could cause problems if some malloc implementation provides an address for "p" such that "p + len" actually overflows for values of len that are too big and therefore p + len < limit. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 4th May 2016 by Guido Vranken. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Constant time flag not preserved in DSA signing (CVE-2016-2178) =============================================================== Severity: Low Operations in the DSA signing algorithm should run in constant time in order to avoid side channel attacks. A flaw in the OpenSSL DSA implementation means that a non-constant time codepath is followed for certain operations. This has been demonstrated through a cache-timing attack to be sufficient for an attacker to recover the private DSA key. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 23rd May 2016 by César Pereida (Aalto University), Billy Brumley (Tampere University of Technology), and Yuval Yarom (The University of Adelaide and NICTA). The fix was developed by César Pereida. DTLS buffered message DoS (CVE-2016-2179) ========================================= Severity: Low In a DTLS connection where handshake messages are delivered out-of-order those messages that OpenSSL is not yet ready to process will be buffered for later use. Under certain circumstances, a flaw in the logic means that those messages do not get removed from the buffer even though the handshake has been completed. An attacker could force up to approx. 15 messages to remain in the buffer when they are no longer required. These messages will be cleared when the DTLS connection is closed. The default maximum size for a message is 100k. Therefore the attacker could force an additional 1500k to be consumed per connection. By opening many simulataneous connections an attacker could cause a DoS attack through memory exhaustion. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd June 2016 by Quan Luo. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. DTLS replay protection DoS (CVE-2016-2181) ========================================== Severity: Low A flaw in the DTLS replay attack protection mechanism means that records that arrive for future epochs update the replay protection "window" before the MAC for the record has been validated. This could be exploited by an attacker by sending a record for the next epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very large sequence number. This means that all subsequent legitimate packets are dropped causing a denial of service for a specific DTLS connection. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st November 2015 by the OCAP audit team. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Certificate message OOB reads (CVE-2016-6306) ============================================= Severity: Low In OpenSSL 1.0.2 and earlier some missing message length checks can result in OOB reads of up to 2 bytes beyond an allocated buffer. There is a theoretical DoS risk but this has not been observed in practice on common platforms. The messages affected are client certificate, client certificate request and server certificate. As a result the attack can only be performed against a client or a server which enables client authentication. OpenSSL 1.1.0 is not affected. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header() (CVE-2016-6307) ========================================================================== Severity: Low A TLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect DTLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 TLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in dtls1_preprocess_fragment() (CVE-2016-6308) ============================================================================= Severity: Low This issue is very similar to CVE-2016-6307. The underlying defect is different but the security analysis and impacts are the same except that it impacts DTLS. A DTLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect TLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Note ==== As per our previous announcements and our Release Strategy (https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html), support for OpenSSL version 1.0.1 will cease on 31st December 2016. No security updates for that version will be provided after that date. Users of 1.0.1 are advised to upgrade. Support for versions 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 ended on 31st December 2015. Those versions are no longer receiving security updates. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time. For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see: https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ===================================================================== Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Important: openssl security update Advisory ID: RHSA-2016:1940-01 Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advisory URL: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1940.html Issue date: 2016-09-27 CVE Names: CVE-2016-2177 CVE-2016-2178 CVE-2016-2179 CVE-2016-2180 CVE-2016-2181 CVE-2016-2182 CVE-2016-6302 CVE-2016-6304 CVE-2016-6306 ===================================================================== 1. Summary: An update for openssl is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7) - ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) - i386, ppc64, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7) - ppc64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7) - x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6) - i386, x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7) - x86_64 3. Description: OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library. A remote attacker could cause a TLS server using OpenSSL to consume an excessive amount of memory and, possibly, exit unexpectedly after exhausting all available memory, if it enabled OCSP stapling support. (CVE-2016-2178) * It was discovered that the Datagram TLS (DTLS) implementation could fail to release memory in certain cases. A malicious DTLS client could cause a DTLS server using OpenSSL to consume an excessive amount of memory and, possibly, exit unexpectedly after exhausting all available memory. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to make a DTLS server using OpenSSL to reject further packets sent from a DTLS client over an established DTLS connection. (CVE-2016-2181) * An out of bounds write flaw was discovered in the OpenSSL BN_bn2dec() function. (CVE-2016-2182) * A flaw was found in the DES/3DES cipher was used as part of the TLS/SSL protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to recover some plaintext data by capturing large amounts of encrypted traffic between TLS/SSL server and client if the communication used a DES/3DES based ciphersuite. (CVE-2016-2183) This update mitigates the CVE-2016-2183 issue by lowering priority of DES cipher suites so they are not preferred over cipher suites using AES. For compatibility reasons, DES cipher suites remain enabled by default and included in the set of cipher suites identified by the HIGH cipher string. Future updates may move them to MEDIUM or not enable them by default. * An integer underflow flaw leading to a buffer over-read was found in the way OpenSSL parsed TLS session tickets. (CVE-2016-6302) * Multiple integer overflow flaws were found in the way OpenSSL performed pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to cause a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL to crash. (CVE-2016-2177) * An out of bounds read flaw was found in the way OpenSSL formatted Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol data for printing. An attacker could possibly cause an application using OpenSSL to crash if it printed time stamp data from the attacker. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to crash a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL. (CVE-2016-6306) Red Hat would like to thank the OpenSSL project for reporting CVE-2016-6304 and CVE-2016-6306 and OpenVPN for reporting CVE-2016-2183. 4. Solution: For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 For the update to take effect, all services linked to the OpenSSL library must be restarted, or the system rebooted. 5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/): 1341705 - CVE-2016-2177 openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase 1343400 - CVE-2016-2178 openssl: Non-constant time codepath followed for certain operations in DSA implementation 1359615 - CVE-2016-2180 OpenSSL: OOB read in TS_OBJ_print_bio() 1367340 - CVE-2016-2182 openssl: Out-of-bounds write caused by unchecked errors in BN_bn2dec() 1369113 - CVE-2016-2181 openssl: DTLS replay protection bypass allows DoS against DTLS connection 1369383 - CVE-2016-2183 SSL/TLS: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers (SWEET32) 1369504 - CVE-2016-2179 openssl: DTLS memory exhaustion DoS when messages are not removed from fragment buffer 1369855 - CVE-2016-6302 openssl: Insufficient TLS session ticket HMAC length checks 1377594 - CVE-2016-6306 openssl: certificate message OOB reads 1377600 - CVE-2016-6304 openssl: OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth 6. Package List: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node Optional (v. 6): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.ppc64.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 6): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.src.rpm i386: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 6): i386: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.i686.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-48.el6_8.3.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux ComputeNode Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm ppc64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm s390x: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7): ppc64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64.rpm ppc64le: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.ppc64le.rpm s390x: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.s390x.rpm x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation (v. 7): Source: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.src.rpm x86_64: openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-devel-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-libs-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation Optional (v. 7): x86_64: openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-perl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.i686.rpm openssl-static-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.7.x86_64.rpm These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security. Our key and details on how to verify the signature are available from https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/ 7. References: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2177 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2178 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2179 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2180 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2181 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2182 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6302 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6304 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6306 https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt 8. Contact: The Red Hat security contact is <secalert@redhat.com>. More contact details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/ Copyright 2016 Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iD8DBQFX6nnFXlSAg2UNWIIRAqklAJ9uGMit/wxZ0CfuGjR7Vi2+AjmGMwCfTpEI xpTW7ApBLmKhVjs49DGYouI= =4VgY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- RHSA-announce mailing list RHSA-announce@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce . Additional information can be found at https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/06/27/undefined-pointer-arithmetic/ CVE-2016-2178 Cesar Pereida, Billy Brumley and Yuval Yarom discovered a timing leak in the DSA code. CVE-2016-2179 / CVE-2016-2181 Quan Luo and the OCAP audit team discovered denial of service vulnerabilities in DTLS. For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.1t-1+deb8u4. For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon. ========================================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-3087-2 September 23, 2016 openssl regression ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update fixes the problem. We apologize for the inconvenience. This issue has only been addressed in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS in this update. (CVE-2016-2178) Quan Luo discovered that OpenSSL did not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries in the DTLS implementation. (CVE-2016-2181) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated division results. (CVE-2016-2182) Karthik Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent discovered that the DES and Triple DES ciphers were vulnerable to birthday attacks. (CVE-2016-2183) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain ticket lengths. (CVE-2016-6303) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly performed certain message length checks. (CVE-2016-6306) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.38 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. Description: This release adds the new Apache HTTP Server 2.4.29 packages that are part of the JBoss Core Services offering. This release serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.23, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. Refer to the Release Notes for information on the most significant bug fixes, enhancements and component upgrades included in this release. Solution: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. JIRA issues fixed (https://issues.jboss.org/): JBCS-373 - Errata for httpd 2.4.29 GA RHEL 7 7

Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) before V200R001C00SPC200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via "special characters," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7109. Huawei UMA is prone to multiple command-injection vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit these issues to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code in the context of the application. Failed attacks may cause a denial-of-service condition. Versions prior to UMA V200R001C00SPC200 are vulnerable. Through the centralized management and control of accounts, authentication, authorization and audit of various IT resources, the platform can meet the needs of users for IT operation and maintenance management and IT internal control and external audit. A remote attacker can use specially crafted characters to exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information of the device, or modify device data, causing the device to fail

Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) before V200R001C00SPC200 SPH206 allows remote authenticated users to obtain the MD5 hashes of arbitrary user passwords via unspecified vectors. Huawei UMA is prone to a security-bypass vulnerability and an information-disclosure vulnerability. Attackers can exploit these issues to bypass security restrictions and gain access to potentially sensitive information. This may aid in other attacks. Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) is a set of IT core resource operation and maintenance management and security audit platform of China Huawei (Huawei). Through the centralized management and control of accounts, authentication, authorization and audit of various IT resources, the platform can meet the needs of users for IT operation and maintenance management and IT internal control and external audit. Information disclosure vulnerabilities exist in Huawei UMA V200R001C00SPC200 and earlier versions

Huawei Unified Maintenance Audit (UMA) before V200R001C00SPC200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via "special characters," a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-7110. Huawei UMA is prone to multiple command-injection vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit these issues to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code in the context of the application. Failed attacks may cause a denial-of-service condition. Versions prior to UMA V200R001C00SPC200 are vulnerable. Through the centralized management and control of accounts, authentication, authorization and audit of various IT resources, the platform can meet the needs of users for IT operation and maintenance management and IT internal control and external audit