VARIoT IoT vulnerabilities database

Moxa OnCell G3100V2 devices before 2.8 and G3111, G3151, G3211, and G3251 devices before 1.7 use cleartext password storage, which makes it easier for local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a configuration file. MoxaOnCellG3100V2 and so on are Moxa's IP gateway products. Moxa OnCell is prone to local information-disclosure vulnerability. The following products are affected : Moxa OnCell G3100V2 Series, editions prior to Version 2.8. Moxa OnCell G3111/G3151/G3211/G3251 Series,editions prior to 1.7

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, and CVE-2016-4270. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4265 , CVE-2016-4266 , CVE-2016-4267 , CVE-2016-4268 ,and CVE-2016-4270 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of FlateDecode streams. A crafted FlateDecode stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause a denial-of-service condition. Adobe Reader, etc. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, and CVE-2016-4269. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4265 , CVE-2016-4266 , CVE-2016-4267 , CVE-2016-4268 ,and CVE-2016-4269 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of Font streams. A crafted Font stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Adobe Reader and Acrobat are prone to an memory-corruption vulnerability. Failed exploit attempts will likely result in denial-of-service conditions. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4268, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4265 , CVE-2016-4266 , CVE-2016-4268 , CVE-2016-4269 ,and CVE-2016-4270 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of FlateDecode streams. A crafted FlateDecode stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Adobe Acrobat and Reader is prone to memory-corruption vulnerability. Failed exploit attempts will likely result in denial-of-service conditions. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4265 , CVE-2016-4266 , CVE-2016-4267 , CVE-2016-4269 ,and CVE-2016-4270 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of Font streams. A crafted Font stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause a denial-of-service condition. Adobe Reader, etc. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4265 , CVE-2016-4267 , CVE-2016-4268 , CVE-2016-4269 ,and CVE-2016-4270 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of FlateDecode streams. A crafted FlateDecode stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Adobe Reader and Acrobat are prone to an memory-corruption vulnerability. Failed attacks may cause a denial-of-service condition. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. This vulnerability CVE-2016-4191 , CVE-2016-4192 , CVE-2016-4193 , CVE-2016-4194 , CVE-2016-4195 , CVE-2016-4196 , CVE-2016-4197 , CVE-2016-4198 , CVE-2016-4199 , CVE-2016-4200 , CVE-2016-4201 , CVE-2016-4202 , CVE-2016-4203 , CVE-2016-4204 , CVE-2016-4205 , CVE-2016-4206 , CVE-2016-4207 , CVE-2016-4208 , CVE-2016-4211 , CVE-2016-4212 , CVE-2016-4213 , CVE-2016-4214 , CVE-2016-4250 , CVE-2016-4251 , CVE-2016-4252 , CVE-2016-4254 , CVE-2016-4266 , CVE-2016-4267 , CVE-2016-4268 , CVE-2016-4269 ,and CVE-2016-4270 Is a different vulnerability.An attacker could execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service ( Memory corruption ) There is a possibility of being put into a state. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Adobe Reader DC. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.The specific flaw exists within the handling of FlateDecode streams. A crafted FlateDecode stream can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. Failed exploit attempts will likely cause a denial-of-service condition. Adobe Reader, etc. are all products of Adobe (Adobe) in the United States. Adobe Reader is a free PDF file reader; Acrobat is a PDF file editing and conversion tool; Acrobat Reader DC is a set of tools for viewing, printing and annotating PDF. Security flaws exist in several Adobe products

Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. OpenSSL of crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c of MDC2_Update The function contains an integer overflow vulnerability. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write ( Out-of-bounds writing ) Has been identified. http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.htmlService disruption by a third party ( Out-of-bounds writes and application crashes ) There is a possibility of being affected unspecified, such as being in a state. OpenSSL is prone to an integer-overflow vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code in the context of the user running the affected application. Failed exploit attempts will likely result in denial-of-service conditions. OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.0 are affected. OpenSSL Security Advisory [22 Sep 2016] ======================================== OCSP Status Request extension unbounded memory growth (CVE-2016-6304) ===================================================================== Severity: High A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation, sending a large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will be unbounded memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a Denial Of Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a default configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP. Builds using the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected. Servers using OpenSSL versions prior to 1.0.1g are not vulnerable in a default configuration, instead only if an application explicitly enables OCSP stapling support. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 29th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SSL_peek() hang on empty record (CVE-2016-6305) =============================================== Severity: Moderate OpenSSL 1.1.0 SSL/TLS will hang during a call to SSL_peek() if the peer sends an empty record. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial Of Service attack. OpenSSL 1.1.0 users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 10th September 2016 by Alex Gaynor. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. SWEET32 Mitigation (CVE-2016-2183) ================================== Severity: Low SWEET32 (https://sweet32.info) is an attack on older block cipher algorithms that use a block size of 64 bits. In mitigation for the SWEET32 attack DES based ciphersuites have been moved from the HIGH cipherstring group to MEDIUM in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and OpenSSL 1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.1.0 since release has had these ciphersuites disabled by default. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 16th August 2016 by Karthikeyan Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent (INRIA). The fix was developed by Rich Salz of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in MDC2_Update() (CVE-2016-6303) ========================================== Severity: Low An overflow can occur in MDC2_Update() either if called directly or through the EVP_DigestUpdate() function using MDC2. If an attacker is able to supply very large amounts of input data after a previous call to EVP_EncryptUpdate() with a partial block then a length check can overflow resulting in a heap corruption. The amount of data needed is comparable to SIZE_MAX which is impractical on most platforms. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 11th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Malformed SHA512 ticket DoS (CVE-2016-6302) =========================================== Severity: Low If a server uses SHA512 for TLS session ticket HMAC it is vulnerable to a DoS attack where a malformed ticket will result in an OOB read which will ultimately crash. The use of SHA512 in TLS session tickets is comparatively rare as it requires a custom server callback and ticket lookup mechanism. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 19th August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB write in BN_bn2dec() (CVE-2016-2182) ======================================== Severity: Low The function BN_bn2dec() does not check the return value of BN_div_word(). This can cause an OOB write if an application uses this function with an overly large BIGNUM. This could be a problem if an overly large certificate or CRL is printed out from an untrusted source. TLS is not affected because record limits will reject an oversized certificate before it is parsed. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 2nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. OOB read in TS_OBJ_print_bio() (CVE-2016-2180) ============================================== Severity: Low The function TS_OBJ_print_bio() misuses OBJ_obj2txt(): the return value is the total length the OID text representation would use and not the amount of data written. This will result in OOB reads when large OIDs are presented. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st July 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Pointer arithmetic undefined behaviour (CVE-2016-2177) ====================================================== Severity: Low Avoid some undefined pointer arithmetic A common idiom in the codebase is to check limits in the following manner: "p + len > limit" Where "p" points to some malloc'd data of SIZE bytes and limit == p + SIZE "len" here could be from some externally supplied data (e.g. from a TLS message). The rules of C pointer arithmetic are such that "p + len" is only well defined where len <= SIZE. Therefore the above idiom is actually undefined behaviour. For example this could cause problems if some malloc implementation provides an address for "p" such that "p + len" actually overflows for values of len that are too big and therefore p + len < limit. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 4th May 2016 by Guido Vranken. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Constant time flag not preserved in DSA signing (CVE-2016-2178) =============================================================== Severity: Low Operations in the DSA signing algorithm should run in constant time in order to avoid side channel attacks. A flaw in the OpenSSL DSA implementation means that a non-constant time codepath is followed for certain operations. This has been demonstrated through a cache-timing attack to be sufficient for an attacker to recover the private DSA key. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 23rd May 2016 by César Pereida (Aalto University), Billy Brumley (Tampere University of Technology), and Yuval Yarom (The University of Adelaide and NICTA). The fix was developed by César Pereida. DTLS buffered message DoS (CVE-2016-2179) ========================================= Severity: Low In a DTLS connection where handshake messages are delivered out-of-order those messages that OpenSSL is not yet ready to process will be buffered for later use. Under certain circumstances, a flaw in the logic means that those messages do not get removed from the buffer even though the handshake has been completed. An attacker could force up to approx. 15 messages to remain in the buffer when they are no longer required. These messages will be cleared when the DTLS connection is closed. The default maximum size for a message is 100k. Therefore the attacker could force an additional 1500k to be consumed per connection. By opening many simulataneous connections an attacker could cause a DoS attack through memory exhaustion. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd June 2016 by Quan Luo. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. DTLS replay protection DoS (CVE-2016-2181) ========================================== Severity: Low A flaw in the DTLS replay attack protection mechanism means that records that arrive for future epochs update the replay protection "window" before the MAC for the record has been validated. This could be exploited by an attacker by sending a record for the next epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very large sequence number. This means that all subsequent legitimate packets are dropped causing a denial of service for a specific DTLS connection. OpenSSL 1.0.2 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 21st November 2015 by the OCAP audit team. The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Certificate message OOB reads (CVE-2016-6306) ============================================= Severity: Low In OpenSSL 1.0.2 and earlier some missing message length checks can result in OOB reads of up to 2 bytes beyond an allocated buffer. There is a theoretical DoS risk but this has not been observed in practice on common platforms. The messages affected are client certificate, client certificate request and server certificate. As a result the attack can only be performed against a client or a server which enables client authentication. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2i OpenSSL 1.0.1 users should upgrade to 1.0.1u This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 22nd August 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Stephen Henson of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in tls_get_message_header() (CVE-2016-6307) ========================================================================== Severity: Low A TLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect DTLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 TLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Excessive allocation of memory in dtls1_preprocess_fragment() (CVE-2016-6308) ============================================================================= Severity: Low This issue is very similar to CVE-2016-6307. The underlying defect is different but the security analysis and impacts are the same except that it impacts DTLS. A DTLS message includes 3 bytes for its length in the header for the message. This would allow for messages up to 16Mb in length. Messages of this length are excessive and OpenSSL includes a check to ensure that a peer is sending reasonably sized messages in order to avoid too much memory being consumed to service a connection. A flaw in the logic of version 1.1.0 means that memory for the message is allocated too early, prior to the excessive message length check. Due to way memory is allocated in OpenSSL this could mean an attacker could force up to 21Mb to be allocated to service a connection. This could lead to a Denial of Service through memory exhaustion. However, the excessive message length check still takes place, and this would cause the connection to immediately fail. Assuming that the application calls SSL_free() on the failed conneciton in a timely manner then the 21Mb of allocated memory will then be immediately freed again. Therefore the excessive memory allocation will be transitory in nature. This then means that there is only a security impact if: 1) The application does not call SSL_free() in a timely manner in the event that the connection fails or 2) The application is working in a constrained environment where there is very little free memory or 3) The attacker initiates multiple connection attempts such that there are multiple connections in a state where memory has been allocated for the connection; SSL_free() has not yet been called; and there is insufficient memory to service the multiple requests. Except in the instance of (1) above any Denial Of Service is likely to be transitory because as soon as the connection fails the memory is subsequently freed again in the SSL_free() call. However there is an increased risk during this period of application crashes due to the lack of memory - which would then mean a more serious Denial of Service. This issue does not affect TLS users. OpenSSL 1.1.0 DTLS users should upgrade to 1.1.0a This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 18th September 2016 by Shi Lei (Gear Team, Qihoo 360 Inc.). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell of the OpenSSL development team. Note ==== As per our previous announcements and our Release Strategy (https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html), support for OpenSSL version 1.0.1 will cease on 31st December 2016. No security updates for that version will be provided after that date. Users of 1.0.1 are advised to upgrade. Support for versions 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 ended on 31st December 2015. Those versions are no longer receiving security updates. References ========== URL for this Security Advisory: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details over time. For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see: https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 APPLE-SA-2016-12-13-1 macOS 10.12.2 macOS 10.12.2 is now available and addresses the following: apache_mod_php Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A remote attacker may cause an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution Description: Multiple issues existed in PHP before 5.6.26. These were addressed by updating PHP to version 5.6.26. CVE-2016-7411 CVE-2016-7412 CVE-2016-7413 CVE-2016-7414 CVE-2016-7416 CVE-2016-7417 CVE-2016-7418 AppleGraphicsPowerManagement Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to cause a system denial of service Description: A null pointer dereference was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7609: daybreaker@Minionz working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative Assets Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local attacker may modify downloaded mobile assets Description: A permissions issue existed in mobile assets. This issue was addressed through improved access restrictions. CVE-2016-7628: an anonymous researcher Audio Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted file may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7658: Haohao Kong of Keen Lab (@keen_lab) of Tencent CVE-2016-7659: Haohao Kong of Keen Lab (@keen_lab) of Tencent Bluetooth Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1, OS X El Capitan v10.11.6, and OS X Yosemite v10.10.5 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7596: Pekka Oikarainen, Matias Karhumaa and Marko Laakso of Synopsys Software Integrity Group Bluetooth Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to cause a denial of service Description: A null pointer dereference was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7605: daybreaker of Minionz Bluetooth Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with system privileges Description: A type confusion issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7617: Radu Motspan working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative, Ian Beer of Google Project Zero CoreCapture Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 and OS X El Capitan v10.11.6 Impact: A local user may be able to cause a system denial of service Description: A null pointer dereference was addressed through improved state management. CVE-2016-7604: daybreaker of Minionz CoreFoundation Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing malicious strings may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue existed in the processing of strings. This issue was addressed through improved bounds checking. CVE-2016-7663: an anonymous researcher CoreGraphics Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to unexpected application termination Description: A null pointer dereference was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7627: TRAPMINE Inc. & Meysam Firouzi @R00tkitSMM CoreMedia External Displays Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local application may be able to execute arbitrary code in the context of the mediaserver daemon Description: A type confusion issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7655: Keen Lab working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative CoreMedia Playback Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted .mp4 file may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7588: dragonltx of Huawei 2012 Laboratories CoreStorage Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to cause a system denial of service Description: A null pointer dereference was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7603: daybreaker@Minionz working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative CoreText Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: Multiple memory corruption issues existed in the handling of font files. These issues were addressed through improved bounds checking. CVE-2016-7595: riusksk(ae3aY=) of Tencent Security Platform Department curl Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to leak sensitive user information Description: Multiple issues existed in curl. These issues were addressed by updating to curl version 7.51.0. CVE-2016-5419 CVE-2016-5420 CVE-2016-5421 CVE-2016-7141 CVE-2016-7167 CVE-2016-8615 CVE-2016-8616 CVE-2016-8617 CVE-2016-8618 CVE-2016-8619 CVE-2016-8620 CVE-2016-8621 CVE-2016-8622 CVE-2016-8623 CVE-2016-8624 CVE-2016-8625 Directory Services Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to gain root privileges Description: A use after free issue was addressed through improved memory management. CVE-2016-7633: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero Disk Images Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7616: daybreaker@Minionz working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative FontParser Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: Multiple memory corruption issues existed in the handling of font files. These issues were addressed through improved bounds checking. CVE-2016-4691: riusksk(ae3aY=) of Tencent Security Platform Department FontParser Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing a maliciously crafted font file may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A buffer overflow existed in the handling of font files. This issue was addressed through improved bounds checking. CVE-2016-4688: Simon Huang of Alipay company, thelongestusernameofall@gmail.com Foundation Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Opening a maliciously crafted .gcx file may lead to unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7618: riusksk(ae3aY=) of Tencent Security Platform Department Grapher Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Opening a maliciously crafted .gcx file may lead to unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7622: riusksk(ae3aY=) of Tencent Security Platform Department ICU Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7594: AndrA(c) Bargull ImageIO Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A remote attacker may be able to leak memory Description: An out-of-bounds read was addressed through improved bounds checking. CVE-2016-7643: Yangkang (@dnpushme) of Qihoo360 Qex Team Intel Graphics Driver Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7602: daybreaker@Minionz working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative IOAcceleratorFamily Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to determine kernel memory layout Description: A shared memory issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7624 : Qidan He (@flanker_hqd) from KeenLab working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative IOFireWireFamily Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local attacker may be able to read kernel memory Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7608: Brandon Azad IOHIDFamily Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-1823: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero IOHIDFamily Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local application with system privileges may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A use after free issue was addressed through improved memory management. CVE-2016-7591: daybreaker of Minionz IOKit Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to determine kernel memory layout Description: A shared memory issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7625: Qidan He (@flanker_hqd) from KeenLab working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative IOKit Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to read kernel memory Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7657: Keen Lab working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative IOSurface Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to determine kernel memory layout Description: A shared memory issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7620: Qidan He (@flanker_hqd) from KeenLab working with Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: Multiple memory corruption issues were addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7606: @cocoahuke, Chen Qin of Topsec Alpha Team (topsec.com) CVE-2016-7612: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to read kernel memory Description: An insufficient initialization issue was addressed by properly initializing memory returned to user space. CVE-2016-7607: Brandon Azad Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to cause a system denial of service Description: A denial of service issue was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-7615: The UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to cause an unexpected system termination or arbitrary code execution in the kernel Description: A use after free issue was addressed through improved memory management. CVE-2016-7621: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to gain root privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7637: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero Kernel Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local application with system privileges may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A use after free issue was addressed through improved memory management. CVE-2016-7644: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero kext tools Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An application may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges Description: A memory corruption issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-7629: @cocoahuke libarchive Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local attacker may be able to overwrite existing files Description: A validation issue existed in the handling of symlinks. This issue was addressed through improved validation of symlinks. CVE-2016-7619: an anonymous researcher LibreSSL Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 and OS X El Capitan v10.11.6 Impact: An attacker with a privileged network position may be able to cause a denial of service Description: A denial of service issue in unbounded OCSP growth was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-6304 OpenLDAP Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An attacker may be able to exploit weaknesses in the RC4 cryptographic algorithm Description: RC4 was removed as a default cipher. CVE-2016-1777: Pepi Zawodsky OpenPAM Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local unprivileged user may gain access to privileged applications Description: PAM authentication within sandboxed applications failed insecurely. This was addressed with improved error handling. This issue was addressed through improved input validation. CVE-2016-6303 OpenSSL Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An attacker with a privileged network position may be able to cause a denial of service Description: A denial of service issue in unbounded OCSP growth was addressed through improved memory handling. CVE-2016-6304 Power Management Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to gain root privileges Description: An issue in mach port name references was addressed through improved validation. CVE-2016-7661: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero Security Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An attacker may be able to exploit weaknesses in the 3DES cryptographic algorithm Description: 3DES was removed as a default cipher. CVE-2016-4693: GaA<<tan Leurent and Karthikeyan Bhargavan from INRIA Paris Security Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to cause a denial of service Description: A validation issue existed in the handling of OCSP responder URLs. This issue was addressed by verifying OCSP revocation status after CA validation and limiting the number of OCSP requests per certificate. CVE-2016-7636: Maksymilian Arciemowicz (cxsecurity.com) Security Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: Certificates may be unexpectedly evaluated as trusted Description: A certificate evaluation issue existed in certificate validation. This issue was addressed through additional validation of certificates. CVE-2016-7662: Apple syslog Available for: macOS Sierra 10.12.1 Impact: A local user may be able to gain root privileges Description: An issue in mach port name references was addressed through improved validation. CVE-2016-7660: Ian Beer of Google Project Zero macOS 10.12.2 may be obtained from the Mac App Store or Apple's Software Downloads web site: https://www.apple.com/support/downloads/ Information will also be posted to the Apple Security Updates web site: https://support.apple.com/kb/HT201222 This message is signed with Apple's Product Security PGP key, and details are available at: https://www.apple.com/support/security/pgp/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYT7LKAAoJEIOj74w0bLRGfKwQAN3nnwHgJNE+obIjTzpTHLlh mMQYstsO8Mcj4hjIgTCHuQr1tDldva0IZEivoYAbyXAgM9xKlIbpqBQ5TE94l3nl xTTeVqtozCCdRT36mphvwhPEp38lvclUU1IGxyvP6ieK0dHUKS8LhL9MpnaOinrX UhSiXkMs9tTZI5SgkumzBmg10oOwDnMvZDrwTcxe9vjU26V9S7+VpfsguefwDSLE fHYX4KksoEUZuDdUBrfX2+03QbqYxBjQR9IRdpcX56laq1TGUMTKwkTi9DxJlByP SJl3uvVhqWf1UkYH6x5N/gC9lXq5QO6L7W3W2rRqTtgr2UMPZsBuf0srK/lFmPvC c63thvcZyPk0cDcE7k0ZmlJx+7ihFIiPKdGwLoX5Rl6Zr29Wh9aGKhzUUYO12PUh +x18HRwXxvSv9TXAUYQu5hD48SuhUiMEBO8Qq7Z8XPFEUSJXY2AjGjai9mJYNfC4 OELKPPvYnNSd3m8YGvWY8gWgwyRP0es6U3d5rGatEpA1qcIFmUrHFhpvveL6SRSY xPQgjB/aohg/fDf3jDO1kjR7+v83B+ObbCr8MOgqGNtG3GqOimMOa8XuSMbV7+3u 0kivBY8fxYdBy0pXDdBgv+AHaTue+wgP5tQXFiAxm61Fv+uz/yvR22uaJ39P5cJf msyz+/zQNISkly6K0VBO =0QW0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- . Additional information can be found at https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/06/27/undefined-pointer-arithmetic/ CVE-2016-2178 Cesar Pereida, Billy Brumley and Yuval Yarom discovered a timing leak in the DSA code. CVE-2016-2179 / CVE-2016-2181 Quan Luo and the OCAP audit team discovered denial of service vulnerabilities in DTLS. For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in version 1.0.1t-1+deb8u4. For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will be fixed soon. ========================================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-3087-2 September 23, 2016 openssl regression ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Summary: USN-3087-1 introduced a regression in OpenSSL. Software Description: - openssl: Secure Socket Layer (SSL) cryptographic library and tools Details: USN-3087-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenSSL. The fix for CVE-2016-2182 was incomplete and caused a regression when parsing certificates. This update fixes the problem. We apologize for the inconvenience. (CVE-2016-6304) Guido Vranken discovered that OpenSSL used undefined behaviour when performing pointer arithmetic. (CVE-2016-2178) Quan Luo discovered that OpenSSL did not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries in the DTLS implementation. (CVE-2016-2179) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory in the TS_OBJ_print_bio() function. (CVE-2016-2180) It was discovered that the OpenSSL incorrectly handled the DTLS anti-replay feature. (CVE-2016-2181) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated division results. (CVE-2016-2182) Karthik Bhargavan and Gaetan Leurent discovered that the DES and Triple DES ciphers were vulnerable to birthday attacks. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to obtain clear text data from long encrypted sessions. This update moves DES from the HIGH cipher list to MEDIUM. (CVE-2016-2183) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain ticket lengths. (CVE-2016-6302) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory in the MDC2_Update() function. (CVE-2016-6303) Shi Lei discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly performed certain message length checks. (CVE-2016-6306) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: libssl1.0.0 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.38 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. References: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3087-2 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3087-1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/1626883 Package Information: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.1-4ubuntu5.38

Virtual servers in F5 BIG-IP systems 11.2.1 HF11 through HF15, 11.4.1 HF4 through HF10, 11.5.3 through 11.5.4, 11.6.0 HF5 through HF7, and 12.0.0, when configured with a TCP profile, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Traffic Management Microkernel restart) via crafted network traffic. Supplementary information : CWE Vulnerability type by CWE-284: Improper Access Control ( Inappropriate access control ) Has been identified. Multiple F5 BIG-IP products are prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to restart the device, resulting in denial-of-service condition. F5 BIG-IP is an all-in-one network device integrated with network traffic management, application security management, load balancing and other functions from F5 Corporation of the United States. The following versions are affected: F5 BIG-IP System Versions 11.2.1 HF11 to HF15, 11.4.1 HF4 to HF10, 11.5.3 to 11.5.4, 11.6.0 HF5 to HF7, 12.0.0

The Configuration utility in F5 BIG-IP systems 11.0.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.x before 11.2.1 HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.x before 11.4.1 HF10, 11.5.x before 11.5.4 HF2, 1.6.x before 11.6.1, and 12.0.0 before HF1 allows remote administrators to read Access Policy Manager (APM) access logs via unspecified vectors. Multiple F5 BIG-IP Products are prone to an information-disclosure vulnerability. Successfully exploiting this issue may allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. This may lead to other attacks. F5 BIG-IP is an all-in-one network device integrated with network traffic management, application security management, load balancing and other functions from F5 Corporation of the United States. The following versions are affected: F5 BIG-IP Systems 11.0.x, 11.1.x, 11.2.1 11.2.x prior to HF16, 11.3.x, 11.4.1 11.4.x prior to HF10, 11.5.4 11.5.x before HF2, 1.6.x before 11.6.1, 12.0.0 before HF1

MQCLI on IBM MQ Appliance M2000 and M2001 devices allows local users to execute arbitrary shell commands via a crafted (1) Disaster Recovery or (2) High Availability command. IBMMQAppliance is a solution that enables IBMMQ to be deployed in new use cases and to simplify existing deployment options. Allows a local attacker to exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands and obtain sensitive information. IBM MQ Appliance is prone to a local command-execution vulnerability. Both IBM MQ Appliance M2000 and M2001 are all-in-one devices used by IBM Corporation in the United States for the rapid deployment of enterprise-level message middleware

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software before 8.4(1) on ASA 5500, ASA 5500-X, PIX, and FWSM devices allows local users to gain privileges via invalid CLI commands, aka Bug ID CSCtu74257 or EPICBANANA. Multiple Cisco products are prone to a local code-execution vulnerability. A local attacker can leverage this issue to execute arbitrary code. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCtu74257. A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the command-line interface (CLI) parser in Cisco ASA Software releases prior to 8.4(3)

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the management interface in Huawei OceanStor ISM before V200R001C04SPC200 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the loginName parameter to cgi-bin/doLogin_CgiEntry and possibly other unspecified vectors. Huawei OceanStor ISM is prone to a cross-site scripting vulnerability because it fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input. An attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected device. This may help the attacker steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. Huawei OceanStor ISM is a set of integrated system management software used in storage products of Huawei in China. The following products and versions are affected: Huawei OceanStor ISM V200R001C01, V200R001C02, V200R001C03, and versions earlier than V200R001C04SPC200

This vulnerability allows attackers to escalate their privilege to system administrator on vulnerable installations of ABB DataManagerPro. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.The specific flaw exists within the file permissions set during product installation. The World account is set to have full rights to the directory that contains the binaries that are executed by system administrators. File substitution would then allow a standard user on the system to replace code that is subsequently run by a system administrator. ABB DataManagerPro is a set of data analysis software from Swiss ABB company. The software can automatically collect data via Ethernet and database management. A local attacker could use this vulnerability to gain elevated permissions

The Aggregated MAC Protocol Data Unit (AMPDU) implementation on Cisco Aironet 1800, 2800, and 3800 devices with software before 8.2.121.0 and 8.3.x before 8.3.102.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted AMPDU header, aka Bug ID CSCuz56288. Cisco Aironet AccessPoints is a set of wireless access point devices from Cisco. A denial of service vulnerability exists in the AggregatedMACProtocolDataUnit (AMPDU) implementation in the Cisco Aironet AccessPoints platform. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to send a device overload by sending a specially crafted AMPDU packet. Attackers can exploit this issue to reload the affected device, denying service to legitimate users. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuz56288. Cisco Aironet 1800, 2800, and 3800 are all routers of Cisco (Cisco). The following devices and versions are affected: Cisco Aironet 1800, 2800, 3800, versions prior to 8.2.121.0 and versions 8.3.x prior to 8.3.102.0

The Grapevine update process in Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Enterprise Module (APIC-EM) 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands as root via a crafted upgrade parameter, aka Bug ID CSCux15507. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code on the affected system with root privileges. This may aid in further attacks. This issue being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCux15507

CRLF injection vulnerability in Huawei FusionAccess before V100R006C00 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. Huawei FusionAccess Is CRLF An injection vulnerability exists. http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/113.htmlBy any third party HTTP Inserted header, HTTP There is a possibility of executing a response split attack. Huawei FusionAccess is prone to an HTTP header-injection vulnerability because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user input. An attacker can exploit this issue to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into a server response that could help to bypass security controls, perform cache poisoning and alter request or response page. This may aid in further attacks. Huawei FusionAccess is a desktop management system of Huawei's FusionCloud desktop cloud solution developed by China's Huawei (Huawei). The system can distribute, maintain and reclaim virtual desktops for users through a graphical Portal interface

Buffer overflow in the Cookie parser in Fortinet FortiOS 4.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.13, and 4.3.x before 4.3.9 and FortiSwitch before 3.4.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP request, aka EGREGIOUSBLUNDER. Fortinet FortiOS and FortiSwitch of Cookie The parser contains a buffer overflow vulnerability. Fortinet FortiGate is a network security platform developed by Fortinet. The platform provides features such as firewall, anti-virus and intrusion prevention (IPS), application control, anti-spam, wireless controller and WAN acceleration. The vulnerability stems from the program not performing correct boundary checks on user-submitted input. An attacker could use this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of an affected application and may cause a denial of service. Fortinet FortiGate is prone to a buffer-overflow vulnerability because it fails to properly bounds-check user-supplied data before copying it into an insufficiently sized buffer. Failed exploit attempts will result in denial-of-service conditions. The following versions are affected: Fortinet FortiGate 4.3.8 and prior Fortinet FortiGate 4.2.12 and prior Fortinet FortiGate 4.1.10 and prior. Fortinet FortiOS and FortiSwitch are products developed by Fortinet

Cisco Aironet 1800, 2800, and 3800 devices with software before 8.2.110.0, 8.2.12x before 8.2.121.0, and 8.3.x before 8.3.102.0 allow local users to gain privileges via crafted CLI parameters, aka Bug ID CSCuz24725. Cisco Aironet 1800 , 2800 ,and 3800 The device software contains a privileged vulnerability. Cisco Aironet AccessPoints is a set of wireless access point devices from Cisco. A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges on the device. This issue is being tracked by Cisco Bug ID CSCuz24725. Cisco Aironet 1800 , 2800 and 3800 Both are American Cisco ( Cisco ) company's router. The following products are affected: using 8.2.110.0 Version, 8.2.121.0 previous 8.2.12x Version, 8.3.102.0 previous 8.3.x version software Cisco Aironet 1800 , 2800 and 3800 equipment

Huawei AC6003, AC6005, AC6605, and ACU2 access controllers with software before V200R006C10SPC200 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device restart) via crafted CAPWAP packets. HuaweiAccessControllersAC6003 is a wireless access controller of China Huawei. A denial of service vulnerability exists in several Huawei products. Multiple Huawei Access Controllers are prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to restart the device, resulting in denial-of-service condition. The following products using software versions earlier than V200R006C10SPC200 are affected: Huawei AC6003, AC6005, AC6605, and ACU2